Anonymous wrote:If at all.

Anonymous wrote:What differentiates us from animals is the knowledge not to murder and have sex with everyone

Anonymous wrote:What differentiates us from animals is the knowledge not to murder and have sex with everyone

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So “sex positive” means tons of different sexual partners a year? Got it.

It means I can sleep with another consenting adult whenever I want. Why do you care how many people other people sleep with? The only person you should worry about is you.

So I don’t sleep with you.

Oh, honey, I have standards. You’d never get a chance.

By definition it's impossible to have high standard of selecting partners if you sleep with hundreds without even knowing their personality, if they are jerks or good people. I find sex is the best when there are feelings towards my partner. I slept with 11 men in a lifetime (which I don't think is a low number), but each of them was meaningful. Each was amazing in their own way, I learned something from them or about myself from those relationships, they became a catalyst for my future life, goals setting, even career. I remember every day spent with each of them
I guest some women just value sex on its' own, but to me it's just bumping uglies if no connection.

I love how you admit to whoring around but think that your number is appropriate and good but someone who has had more partners is has no standards and is bad. Also, who said anything about 100s. Why do you people have the need to make shit up to tear someone down?

I don’t care how you have sex or any you need some magical connection. I don’t care how many partners you had. Apparently you did what you wanted to satisfy your needs. Why are you so stupid that you can’t extend the same courtesy to others?

I was in relationships with all these men and slept only if I felt a relationship was building up. I avoid people who disconnect sex from emotions - they are just different people with different values that I don’t understand. Particular for women given HPV, herpes etc transmit even with condoms . I understand these women exist but feel same as I would to someone who smokes or overeats. It is a risky sexual behavior
And no, 11 partners in a lifetime from 19 to late 40s is nowhere closer to “whoring”

To someone that has only had one partner of course it is whoring. It’s just an arbitrary number that you are ok with because you excused your behavior as pure and good. 11 and 30 is no different in any practical sense. It’s just that your number is 11 so that’s automatically good.

No that’s not what I meant. My response was to a PP woman poster who’s said she slept with 5+ men a year AND had high standards. It’s no way possible to get to know any man well if you keep up sleeping with so many people a year. I don’t know if there is a reasonable number but a busy professional woman simply has no time to date that many men and also know their values

agree, that amount of sleeping around points to no standards or discrepancy in partners. Plus devalues everything, including herself.

Luckily the loose types are easy to spot.

What I dislike about this poster as that she actually does a disservice to other women by her baseless chains and normalization of deviant sexual models. There are stats on sexual behaviors and the US average lifetime number of partners for a woman is 4.
I literally know zero women in my circle who had 75 partners. I’m probably the record holder with 11, and I consider myself as a pretty sexually active person though life

Oh brother! A disservice to women is horseshit that men are hormonaly driven to have sex so it’s ok to sleep around but women have no such desires so it’s deviant. You sound super dumb.

#oxymoronic

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So “sex positive” means tons of different sexual partners a year? Got it.

It means I can sleep with another consenting adult whenever I want. Why do you care how many people other people sleep with? The only person you should worry about is you.

So I don’t sleep with you.

Oh, honey, I have standards. You’d never get a chance.

By definition it's impossible to have high standard of selecting partners if you sleep with hundreds without even knowing their personality, if they are jerks or good people. I find sex is the best when there are feelings towards my partner. I slept with 11 men in a lifetime (which I don't think is a low number), but each of them was meaningful. Each was amazing in their own way, I learned something from them or about myself from those relationships, they became a catalyst for my future life, goals setting, even career. I remember every day spent with each of them
I guest some women just value sex on its' own, but to me it's just bumping uglies if no connection.

I love how you admit to whoring around but think that your number is appropriate and good but someone who has had more partners is has no standards and is bad. Also, who said anything about 100s. Why do you people have the need to make shit up to tear someone down?

I don’t care how you have sex or any you need some magical connection. I don’t care how many partners you had. Apparently you did what you wanted to satisfy your needs. Why are you so stupid that you can’t extend the same courtesy to others?

