Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Has centerville been picked up by any major news source?
There is no Centerville in FCPS. Or Westfields. Way to demonstrate you probably aren’t even local.
Anonymous wrote:Has centerville been picked up by any major news source?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think she may be about to do something deeply unpopular (or take the blame for something deeply unpopular) and that's why they think she needs security. Let's wait and see what it is.
I suspect this is related to the "real" rezoning maps that are supposed to be released this month.
I did not think the next round of boundary maps were expected until October.
Look at the revised boundary review schedule:
https://www.fcps.edu/about-fcps/maps/2024-2026-boundary-review
The “final scenarios” are not even going to be developed until November, after the governor’s race and well after the September special election.
Yesterday someone posted that their post about DEI and boundary review was deleted. That post has since been deleted. That is interesting. The boundary review thread was recently locked when it came out that the Dem 11th district candidate in the September special election supports using One Fairfax for every decision and every policy. That would mean DEI based boundary review. Exactly in line with that candidate’s views.
If I were the Fairfax Dems (or FCPS…same thing, I realize), and I wanted to do DEI based boundary review, I would not want the 11th district candidate asked about it, or forced into making a statement that would tie FCPS hands later this year.
All signs point to a DEI based boundary review post November election. FCPS may believe a Dem in Richmond gives them a free hand.
Even so, I don’t think that warrants personal security for Reid.
Will Centreville impact the election the way Loudoun did four years ago?
No, Centerville won't because Fairfax County is ver blue and VERY pro abortion.
The centerville thing will likely increase votes for the democrats.
Anonymous wrote:Has centerville been picked up by any major news source?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think she may be about to do something deeply unpopular (or take the blame for something deeply unpopular) and that's why they think she needs security. Let's wait and see what it is.
I suspect this is related to the "real" rezoning maps that are supposed to be released this month.
I did not think the next round of boundary maps were expected until October.
Look at the revised boundary review schedule:
https://www.fcps.edu/about-fcps/maps/2024-2026-boundary-review
The “final scenarios” are not even going to be developed until November, after the governor’s race and well after the September special election.
Yesterday someone posted that their post about DEI and boundary review was deleted. That post has since been deleted. That is interesting. The boundary review thread was recently locked when it came out that the Dem 11th district candidate in the September special election supports using One Fairfax for every decision and every policy. That would mean DEI based boundary review. Exactly in line with that candidate’s views.
If I were the Fairfax Dems (or FCPS…same thing, I realize), and I wanted to do DEI based boundary review, I would not want the 11th district candidate asked about it, or forced into making a statement that would tie FCPS hands later this year.
All signs point to a DEI based boundary review post November election. FCPS may believe a Dem in Richmond gives them a free hand.
Even so, I don’t think that warrants personal security for Reid.
Will Centreville impact the election the way Loudoun did four years ago?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think she may be about to do something deeply unpopular (or take the blame for something deeply unpopular) and that's why they think she needs security. Let's wait and see what it is.
I suspect this is related to the "real" rezoning maps that are supposed to be released this month.
Anonymous wrote:Has centerville been picked up by any major news source?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Now they are saying 4 guards at 80k to 140k each
https://wjla.com/features/i-team/virginia-fairfax-county-public-schools-superintendent-michelle-reid-four-person-security-detail-bodyguard-cost-threats-executive-protection-agent-hire-uniformed-plain-clothed-officers-police-08-05-2025
"Due to some fast-evolving operational needs, I've had to accelerate the timeline for filling these roles," the second email reads.
Something is coming and it is going to be bad, real bad.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The job includes protection at home. WTF is going on and how could you hire one person for that? You hire a company and give people shifts, but this is fishy.
It won't be just one person.
Someone posted news outlet says is now 4 people- 2 shifts, I guess, with uniformed and 1 plain clothes at same same with her at all times
Anonymous wrote:If she resigns or is forced out, another win for Trump. The administration wants nothing more than to force out a bold superintendent and create internal chaos in a school district in Washington’s backyard that doesn’t comply with federal demands. The messages she sends standing up for fcps values is like waving a red flag in front of a bull. I wouldnt want her job.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The job includes protection at home. WTF is going on and how could you hire one person for that? You hire a company and give people shifts, but this is fishy.
It won't be just one person.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think she may be about to do something deeply unpopular (or take the blame for something deeply unpopular) and that's why they think she needs security. Let's wait and see what it is.
I suspect this is related to the "real" rezoning maps that are supposed to be released this month.
I did not think the next round of boundary maps were expected until October.
Look at the revised boundary review schedule:
https://www.fcps.edu/about-fcps/maps/2024-2026-boundary-review
The “final scenarios” are not even going to be developed until November, after the governor’s race and well after the September special election.
Yesterday someone posted that their post about DEI and boundary review was deleted. That post has since been deleted. That is interesting. The boundary review thread was recently locked when it came out that the Dem 11th district candidate in the September special election supports using One Fairfax for every decision and every policy. That would mean DEI based boundary review. Exactly in line with that candidate’s views.
If I were the Fairfax Dems (or FCPS…same thing, I realize), and I wanted to do DEI based boundary review, I would not want the 11th district candidate asked about it, or forced into making a statement that would tie FCPS hands later this year.
All signs point to a DEI based boundary review post November election. FCPS may believe a Dem in Richmond gives them a free hand.
Even so, I don’t think that warrants personal security for Reid.
Anonymous wrote:The job includes protection at home. WTF is going on and how could you hire one person for that? You hire a company and give people shifts, but this is fishy.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think she may be about to do something deeply unpopular (or take the blame for something deeply unpopular) and that's why they think she needs security. Let's wait and see what it is.
I suspect this is related to the "real" rezoning maps that are supposed to be released this month.
I did not think the next round of boundary maps were expected until October.
Look at the revised boundary review schedule:
https://www.fcps.edu/about-fcps/maps/2024-2026-boundary-review
The “final scenarios” are not even going to be developed until November, after the governor’s race and well after the September special election.
Yesterday someone posted that their post about DEI and boundary review was deleted. That post has since been deleted. That is interesting. The boundary review thread was recently locked when it came out that the Dem 11th district candidate in the September special election supports using One Fairfax for every decision and every policy. That would mean DEI based boundary review. Exactly in line with that candidate’s views.
If I were the Fairfax Dems (or FCPS…same thing, I realize), and I wanted to do DEI based boundary review, I would not want the 11th district candidate asked about it, or forced into making a statement that would tie FCPS hands later this year.
All signs point to a DEI based boundary review post November election. FCPS may believe a Dem in Richmond gives them a free hand.
Even so, I don’t think that warrants personal security for Reid.