Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is an anonymous forum. “I’m from California” carries no weight. You could very well be from rural Idaho for all we know.

None of the dim Porter cheerleaders know anything about her actual record and policies and/or her actual constituents. They are obviously not Californians.

It’s a DC message board, big surprise there are non-Californians on here. It is a bit odd that the discussion is as active as it is, especially when the primary is months away. Seems like misogynist right wing trolls to me but I’m sure you Californians think it’s about policy.

Still no substantive answer. What has Katie Porter done for her constituents that means she should be California governor, such that we Californians should ignore this behavior when we vote?

Do your own research, Mr. “Californian.”

Uh, if you want me to vote for her in the governor’s race, and have no substantive reason why I should, the obvious conclusion is that the Californians who have pointed out her serious substantive flaws in this thread are correct, and you are both wrong and ignorant.

Here's what is obvious - there are no California voters looking at page 20 of a DCUM politics thread in order to decide whether or not to vote for Katie Porter.

You really don’t have any idea about any aspect of what Katie Porter has or hasn’t done for her constituents. Amazing.

It is quite amazing that no one is willing to accept your invitation to waste time. A+ trolling, "California voter."

The trolling here is from all the people who obviously know literally nothing about Katie Porter but think it’s somehow unfair that her temper tantrum with news reporter is actual news. That’s just such an absurdly childish approach that it has to be trolling.

I hope Becerra or one of the others mops the floor with her. Good riddance.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Awful personality is what we need about now.

Who is “we”?

I’m a CA voter, I know plenty of others.

Anonymous wrote:

When I heard her brag about how much money she had raised, I knew right then she was just another corrupt in it for the wrong reasons American politician beholden to the mega-donors of our two major political parties. She learned to play the money game from colleagues in Congress. Sickening.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is an anonymous forum. “I’m from California” carries no weight. You could very well be from rural Idaho for all we know.

None of the dim Porter cheerleaders know anything about her actual record and policies and/or her actual constituents. They are obviously not Californians.

It’s a DC message board, big surprise there are non-Californians on here. It is a bit odd that the discussion is as active as it is, especially when the primary is months away. Seems like misogynist right wing trolls to me but I’m sure you Californians think it’s about policy.

Still no substantive answer. What has Katie Porter done for her constituents that means she should be California governor, such that we Californians should ignore this behavior when we vote?

Do your own research, Mr. “Californian.”

Uh, if you want me to vote for her in the governor’s race, and have no substantive reason why I should, the obvious conclusion is that the Californians who have pointed out her serious substantive flaws in this thread are correct, and you are both wrong and ignorant.

Here's what is obvious - there are no California voters looking at page 20 of a DCUM politics thread in order to decide whether or not to vote for Katie Porter.

You really don’t have any idea about any aspect of what Katie Porter has or hasn’t done for her constituents. Amazing.

It is quite amazing that no one is willing to accept your invitation to waste time. A+ trolling, "California voter."

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is an anonymous forum. “I’m from California” carries no weight. You could very well be from rural Idaho for all we know.

None of the dim Porter cheerleaders know anything about her actual record and policies and/or her actual constituents. They are obviously not Californians.

What has she ever done for Maryland, DC, or Virginia?

She’s voted for policies that helped us. This is such a dumb argument. We’re all affected by who’s in Congress.

She’s running for governor of California. Do you understand that?

God, you’re insufferable. Did you know she was in Congress?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is an anonymous forum. “I’m from California” carries no weight. You could very well be from rural Idaho for all we know.

None of the dim Porter cheerleaders know anything about her actual record and policies and/or her actual constituents. They are obviously not Californians.

It’s a DC message board, big surprise there are non-Californians on here. It is a bit odd that the discussion is as active as it is, especially when the primary is months away. Seems like misogynist right wing trolls to me but I’m sure you Californians think it’s about policy.

Still no substantive answer. What has Katie Porter done for her constituents that means she should be California governor, such that we Californians should ignore this behavior when we vote?

Do your own research, Mr. “Californian.”

Uh, if you want me to vote for her in the governor’s race, and have no substantive reason why I should, the obvious conclusion is that the Californians who have pointed out her serious substantive flaws in this thread are correct, and you are both wrong and ignorant.

Here's what is obvious - there are no California voters looking at page 20 of a DCUM politics thread in order to decide whether or not to vote for Katie Porter.

You really don’t have any idea about any aspect of what Katie Porter has or hasn’t done for her constituents. Amazing.

Anonymous wrote:Media exposure is not her friend.

Katie Porter would be wise to go full Biden and head for her basement until after the election.

Not possible when running for California governor. The other candidates will be out and very visible.

Anonymous wrote:Media exposure is not her friend.

Katie Porter would be wise to go full Biden and head for her basement until after the election.

A feeble unfit elderly person running from their basement is capable of winning an election when their opponent is as awful and weak as Trump. Otherwise, real candidates running against legitimate opponents need to be able to speak coherently in front of the people.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is an anonymous forum. “I’m from California” carries no weight. You could very well be from rural Idaho for all we know.

None of the dim Porter cheerleaders know anything about her actual record and policies and/or her actual constituents. They are obviously not Californians.

It’s a DC message board, big surprise there are non-Californians on here. It is a bit odd that the discussion is as active as it is, especially when the primary is months away. Seems like misogynist right wing trolls to me but I’m sure you Californians think it’s about policy.

Still no substantive answer. What has Katie Porter done for her constituents that means she should be California governor, such that we Californians should ignore this behavior when we vote?

Do your own research, Mr. “Californian.”

Uh, if you want me to vote for her in the governor’s race, and have no substantive reason why I should, the obvious conclusion is that the Californians who have pointed out her serious substantive flaws in this thread are correct, and you are both wrong and ignorant.

Here's what is obvious - there are no California voters looking at page 20 of a DCUM politics thread in order to decide whether or not to vote for Katie Porter.

California has had mean governors before but you have to be thin and attractive. Newsome is mean af but looks like grown up Euphoria character.

Media exposure is not her friend.

Katie Porter would be wise to go full Biden and head for her basement until after the election.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is an anonymous forum. “I’m from California” carries no weight. You could very well be from rural Idaho for all we know.

None of the dim Porter cheerleaders know anything about her actual record and policies and/or her actual constituents. They are obviously not Californians.

It’s a DC message board, big surprise there are non-Californians on here. It is a bit odd that the discussion is as active as it is, especially when the primary is months away. Seems like misogynist right wing trolls to me but I’m sure you Californians think it’s about policy.

Still no substantive answer. What has Katie Porter done for her constituents that means she should be California governor, such that we Californians should ignore this behavior when we vote?

Do your own research, Mr. “Californian.”

Uh, if you want me to vote for her in the governor’s race, and have no substantive reason why I should, the obvious conclusion is that the Californians who have pointed out her serious substantive flaws in this thread are correct, and you are both wrong and ignorant.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is an anonymous forum. “I’m from California” carries no weight. You could very well be from rural Idaho for all we know.

None of the dim Porter cheerleaders know anything about her actual record and policies and/or her actual constituents. They are obviously not Californians.

It’s a DC message board, big surprise there are non-Californians on here. It is a bit odd that the discussion is as active as it is, especially when the primary is months away. Seems like misogynist right wing trolls to me but I’m sure you Californians think it’s about policy.

Still no substantive answer. What has Katie Porter done for her constituents that means she should be California governor, such that we Californians should ignore this behavior when we vote?

Do your own research, Mr. “Californian.”

Anonymous wrote:Awful personality is what we need about now.

Who is “we”?