Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Is GBRS 6 too low to overcome? We have an appointment with Dr. Dalgren next week but just wanted to hear from you all about our dc's chances. In a what score range of the WISC does my dc needs to settle in to overcome that crazy GBRS? Thanks.
Anyone made it in last year with an extremely low GBRS?
We did.
GBRS 6
Nnat 117
CogAt
Verbal 138, Quant 127, Nonverbal 125, Composite 134
Wisc IV
Verbal 136, Perceptual 123, Working Mem 104, Processing 118
Woodcock Johnson 96th percentile for Reading and Math
Wow, that sounds just like what my DC needs. Thanks for posting. We at least have some hopes now. I just hope that my DC can focus and give 100% on the testing day.
Anonymous wrote:I kinow one mom who tried three times to get her DD into AAP. And finally the kid got in. So keep trying. You will wear them down eventually!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Is GBRS 6 too low to overcome? We have an appointment with Dr. Dalgren next week but just wanted to hear from you all about our dc's chances. In a what score range of the WISC does my dc needs to settle in to overcome that crazy GBRS? Thanks.
I agree, a wisc of over 140 or 145 would be necessary.
Wow.. that seems pretty high, but with GBRS 6 that might be the only bet. I guess I have to cross my finger for a top WISC score....
Anyone made it in last year with an extremely low GBRS?
Anonymous wrote:Disagree. A wisc of 125 would not overturn a GBRS of 6. A GBRS means that the student got at least one 1 on the GBRS commentary sheet. Remember the GBRS, this student could have gotten 1,1,1,3 or some other combination. The default for almost any student in gen ed would be a 1,1,1,1 or 4. So I think a high wisc would be necessary. just my opinion.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Does anyone else's school have their local committee assign the GBRS to in pool candidates first, before referrals are even due, and then the referrals only after they get referred? Seems like with this method, referred students already have bias against them since the teachers know they didn't make the pool.
This is the methodology outlined for schools by the AAP office. They do the in pool kids once they know who they are (late January), then they do the referrals after all the referrals come in by the Feb 8th date. They do it like this every year.
Here is the link which is on boarddocs. The pool kids GBRS are done by 2/8 and the referral kids are done by 3/1. All of the teachers know the scores when they come out and also who is in the pool in January. So I don't think the timing makes any bias. Probably the scores speak for themselves.
http://www.boarddocs.com/vsba/fairfax/Board.nsf/files/8XZS6F70FB55/$file/N2401.2012.pdf
Anonymous wrote:
Anyone made it in last year with an extremely low GBRS?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Is GBRS 6 too low to overcome? We have an appointment with Dr. Dalgren next week but just wanted to hear from you all about our dc's chances. In a what score range of the WISC does my dc needs to settle in to overcome that crazy GBRS? Thanks.
I agree, a wisc of over 140 or 145 would be necessary.
Anonymous wrote:Is GBRS 6 too low to overcome? We have an appointment with Dr. Dalgren next week but just wanted to hear from you all about our dc's chances. In a what score range of the WISC does my dc needs to settle in to overcome that crazy GBRS? Thanks.