Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Boring makeup boring hair boring dress.

It's the point. In recent weeks, she's had a series of high profile hit pieces criticizing her enjoyment of ill-gotten riches, and her penchant for cosmetic enhancements and sartorial get ups. This is her answer: I can be boring too. Except that the bosom will out and she couldn't resist the mermaid look.

I get what you're saying, but to me the antidote to those stories is to show up looking elegant and discreet. This look doesn't move her reputation forward at all.

Ha. This IS her version of elegant and discreet, PP. She is at heart a vulgar person, and her body is a little wide for the usual "slim elegance" looks. If she were to cover that bosom with a flowy top, she'd look fat. She's also very warm and kind-hearted in real life, BTW, so I don't want to be too mean. I don't mean vulgar in a moral sense, but in a visual sense. She just doesn't understand subtlety and restraint.

Do you know her in real life? She doesn't seem to understand philanthropy or giving back, which is a big indicator of being kind-hearted. She does seem sort of fun though

She sponsored the event but ok

Oh come on. She sponsored the event because she gets something out of that too. It's not like they just donated the money without strings.

Anonymous wrote:Just why did the K sisters both do this with their chest?!

Kylie’s dress/costume (because this is really just a big costume party) is amazing IMO.

“ Kylie Jenner’s appearance at the 2026 Met Gala was less a red-carpet moment than a study in living sculpture. Wearing a custom Schiaparelli creation, she embodied the house’s longstanding fascination with surrealism, anatomy, and the transformation of the female form into art. The gown’s sculpted bodice appeared almost carved rather than sewn, evoking the cool permanence of classical marble while retaining the fluid sensuality of couture.

The design immediately called to mind the Venus de Milo, the ancient Greek statue celebrated for its beauty, poise, and enigmatic incompleteness. Like the Venus, Jenner’s silhouette balanced softness with monumentality. The corseted structure mimicked the contours of a classical torso, creating the illusion that the dress had been molded directly onto the body, as though lifted from stone and brought to life. Schiaparelli’s craftsmanship transformed fabric into something architectural — an effect that blurred the line between fashion and museum artifact.

What made the look especially compelling was its tension between antiquity and modernity. The Venus de Milo represents an enduring ideal of beauty from the ancient world, while Jenner, as one of the defining celebrity figures of the digital era, represents contemporary image culture at its most amplified. By merging these references, Schiaparelli created a visual dialogue across centuries: the timelessness of classical art meeting the immediacy of modern celebrity.

The result was one of the most memorable interpretations of the evening — not simply because it was glamorous, but because it carried intellectual and artistic weight. Schiaparelli did not merely dress Kylie Jenner; the house turned her into a contemporary marble goddess, walking the Met steps as though she had stepped out of antiquity itself.”

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wintour looking lovely this year. She had some prior misses.

Why does she never change her hair? And wear those glasses?
Is there a medical reason?

It's so bizarre.

It’s a disguise. If you saw her in anything else she’s unrecognizable which is the point

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Just why did the K sisters both do this with their chest?!






It's satire. They want to say that they basically got famous by showing their tits. It is mocking the public that made them famous and rich just because they showed their body and nipples. Also, they want to say that their naked body is a work of art and the artistry of some plastic surgeon.

Elder sister Kim too...her nipples.

Kim, the Rock and Chase were the best dressed to me

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Boring makeup boring hair boring dress.

It's the point. In recent weeks, she's had a series of high profile hit pieces criticizing her enjoyment of ill-gotten riches, and her penchant for cosmetic enhancements and sartorial get ups. This is her answer: I can be boring too. Except that the bosom will out and she couldn't resist the mermaid look.

I get what you're saying, but to me the antidote to those stories is to show up looking elegant and discreet. This look doesn't move her reputation forward at all.

Ha. This IS her version of elegant and discreet, PP. She is at heart a vulgar person, and her body is a little wide for the usual "slim elegance" looks. If she were to cover that bosom with a flowy top, she'd look fat. She's also very warm and kind-hearted in real life, BTW, so I don't want to be too mean. I don't mean vulgar in a moral sense, but in a visual sense. She just doesn't understand subtlety and restraint.

Do you know her in real life? She doesn't seem to understand philanthropy or giving back, which is a big indicator of being kind-hearted. She does seem sort of fun though

She sponsored the event but ok

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Katy Perry. Was Justin Trudeau not invited?

Why does she have 6 fingers

I think the whole thing is meant to be commentary on AI.

Anonymous wrote:Katy Perry. Was Justin Trudeau not invited?

Why does she have 6 fingers

Anonymous wrote:Wintour looking lovely this year. She had some prior misses.

This looks familiar like something I’ve seen a middle eastern royal wearing

Anonymous wrote:Kidman has finally lost the age battle with her face. No complaints, she had a great run.

Face looks great. That hair though 😩

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Because of course.