I was in relationships with all these men and slept only if I felt a relationship was building up. I avoid people who disconnect sex from emotions - they are just different people with different values that I don’t understand. Particular for women given HPV, herpes etc transmit even with condoms . I understand these women exist but feel same as I would to someone who smokes or overeats. It is a risky sexual behavior
And no, 11 partners in a lifetime from 19 to late 40s is nowhere closer to “whoring”

To someone that has only had one partner of course it is whoring. It’s just an arbitrary number that you are ok with because you excused your behavior as pure and good. 11 and 30 is no different in any practical sense. It’s just that your number is 11 so that’s automatically good.

No that’s not what I meant. My response was to a PP woman poster who’s said she slept with 5+ men a year AND had high standards. It’s no way possible to get to know any man well if you keep up sleeping with so many people a year. I don’t know if there is a reasonable number but a busy professional woman simply has no time to date that many men and also know their values

agree, that amount of sleeping around points to no standards or discrepancy in partners. Plus devalues everything, including herself.

Luckily the loose types are easy to spot.

What I dislike about this poster as that she actually does a disservice to other women by her baseless chains and normalization of deviant sexual models. There are stats on sexual behaviors and the US average lifetime number of partners for a woman is 4.
I literally know zero women in my circle who had 75 partners. I’m probably the record holder with 11, and I consider myself as a pretty sexually active person though life

True again.

Maybe the sex deviant is trolling.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So “sex positive” means tons of different sexual partners a year? Got it.

It means I can sleep with another consenting adult whenever I want. Why do you care how many people other people sleep with? The only person you should worry about is you.

So I don’t sleep with you.

Oh, honey, I have standards. You’d never get a chance.

By definition it's impossible to have high standard of selecting partners if you sleep with hundreds without even knowing their personality, if they are jerks or good people. I find sex is the best when there are feelings towards my partner. I slept with 11 men in a lifetime (which I don't think is a low number), but each of them was meaningful. Each was amazing in their own way, I learned something from them or about myself from those relationships, they became a catalyst for my future life, goals setting, even career. I remember every day spent with each of them
I guest some women just value sex on its' own, but to me it's just bumping uglies if no connection.

I love how you admit to whoring around but think that your number is appropriate and good but someone who has had more partners is has no standards and is bad. Also, who said anything about 100s. Why do you people have the need to make shit up to tear someone down?

I don’t care how you have sex or any you need some magical connection. I don’t care how many partners you had. Apparently you did what you wanted to satisfy your needs. Why are you so stupid that you can’t extend the same courtesy to others?

I was in relationships with all these men and slept only if I felt a relationship was building up. I avoid people who disconnect sex from emotions - they are just different people with different values that I don’t understand. Particular for women given HPV, herpes etc transmit even with condoms . I understand these women exist but feel same as I would to someone who smokes or overeats. It is a risky sexual behavior
And no, 11 partners in a lifetime from 19 to late 40s is nowhere closer to “whoring”

To someone that has only had one partner of course it is whoring. It’s just an arbitrary number that you are ok with because you excused your behavior as pure and good. 11 and 30 is no different in any practical sense. It’s just that your number is 11 so that’s automatically good.

No that’s not what I meant. My response was to a PP woman poster who’s said she slept with 5+ men a year AND had high standards. It’s no way possible to get to know any man well if you keep up sleeping with so many people a year. I don’t know if there is a reasonable number but a busy professional woman simply has no time to date that many men and also know their values

agree, that amount of sleeping around points to no standards or discrepancy in partners. Plus devalues everything, including herself.

Luckily the loose types are easy to spot.

What I dislike about this poster as that she actually does a disservice to other women by her baseless chains and normalization of deviant sexual models. There are stats on sexual behaviors and the US average lifetime number of partners for a woman is 4.
I literally know zero women in my circle who had 75 partners. I’m probably the record holder with 11, and I consider myself as a pretty sexually active person though life

Oh brother! A disservice to women is horseshit that men are hormonaly driven to have sex so it’s ok to sleep around but women have no such desires so it’s deviant. You sound super dumb.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So “sex positive” means tons of different sexual partners a year? Got it.

It means I can sleep with another consenting adult whenever I want. Why do you care how many people other people sleep with? The only person you should worry about is you.

So I don’t sleep with you.

Oh, honey, I have standards. You’d never get a chance.

