Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:JHU and Emory are about the same reputation to most people.
GA residents should utilize their two top public options. Excellent value.
Agreed. Much better value.
If they can get into GA Tech or UGA. Not everyone can.
If they can get into Emory they likely can. The publics are way better bang for the buck.
i think they realize this. in state yield for emory is only 40%
Emory's two year college/community college is a great way to open access to students who otherwise would not be able to attend. Once they demonstrate they can do the work, Emory lets them move to the 4 year campus. This takes a page from public colleges like UCF, Penn State, UConn etc.
Emory-Oxford students’ stats are almost identical to the stats of students on Emory’s main campus. They can do the work.
This for a back door, its probably the hardest backdoor in the world. Harder admit than Barnard.
436/2900 = 15% yield. Literally almost no one wants to be there. Meanwhile you have this:
https://provost.emory.edu/planning-administration/data/factbook/admissions.html
76% of the class were in top 10% of class rank and only 70% for Oxford. Emory/Oxford has never enrolled the top students and it never will.
Meanwhile Barnard:
https://barnard.edu/first-year-class-profile
91% in the top decile of their high school class rank (for those providing a class rank)
Testing Data (for those reporting under our test-optional policy)
SAT mid-50% range: 1470-1540
Meanwhile
https://apply.emory.edu/discover/about/first-year.html
Emory
1500-1570
33-35
Oxford
1480- 1560
33-35
Barnard
1470-1540
32-35
Anonymous wrote:
What about the schools between HYPSM and Emory/BC/Wake/Tulane/NYU? Let's say Chicago/Washu/Vandy?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't know about emory but tulane, nyu and wake have baddies from umc families -- which is a pretty big selling point if you have a umc son.
The dating pool is more curated.
Baddies?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Vanderbilt is not a peer of Emory. It has no funky community college thing going on, doesn't admit 2/3rds of the class ED, has higher SATs, and never cheated and tried to game the rankings by lying about admission data.
Vanderbilt says Emory is their peer and vice versa, but good luck to your mental illness. Also Vandy’s test scores are about 10 points higher, and they have around a 25% transfer acceptance rate, compared to Emory's 15%.
Anonymous wrote:So Emory ( ranked 24) is peers with Tulane ( ranked 67) but not Vanderbilt ( ranked 18). Was your DC rejected from Emory pp? Or were you rejected years ago?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't know about emory but tulane, nyu and wake have baddies from umc families -- which is a pretty big selling point if you have a umc son.
The dating pool is more curated.
Baddies?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Vanderbilt is not a peer of Emory. It has no funky community college thing going on, doesn't admit 2/3rds of the class ED, has higher SATs, and never cheated and tried to game the rankings by lying about admission data.
Vanderbilt says Emory is their peer and vice versa, but good luck to your mental illness. Also Vandy’s test scores are about 10 points higher, and they have around a 25% transfer acceptance rate, compared to Emory's 15%.
Stop. Emory has a junior college. It is not close to the prestige of Vanderbilt.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Vanderbilt is not a peer of Emory. It has no funky community college thing going on, doesn't admit 2/3rds of the class ED, has higher SATs, and never cheated and tried to game the rankings by lying about admission data.
Vanderbilt says Emory is their peer and vice versa, but good luck to your mental illness. Also Vandy’s test scores are about 10 points higher, and they have around a 25% transfer acceptance rate, compared to Emory's 15%.
Anonymous wrote:I don't know about emory but tulane, nyu and wake have baddies from umc families -- which is a pretty big selling point if you have a umc son.
The dating pool is more curated.
Anonymous wrote:Vanderbilt is not a peer of Emory. It has no funky community college thing going on, doesn't admit 2/3rds of the class ED, has higher SATs, and never cheated and tried to game the rankings by lying about admission data.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:JHU and Emory are about the same reputation to most people.
GA residents should utilize their two top public options. Excellent value.
Agreed. Much better value.
If they can get into GA Tech or UGA. Not everyone can.
If they can get into Emory they likely can. The publics are way better bang for the buck.
i think they realize this. in state yield for emory is only 40%
Emory's two year college/community college is a great way to open access to students who otherwise would not be able to attend. Once they demonstrate they can do the work, Emory lets them move to the 4 year campus. This takes a page from public colleges like UCF, Penn State, UConn etc.
Emory-Oxford students’ stats are almost identical to the stats of students on Emory’s main campus. They can do the work.
This for a back door, its probably the hardest backdoor in the world. Harder admit than Barnard.
436/2900 = 15% yield. Literally almost no one wants to be there. Meanwhile you have this:
https://provost.emory.edu/planning-administration/data/factbook/admissions.html
76% of the class were in top 10% of class rank and only 70% for Oxford. Emory/Oxford has never enrolled the top students and it never will.
Meanwhile Barnard:
https://barnard.edu/first-year-class-profile
91% in the top decile of their high school class rank (for those providing a class rank)
Testing Data (for those reporting under our test-optional policy)
SAT mid-50% range: 1470-1540