There's always a nekked lady.

I actually think this would have worked better if they were eithet more daring with it or instead shaded the bodice differently. It gives the suggestion of exposure but isn't exposed at all. The nipples on the bodice remind me of nipples on the batsuit.

What are they trying to convey with this?

I know they think they are being witty but it’s not well executed and also isn’t that witty a comment anyway.

Also, I am irritated by Sarah Paulson with her dollar bill. If she wanted to protest the stupid Bezoses, fine, stay home. Or do something really bold like the tax the rich dress. This is like she wants to go to the fancy party but also pretend like she’s a social progressive.

After all the talk about boycotting due to the Bezos, did anyone actually decline the invite?

Trying to be witty, but none of these ladies would be famous if it weren’t for Kim’s sex tape. So yes, KJ women, your success is based off of the female body. Perhaps with the exception of Kendall, who is a natural beauty and tall, so could’ve made it in modeling without the sex tape.

Kendall looks more natural than some of her sisters but she had a lot of work done too:
https://www.reddit.com/r/PlasticSurgery/comments/1kww10p/i_had_to_share_this_kendall_jenner_before_and/

The only natural beauties among the Kardashian sisters are Kim and Kourtney (who still both use extensive botox, filler, and heavy contouring to change the look of their faces). Kendall and Kylie had more work done than Kim, who actually doesn't look that different than when she was a teen, and many of the differences are due her super stylized makeup. Kendall had to have work done in order to become a model because runway and editorial models have to be able to look beautiful even without makeup, or in different styles. She can't just walk around with 8 pounds of contour on at all times. Even Khloe's more recent transformation has been less dramatic than Kendall's glow up to launch her modeling career.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Because of course.

There's always a nekked lady.

I actually think this would have worked better if they were eithet more daring with it or instead shaded the bodice differently. It gives the suggestion of exposure but isn't exposed at all. The nipples on the bodice remind me of nipples on the batsuit.

What are they trying to convey with this?

I know they think they are being witty but it’s not well executed and also isn’t that witty a comment anyway.

Also, I am irritated by Sarah Paulson with her dollar bill. If she wanted to protest the stupid Bezoses, fine, stay home. Or do something really bold like the tax the rich dress. This is like she wants to go to the fancy party but also pretend like she’s a social progressive.

After all the talk about boycotting due to the Bezos, did anyone actually decline the invite?

Trying to be witty, but none of these ladies would be famous if it weren’t for Kim’s sex tape. So yes, KJ women, your success is based off of the female body. Perhaps with the exception of Kendall, who is a natural beauty and tall, so could’ve made it in modeling without the sex tape.

Kendall looks more natural than some of her sisters but she had a lot of work done too:
https://www.reddit.com/r/PlasticSurgery/comments/1kww10p/i_had_to_share_this_kendall_jenner_before_and/

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I love this interpretation so pretty.

That looked more hot pink/almost magenta on my tv last night, but here the color matching is much better. I like it!

I want to love it but I don’t understand the fitting on the bodice where the boobs are pushed down and smashed up like she’s getting a mammogram. That’s a very popular look lately so I guess it’s intentional, but I don’t get it.

I don't like that either- it looks like it doesn't fit, but surely it must be intentional?

It isn’t. Angela Bassett is not sacred to me, she was never owed an Oscar, and per her uzh, she’s looking big and having overspill in a corset with a post-Meno skin flap escaping. She’d have looked way better in a looser gown, with her hair pinned back like the woman in the referenced painting.

Beyoncé is an absolute mess. You can see her shape wear and the pooch. The dress looks like it’s unusually heavy even for costume. I wish she’d done something else, she is a gorgeous woman.

How much are they paying someone to keep Beyoncé on the front page for this sh*t? She belongs on worst dressed not best.

And can they stop with upselling their kid. Gross.

It really is pathetic

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Just why did the K sisters both do this with their chest?!

Kylie's face is melting into a(nother) different person

Are they styled as paintings where the model was part nude hence those weird bodysuits?

What was Kim?

These looks are so ugly and unflattering.

I wish I could effectively use AI to just remove all Kardashian/Jenners from my timeline.

OMG yes. Please show me if you figure it out.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Heidi Klum, always a fan of extreme costuming:

wow, she has gained weight.

It's prosthetics, inspired by Corradini

Bodies today so not look like bodies even 100 years ago. Props to Heidi for being culturally aware of that

This is the more believable attribution.

PP. Per link name, it is a Vestal Virgin. Which explains the veil. Totally pagan.

She'll never pass as a virgin!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Heidi Klum, always a fan of extreme costuming:

wow, she has gained weight.

It's prosthetics, inspired by Corradini

Bodies today so not look like bodies even 100 years ago. Props to Heidi for being culturally aware of that

This is the more believable attribution.

PP. Per link name, it is a Vestal Virgin. Which explains the veil. Totally pagan.