By definition it's impossible to have high standard of selecting partners if you sleep with hundreds without even knowing their personality, if they are jerks or good people. I find sex is the best when there are feelings towards my partner. I slept with 11 men in a lifetime (which I don't think is a low number), but each of them was meaningful. Each was amazing in their own way, I learned something from them or about myself from those relationships, they became a catalyst for my future life, goals setting, even career. I remember every day spent with each of them
I guest some women just value sex on its' own, but to me it's just bumping uglies if no connection.

I love how you admit to whoring around but think that your number is appropriate and good but someone who has had more partners is has no standards and is bad. Also, who said anything about 100s. Why do you people have the need to make shit up to tear someone down?

I don’t care how you have sex or any you need some magical connection. I don’t care how many partners you had. Apparently you did what you wanted to satisfy your needs. Why are you so stupid that you can’t extend the same courtesy to others?

I was in relationships with all these men and slept only if I felt a relationship was building up. I avoid people who disconnect sex from emotions - they are just different people with different values that I don’t understand. Particular for women given HPV, herpes etc transmit even with condoms . I understand these women exist but feel same as I would to someone who smokes or overeats. It is a risky sexual behavior
And no, 11 partners in a lifetime from 19 to late 40s is nowhere closer to “whoring”

To someone that has only had one partner of course it is whoring. It’s just an arbitrary number that you are ok with because you excused your behavior as pure and good. 11 and 30 is no different in any practical sense. It’s just that your number is 11 so that’s automatically good.

No that’s not what I meant. My response was to a PP woman poster who’s said she slept with 5+ men a year AND had high standards. It’s no way possible to get to know any man well if you keep up sleeping with so many people a year. I don’t know if there is a reasonable number but a busy professional woman simply has no time to date that many men and also know their values

agree, that amount of sleeping around points to no standards or discrepancy in partners. Plus devalues everything, including herself.

Luckily the loose types are easy to spot.

What I dislike about this poster as that she actually does a disservice to other women by her baseless chains and normalization of deviant sexual models. There are stats on sexual behaviors and the US average lifetime number of partners for a woman is 4.
I literally know zero women in my circle who had 75 partners. I’m probably the record holder with 11, and I consider myself as a pretty sexually active person though life

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So “sex positive” means tons of different sexual partners a year? Got it.

It means I can sleep with another consenting adult whenever I want. Why do you care how many people other people sleep with? The only person you should worry about is you.

So I don’t sleep with you.

Oh, honey, I have standards. You’d never get a chance.

By definition it's impossible to have high standard of selecting partners if you sleep with hundreds without even knowing their personality, if they are jerks or good people. I find sex is the best when there are feelings towards my partner. I slept with 11 men in a lifetime (which I don't think is a low number), but each of them was meaningful. Each was amazing in their own way, I learned something from them or about myself from those relationships, they became a catalyst for my future life, goals setting, even career. I remember every day spent with each of them
I guest some women just value sex on its' own, but to me it's just bumping uglies if no connection.

I love how you admit to whoring around but think that your number is appropriate and good but someone who has had more partners is has no standards and is bad. Also, who said anything about 100s. Why do you people have the need to make shit up to tear someone down?

I don’t care how you have sex or any you need some magical connection. I don’t care how many partners you had. Apparently you did what you wanted to satisfy your needs. Why are you so stupid that you can’t extend the same courtesy to others?

I was in relationships with all these men and slept only if I felt a relationship was building up. I avoid people who disconnect sex from emotions - they are just different people with different values that I don’t understand. Particular for women given HPV, herpes etc transmit even with condoms . I understand these women exist but feel same as I would to someone who smokes or overeats. It is a risky sexual behavior
And no, 11 partners in a lifetime from 19 to late 40s is nowhere closer to “whoring”

To someone that has only had one partner of course it is whoring. It’s just an arbitrary number that you are ok with because you excused your behavior as pure and good. 11 and 30 is no different in any practical sense. It’s just that your number is 11 so that’s automatically good.

No that’s not what I meant. My response was to a PP woman poster who’s said she slept with 5+ men a year AND had high standards. It’s no way possible to get to know any man well if you keep up sleeping with so many people a year. I don’t know if there is a reasonable number but a busy professional woman simply has no time to date that many men and also know their values

You responded to me and I never said how many people I slept with. I simply said I have high standards of who I sleep with and the number is irrelevant. You inability to imagine that because of whatever norms you have created in your head is none of my business.

