Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:In 1980, autism was 2 per 10,000 births

In 2024, autism is 1 per 12 births

Not a shakedown OP.

How about maternal age having babies in your late 30's and 40's, eggs are way pass use by date.

How about paternal age, which has also been shown to be a high risk factor for autism?

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7396152/

Men need to stop having babies after age 35. Their sperm is past its sell by date.

Oh no, blaming men is not allowed. Only the women.

Oh right! I forgot that sperm is so powerful it alters the mother’s DNA forever, but if anything goes wrong with the baby it’s the woman’s fault.

We really need better sex ed in this country.

You are the only person saying that.

You must be new to the internet.

You must think that internet comments are some sort of representative sample of public sentiment.

A large number of people use the internet. A large number of people comment on the internet, even accounting for bots. So yes, it is a representative sample. Most of us aren’t going door to door polling for opinions.

That is some truly ignorant crap right there. No, some random corner of the internet is not a representative sample of the population. WTF. The stupidity of that comment is staggering.

Nobody said anything about “some random corner of the internet”. Calm down.

No, what you encounter on the internet does not constitute a statistically representative sample of the opinions of all people. I cannot even believe you think that it does.

You must be over 50, and/or entirely unaware of how extreme opinions get laundered into the mainstream.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:In 1980, autism was 2 per 10,000 births

In 2024, autism is 1 per 12 births

Not a shakedown OP.

How about maternal age having babies in your late 30's and 40's, eggs are way pass use by date.

How about paternal age, which has also been shown to be a high risk factor for autism?

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7396152/

Men need to stop having babies after age 35. Their sperm is past its sell by date.

Oh no, blaming men is not allowed. Only the women.

Oh right! I forgot that sperm is so powerful it alters the mother’s DNA forever, but if anything goes wrong with the baby it’s the woman’s fault.

We really need better sex ed in this country.

You are the only person saying that.

You must be new to the internet.

You must think that internet comments are some sort of representative sample of public sentiment.

A large number of people use the internet. A large number of people comment on the internet, even accounting for bots. So yes, it is a representative sample. Most of us aren’t going door to door polling for opinions.

That is some truly ignorant crap right there. No, some random corner of the internet is not a representative sample of the population. WTF. The stupidity of that comment is staggering.

Nobody said anything about “some random corner of the internet”. Calm down.

No, what you encounter on the internet does not constitute a statistically representative sample of the opinions of all people. I cannot even believe you think that it does.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:In 1980, autism was 2 per 10,000 births

In 2024, autism is 1 per 12 births

Not a shakedown OP.

How about maternal age having babies in your late 30's and 40's, eggs are way pass use by date.

How about paternal age, which has also been shown to be a high risk factor for autism?

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7396152/

Men need to stop having babies after age 35. Their sperm is past its sell by date.

Oh no, blaming men is not allowed. Only the women.

Oh right! I forgot that sperm is so powerful it alters the mother’s DNA forever, but if anything goes wrong with the baby it’s the woman’s fault.

We really need better sex ed in this country.

You are the only person saying that.

You must be new to the internet.

You must think that internet comments are some sort of representative sample of public sentiment.

A large number of people use the internet. A large number of people comment on the internet, even accounting for bots. So yes, it is a representative sample. Most of us aren’t going door to door polling for opinions.

You know ZERO, ZIP about what constitutes a "representative sample." Have you never taken statistics or been exposed to basic facts about how to construct a scientific study?

Your ignorance is only overshadowed by your excessive confidence in your uniformed opinions.

This entire year has been a stunning example of the Dunning-Kruger effect.

This all suggests a Countdown to Jenny McCarthy being appointed to HHS post by RFKJr

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:In 1980, autism was 2 per 10,000 births

In 2024, autism is 1 per 12 births

Not a shakedown OP.

How about maternal age having babies in your late 30's and 40's, eggs are way pass use by date.

How about paternal age, which has also been shown to be a high risk factor for autism?

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7396152/

Men need to stop having babies after age 35. Their sperm is past its sell by date.

Oh no, blaming men is not allowed. Only the women.

Oh right! I forgot that sperm is so powerful it alters the mother’s DNA forever, but if anything goes wrong with the baby it’s the woman’s fault.

We really need better sex ed in this country.

You are the only person saying that.

You must be new to the internet.

You must think that internet comments are some sort of representative sample of public sentiment.

A large number of people use the internet. A large number of people comment on the internet, even accounting for bots. So yes, it is a representative sample. Most of us aren’t going door to door polling for opinions.

That is some truly ignorant crap right there. No, some random corner of the internet is not a representative sample of the population. WTF. The stupidity of that comment is staggering.

Nobody said anything about “some random corner of the internet”. Calm down.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
"Hey, are our vaccinated children passing Hepatitis B around like the unvaccinated children around the world? No? Well, we should stop vaccinating them. Obviously they don't need it."

Absolute ninny logic.

t this point just surprised didn’t say with great emphasis and fanfare that they also discovered that don’t need chicken pox vax because children aren’t chickens

None of them have yet addressed why the outbreaks of these sorts of childhood diseases are full of overwhelmingly unvaccinated children. Why is that, exactly? Aren't their healthy diets and unvaccinated status supposed to protect them?

