Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Now it makes sense why Netanyahu had to deny two or three times that Israel wasn't behind Charlie Kirk's death. Kent was blocked from investigating the assassination by some "foreign nexus"
It is fascinating that the death of Charlie Kirk has turned into a right wing conspiracy. I wasn’t expecting this to happen when he died.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Hmm. I think they're all liars: this Joe Kent, who is a known peddler of conspiracy theories, and the Israel government and associated pressure groups. To be entirely honest, I highly doubt Kirk ever said that to Kent. I detest all of the people and groups we're discussing, so I don't have any sort of preference bias here.
Lol Candace Owens has literally been publishing text messages she had with CK about this. And CK's position on Israel has been corroborated from people within TPUSA, who have nonetheless been trying to silence Candace with coordinated character assassination attempts.
Anonymous wrote:As many have pointed out: Weird how right up until he mentioned Israel being the reason for this war, not a single critic who suddenly slithered out from under their rocks mentioned a thing about him being all of the things they suddenly have an issue with. Suddenly, it concerns genocidal, supremacist filth and Biden adviser Amos Hochstein that Kent is a "Neo-Nazi." No issue w/ that "Neo-Nazi" when he was going along w/ the mass murder in the ME. That also goes for the supposed "leaks." So I guess it's OK when you leak to Barak Ravid over and over and over again, because it's in service to Israel, but if the leaks calls them out, it must be investigated.
Did these bloodthirsty animals think we can't see the audaciousness of how they operate?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Hmm. I think they're all liars: this Joe Kent, who is a known peddler of conspiracy theories, and the Israel government and associated pressure groups. To be entirely honest, I highly doubt Kirk ever said that to Kent. I detest all of the people and groups we're discussing, so I don't have any sort of preference bias here.
It was well reported that Kirk was vehemently against the war with Iran both publicly and even in private meetings with the president.
Considering how influential Kirk is especially among the younger generation, it would not be surprising that the "Israeli mob" would need him taken out in order to silence any dissenting voices.

Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Hmm. I think they're all liars: this Joe Kent, who is a known peddler of conspiracy theories, and the Israel government and associated pressure groups. To be entirely honest, I highly doubt Kirk ever said that to Kent. I detest all of the people and groups we're discussing, so I don't have any sort of preference bias here.
It was well reported that Kirk was vehemently against the war with Iran both publicly and even in private meetings with the president.
Considering how influential Kirk is especially among the younger generation, it would not be surprising that the "Israeli mob" would need him taken out in order to silence any dissenting voices.
Anonymous wrote:
Hmm. I think they're all liars: this Joe Kent, who is a known peddler of conspiracy theories, and the Israel government and associated pressure groups. To be entirely honest, I highly doubt Kirk ever said that to Kent. I detest all of the people and groups we're discussing, so I don't have any sort of preference bias here.
Anonymous wrote:
Hmm. I think they're all liars: this Joe Kent, who is a known peddler of conspiracy theories, and the Israel government and associated pressure groups. To be entirely honest, I highly doubt Kirk ever said that to Kent. I detest all of the people and groups we're discussing, so I don't have any sort of preference bias here.
Anonymous wrote:![]()
Looks like a smear campaign is being coordinated by Israeli supporters to discredit the damning interview by Joe Kent.