You said that “I thinks that’s pretty normal. By mid-30s, the expectation is that most folks would have ~ 75 partners or so.”
Also you said that sex can be absolutely just a normal physical activity no “special “ connection besides sex itself and that’s ok for you.
You also claimed having “high standards”. From that it’s easy to infer that you have over 75 partners if older than 30.
Also I figure that if a woman sleeps with 5 men a year you can only infer some of the qualities of these men : attractiveness, income level.
But you absolutely were not looking for connection with them or trying to figure out their values, relationship goals, quality of their social circle etc.

That is NOT a typical female sexual behaviors. Women are usually pretty cautious selective and protective of their home, bodies etc.
Also that would be not hygienic at a minimum. I could understand why a man could behave like that (they are testosterone dependent). But women are not normally that promiscuous, barring mental disorders or substance abuse

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So “sex positive” means tons of different sexual partners a year? Got it.

It means I can sleep with another consenting adult whenever I want. Why do you care how many people other people sleep with? The only person you should worry about is you.

So I don’t sleep with you.

Oh, honey, I have standards. You’d never get a chance.

By definition it's impossible to have high standard of selecting partners if you sleep with hundreds without even knowing their personality, if they are jerks or good people. I find sex is the best when there are feelings towards my partner. I slept with 11 men in a lifetime (which I don't think is a low number), but each of them was meaningful. Each was amazing in their own way, I learned something from them or about myself from those relationships, they became a catalyst for my future life, goals setting, even career. I remember every day spent with each of them
I guest some women just value sex on its' own, but to me it's just bumping uglies if no connection.

I love how you admit to whoring around but think that your number is appropriate and good but someone who has had more partners is has no standards and is bad. Also, who said anything about 100s. Why do you people have the need to make shit up to tear someone down?

I don’t care how you have sex or any you need some magical connection. I don’t care how many partners you had. Apparently you did what you wanted to satisfy your needs. Why are you so stupid that you can’t extend the same courtesy to others?

I was in relationships with all these men and slept only if I felt a relationship was building up. I avoid people who disconnect sex from emotions - they are just different people with different values that I don’t understand. Particular for women given HPV, herpes etc transmit even with condoms . I understand these women exist but feel same as I would to someone who smokes or overeats. It is a risky sexual behavior
And no, 11 partners in a lifetime from 19 to late 40s is nowhere closer to “whoring”

To someone that has only had one partner of course it is whoring. It’s just an arbitrary number that you are ok with because you excused your behavior as pure and good. 11 and 30 is no different in any practical sense. It’s just that your number is 11 so that’s automatically good.

No that’s not what I meant. My response was to a PP woman poster who’s said she slept with 5+ men a year AND had high standards. It’s no way possible to get to know any man well if you keep up sleeping with so many people a year. I don’t know if there is a reasonable number but a busy professional woman simply has no time to date that many men and also know their values

agree, that amount of sleeping around points to no standards or discrepancy in partners. Plus devalues everything, including herself.

Luckily the loose types are easy to spot.

What I dislike about this poster as that she actually does a disservice to other women by her baseless chains and normalization of deviant sexual models. There are stats on sexual behaviors and the US average lifetime number of partners for a woman is 4.
I literally know zero women in my circle who had 75 partners. I’m probably the record holder with 11, and I consider myself as a pretty sexually active person though life

Oh brother! A disservice to women is horseshit that men are hormonaly driven to have sex so it’s ok to sleep around but women have no such desires so it’s deviant. You sound super dumb.

But that’s just the biological fact. Any woman who was on HTR with testosterone would feel the difference. And I didn’t sleep with only high paid men. Actually I was stating the opposite: if the woman sleeps with so many, income level , looks and height are pretty much her only “standards”
I stand by my statement and it’s confirmed by multiple studies that most women need mental connection to enjoy sex

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So “sex positive” means tons of different sexual partners a year? Got it.

It means I can sleep with another consenting adult whenever I want. Why do you care how many people other people sleep with? The only person you should worry about is you.