There must be a reason, some shared characteristic they have. Hmm. What a f'in puzzle for the ages.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:In 1980, autism was 2 per 10,000 births

In 2024, autism is 1 per 12 births

Not a shakedown OP.

How about maternal age having babies in your late 30's and 40's, eggs are way pass use by date.

How about paternal age, which has also been shown to be a high risk factor for autism?

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7396152/

Men need to stop having babies after age 35. Their sperm is past its sell by date.

Oh no, blaming men is not allowed. Only the women.

Oh right! I forgot that sperm is so powerful it alters the mother’s DNA forever, but if anything goes wrong with the baby it’s the woman’s fault.

We really need better sex ed in this country.

You are the only person saying that.

You must be new to the internet.

You must think that internet comments are some sort of representative sample of public sentiment.

A large number of people use the internet. A large number of people comment on the internet, even accounting for bots. So yes, it is a representative sample. Most of us aren’t going door to door polling for opinions.

You know ZERO, ZIP about what constitutes a "representative sample." Have you never taken statistics or been exposed to basic facts about how to construct a scientific study?

Your ignorance is only overshadowed by your excessive confidence in your uniformed opinions.

Anonymous wrote:Why do they let this stupid, uninformed person deliver medical advice on TV?

Something something Trump, Epstein, 12yos...

Anonymous wrote:
"Hey, are our vaccinated children passing Hepatitis B around like the unvaccinated children around the world? No? Well, we should stop vaccinating them. Obviously they don't need it."

Absolute ninny logic.

t this point just surprised didn’t say with great emphasis and fanfare that they also discovered that don’t need chicken pox vax because children aren’t chickens

"Hey, are our vaccinated children passing Hepatitis B around like the unvaccinated children around the world? No? Well, we should stop vaccinating them. Obviously they don't need it."

Absolute ninny logic.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:In 1980, autism was 2 per 10,000 births

In 2024, autism is 1 per 12 births

Not a shakedown OP.

How about maternal age having babies in your late 30's and 40's, eggs are way pass use by date.

How about paternal age, which has also been shown to be a high risk factor for autism?

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7396152/

Men need to stop having babies after age 35. Their sperm is past its sell by date.

Oh no, blaming men is not allowed. Only the women.

Oh right! I forgot that sperm is so powerful it alters the mother’s DNA forever, but if anything goes wrong with the baby it’s the woman’s fault.

We really need better sex ed in this country.

You are the only person saying that.

You must be new to the internet.

You must think that internet comments are some sort of representative sample of public sentiment.

A large number of people use the internet. A large number of people comment on the internet, even accounting for bots. So yes, it is a representative sample. Most of us aren’t going door to door polling for opinions.

That is some truly ignorant crap right there. No, some random corner of the internet is not a representative sample of the population. WTF. The stupidity of that comment is staggering.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why do they let this stupid, uninformed person deliver medical advice on TV?

Are you saying Hep B isn’t primarily transmitted sexually?

It most certainly isn't primarily transmitted sexually when there are a lot of people around who have it, particularly children.

Around the world, children with Hepatitis B infection have two main sources where they catch it: one is from the mother at birth, and the other is by playing with other children who are infected.

Are you saying three year olds are having sex with each other, or do you think birth is sexual intercourse between the mother and newborn? Which is it?

We’re talking about America here, not some jungle hovel. What’s the primary method of transmission in the US?

You're apparently trying to make it some jungle hovel. WHat, you think unvaccinated American children has a magic halo that will prevent them from catching it and spreading to each other?

If you have a bunch of delayed vaccinations, you will have a bunch of unprotected children. Household contact with an infected person is enough to pass it -- not just sitting next to another person, but sharing toothbrushes, cleaning up a nosebleed, having open mosquito bite sores.

Why do you think American children would be protected from passing it, just like they do around the world. If you DON'T want that to happen, why are you trying to get rid of the vaccination that makes us DIFFERENT from those areas of the world in transmission?

Anonymous wrote:In addition to all the other debunkings of 1-7 PP, autism diagnoses doubled from 2008 to 2018 (sample of 8 yr olds), before DSM-V was published.

So have ADHD and fibromyalgia and POTS. Much of it must be awareness. Also, environmental factors. But this admin is making air, water, air pollutants, and chemical exposure worse.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This presentation is simply an embarrassment.

He couldn’t pronounce the words

It’s pronounced Epsteinaminophen.

😆

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:In 1980, autism was 2 per 10,000 births

In 2024, autism is 1 per 12 births

Not a shakedown OP.

How about maternal age having babies in your late 30's and 40's, eggs are way pass use by date.

How about paternal age, which has also been shown to be a high risk factor for autism?

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7396152/

Men need to stop having babies after age 35. Their sperm is past its sell by date.

Oh no, blaming men is not allowed. Only the women.

Oh right! I forgot that sperm is so powerful it alters the mother’s DNA forever, but if anything goes wrong with the baby it’s the woman’s fault.

We really need better sex ed in this country.

You are the only person saying that.

You must be new to the internet.

You must think that internet comments are some sort of representative sample of public sentiment.

A large number of people use the internet. A large number of people comment on the internet, even accounting for bots. So yes, it is a representative sample. Most of us aren’t going door to door polling for opinions.