So I don’t sleep with you.

Oh, honey, I have standards. You’d never get a chance.

By definition it's impossible to have high standard of selecting partners if you sleep with hundreds without even knowing their personality, if they are jerks or good people. I find sex is the best when there are feelings towards my partner. I slept with 11 men in a lifetime (which I don't think is a low number), but each of them was meaningful. Each was amazing in their own way, I learned something from them or about myself from those relationships, they became a catalyst for my future life, goals setting, even career. I remember every day spent with each of them
I guest some women just value sex on its' own, but to me it's just bumping uglies if no connection.

I love how you admit to whoring around but think that your number is appropriate and good but someone who has had more partners is has no standards and is bad. Also, who said anything about 100s. Why do you people have the need to make shit up to tear someone down?

I don’t care how you have sex or any you need some magical connection. I don’t care how many partners you had. Apparently you did what you wanted to satisfy your needs. Why are you so stupid that you can’t extend the same courtesy to others?

I was in relationships with all these men and slept only if I felt a relationship was building up. I avoid people who disconnect sex from emotions - they are just different people with different values that I don’t understand. Particular for women given HPV, herpes etc transmit even with condoms . I understand these women exist but feel same as I would to someone who smokes or overeats. It is a risky sexual behavior
And no, 11 partners in a lifetime from 19 to late 40s is nowhere closer to “whoring”

To someone that has only had one partner of course it is whoring. It’s just an arbitrary number that you are ok with because you excused your behavior as pure and good. 11 and 30 is no different in any practical sense. It’s just that your number is 11 so that’s automatically good.

No that’s not what I meant. My response was to a PP woman poster who’s said she slept with 5+ men a year AND had high standards. It’s no way possible to get to know any man well if you keep up sleeping with so many people a year. I don’t know if there is a reasonable number but a busy professional woman simply has no time to date that many men and also know their values

agree, that amount of sleeping around points to no standards or discrepancy in partners. Plus devalues everything, including herself.

Luckily the loose types are easy to spot.

What I dislike about this poster as that she actually does a disservice to other women by her baseless chains and normalization of deviant sexual models. There are stats on sexual behaviors and the US average lifetime number of partners for a woman is 4.
I literally know zero women in my circle who had 75 partners. I’m probably the record holder with 11, and I consider myself as a pretty sexually active person though life

Oh brother! A disservice to women is horseshit that men are hormonaly driven to have sex so it’s ok to sleep around but women have no such desires so it’s deviant. You sound super dumb.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I didn't sleep around too much in college but I did in my 20s. Ironically, I now find myself in a sexless marriage. I settled for someone who would be a good partner and father but he's never been great in bed. He has all of the equipment but definitely not the drive or the moves. I haven't cheated on him but the memories of two very sensuous relationships I once had keep me alive inside. I'm in my 50s now so I doubt I could even find an AP.

Same here. I commented upthread. It sucks. And I have kept myself up.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So “sex positive” means tons of different sexual partners a year? Got it.

It means I can sleep with another consenting adult whenever I want. Why do you care how many people other people sleep with? The only person you should worry about is you.

So I don’t sleep with you.

Oh, honey, I have standards. You’d never get a chance.

By definition it's impossible to have high standard of selecting partners if you sleep with hundreds without even knowing their personality, if they are jerks or good people. I find sex is the best when there are feelings towards my partner. I slept with 11 men in a lifetime (which I don't think is a low number), but each of them was meaningful. Each was amazing in their own way, I learned something from them or about myself from those relationships, they became a catalyst for my future life, goals setting, even career. I remember every day spent with each of them
I guest some women just value sex on its' own, but to me it's just bumping uglies if no connection.

I love how you admit to whoring around but think that your number is appropriate and good but someone who has had more partners is has no standards and is bad. Also, who said anything about 100s. Why do you people have the need to make shit up to tear someone down?

I don’t care how you have sex or any you need some magical connection. I don’t care how many partners you had. Apparently you did what you wanted to satisfy your needs. Why are you so stupid that you can’t extend the same courtesy to others?

I was in relationships with all these men and slept only if I felt a relationship was building up. I avoid people who disconnect sex from emotions - they are just different people with different values that I don’t understand. Particular for women given HPV, herpes etc transmit even with condoms . I understand these women exist but feel same as I would to someone who smokes or overeats. It is a risky sexual behavior
And no, 11 partners in a lifetime from 19 to late 40s is nowhere closer to “whoring”

To someone that has only had one partner of course it is whoring. It’s just an arbitrary number that you are ok with because you excused your behavior as pure and good. 11 and 30 is no different in any practical sense. It’s just that your number is 11 so that’s automatically good.

No that’s not what I meant. My response was to a PP woman poster who’s said she slept with 5+ men a year AND had high standards. It’s no way possible to get to know any man well if you keep up sleeping with so many people a year. I don’t know if there is a reasonable number but a busy professional woman simply has no time to date that many men and also know their values

agree, that amount of sleeping around points to no standards or discrepancy in partners. Plus devalues everything, including herself.

Luckily the loose types are easy to spot.

What I dislike about this poster as that she actually does a disservice to other women by her baseless chains and normalization of deviant sexual models. There are stats on sexual behaviors and the US average lifetime number of partners for a woman is 4.
I literally know zero women in my circle who had 75 partners. I’m probably the record holder with 11, and I consider myself as a pretty sexually active person though life

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So “sex positive” means tons of different sexual partners a year? Got it.

It means I can sleep with another consenting adult whenever I want. Why do you care how many people other people sleep with? The only person you should worry about is you.

So I don’t sleep with you.

Oh, honey, I have standards. You’d never get a chance.

By definition it's impossible to have high standard of selecting partners if you sleep with hundreds without even knowing their personality, if they are jerks or good people. I find sex is the best when there are feelings towards my partner. I slept with 11 men in a lifetime (which I don't think is a low number), but each of them was meaningful. Each was amazing in their own way, I learned something from them or about myself from those relationships, they became a catalyst for my future life, goals setting, even career. I remember every day spent with each of them
I guest some women just value sex on its' own, but to me it's just bumping uglies if no connection.

I love how you admit to whoring around but think that your number is appropriate and good but someone who has had more partners is has no standards and is bad. Also, who said anything about 100s. Why do you people have the need to make shit up to tear someone down?

I don’t care how you have sex or any you need some magical connection. I don’t care how many partners you had. Apparently you did what you wanted to satisfy your needs. Why are you so stupid that you can’t extend the same courtesy to others?

I was in relationships with all these men and slept only if I felt a relationship was building up. I avoid people who disconnect sex from emotions - they are just different people with different values that I don’t understand. Particular for women given HPV, herpes etc transmit even with condoms . I understand these women exist but feel same as I would to someone who smokes or overeats. It is a risky sexual behavior
And no, 11 partners in a lifetime from 19 to late 40s is nowhere closer to “whoring”

To someone that has only had one partner of course it is whoring. It’s just an arbitrary number that you are ok with because you excused your behavior as pure and good. 11 and 30 is no different in any practical sense. It’s just that your number is 11 so that’s automatically good.

No that’s not what I meant. My response was to a PP woman poster who’s said she slept with 5+ men a year AND had high standards. It’s no way possible to get to know any man well if you keep up sleeping with so many people a year. I don’t know if there is a reasonable number but a busy professional woman simply has no time to date that many men and also know their values

You responded to me and I never said how many people I slept with. I simply said I have high standards of who I sleep with and the number is irrelevant. You inability to imagine that because of whatever norms you have created in your head is none of my business.

You said that “I thinks that’s pretty normal. By mid-30s, the expectation is that most folks would have ~ 75 partners or so.” Also you said that sex can be absolutely just a normal physical activity no “special “ connection besides sex itself and that’s ok for you. You also claimed having “high standards”. From that it’s easy to infer that you have over 75 partners if older than 30. Also I figure that if a woman sleeps with 5 men a year you can only infer some of the qualities of these men : attractiveness, income level. But you absolutely were not looking for connection with them or trying to figure out their values, relationship goals, quality of their social circle etc.
That is NOT a typical female sexual behaviors. Women are usually pretty cautious selective and protective of their home, bodies etc.
Also that would be not hygienic at a minimum. I could understand why a man could behave like that (they are testosterone dependent). But women are not normally that promiscuous, barring mental disorders or substance abuse