We were told many times "no one is above the law". That means this Judge as well.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Her previous job was at Catholic Charities. Was she working with illegal immigrants coaching them on what to say at asylum hearings?

I hope so! You have a right to counsel in the Constitution

Not for civil violations you don’t.

So the government will arrest a lawyer for giving advice in civil cases? WTF! This is the world maga wants us to live in. Next Trump and maga will take our guns away.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

How is it obstruction when the Supreme Court said that applies to documents and evidence?

Can anyone explain this?

It is not a crime. The judge was arrested to suppress the rule of law.

Anonymous wrote:Someone, ehem, keep bringing in a S.court case that deals with congressional hearings and a very specific federal statute. PP : do you know how to ask this in AI? AI summary will answer your question.

Lawyers are obsolete now and no longer necessary to answer your questions

I do not know how to ask AI.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I read the criminal complaint.

Then you should know the SCOTUS Fischer decision won’t apply here.

Why not? It’s the same statute.

If you don’t live in the DC or MD or VA area and your kids don’t go to public schools it’s hard to understand the situation and pressures on our public resources.

More children using the seats in the classroom cause multiple issues. It’s real and you can imagine. I’d love a world where we can educate everyone— but we can’t. Maybe some guests should return if it is same for them to return. They can help rebuild their country and use the skills they learned in the
US. Our training and time to regroup will help them do that. I am happy we contributed to that county in that way.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Her previous job was at Catholic Charities. Was she working with illegal immigrants coaching them on what to say at asylum hearings?

I hope so! You have a right to counsel in the Constitution

Not for civil violations you don’t.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Her previous job was at Catholic Charities. Was she working with illegal immigrants coaching them on what to say at asylum hearings?

Was she a lawyer advising clients? So let me get this straight. You want to arrest lawyers giving advice to clients even though she is currently holding another job?

What the F? This is insane. Who are you people?

I'm saying a judge that will lead someone to escape from arrest by ICE, will probably be coaching people on what lies to tell to get asylum.
These asylum cases are mostly bogus.

If El Salvador is now safe. (Almost everyone agrees with this). So Why are there still people seeking refuge in the United States on safety claims. At what point do we say, “okay it’s safe to return because conditions have changed!” That country is a nice place to live now. Americans are going to beach resorts there, no kidding

True. Why not revoke TPS for 200,000+ Salvadorans so they can return to the “safest country in the Western Hemisphere”?

i mean part of me wants to book a ticket to get a cheap hotel rate before that policy takes place. The other part of me wants to wait bc there will be american trained service workers at those resorts/ It’s gonna be really nice. My friend goes to Panama but it seems so far —and it’s a little expensive now

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Her previous job was at Catholic Charities. Was she working with illegal immigrants coaching them on what to say at asylum hearings?

Was she a lawyer advising clients? So let me get this straight. You want to arrest lawyers giving advice to clients even though she is currently holding another job?

What the F? This is insane. Who are you people?

I'm saying a judge that will lead someone to escape from arrest by ICE, will probably be coaching people on what lies to tell to get asylum.
These asylum cases are mostly bogus.

If El Salvador is now safe. (Almost everyone agrees with this). So Why are there still people seeking refuge in the United States on safety claims. At what point do we say, “okay it’s safe to return because conditions have changed!” That country is a nice place to live now. Americans are going to beach resorts there, no kidding

They are economic migrants. Their asylum claims were always bogus. It’s laughable that we have illegals coming here “seeking asylum” in a country that has a far higher murder rate.

With that country I agree
People say they are afraid of gangsters I would be prone to believe that But now ALL those gangsters are in jail in el salvador. So what is going on and how long do we host people ?

Someone, ehem, keep bringing in a S.court case that deals with congressional hearings and a very specific federal statute. PP : do you know how to ask this in AI? AI summary will answer your question.

Lawyers are obsolete now and no longer necessary to answer your questions

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Her previous job was at Catholic Charities. Was she working with illegal immigrants coaching them on what to say at asylum hearings?

Was she a lawyer advising clients? So let me get this straight. You want to arrest lawyers giving advice to clients even though she is currently holding another job?

What the F? This is insane. Who are you people?

I'm saying a judge that will lead someone to escape from arrest by ICE, will probably be coaching people on what lies to tell to get asylum.
These asylum cases are mostly bogus.

If El Salvador is now safe. (Almost everyone agrees with this). So Why are there still people seeking refuge in the United States on safety claims. At what point do we say, “okay it’s safe to return because conditions have changed!” That country is a nice place to live now. Americans are going to beach resorts there, no kidding

True. Why not revoke TPS for 200,000+ Salvadorans so they can return to the “safest country in the Western Hemisphere”?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Her previous job was at Catholic Charities. Was she working with illegal immigrants coaching them on what to say at asylum hearings?

Was she a lawyer advising clients? So let me get this straight. You want to arrest lawyers giving advice to clients even though she is currently holding another job?

What the F? This is insane. Who are you people?

I'm saying a judge that will lead someone to escape from arrest by ICE, will probably be coaching people on what lies to tell to get asylum.
These asylum cases are mostly bogus.

If El Salvador is now safe. (Almost everyone agrees with this). So Why are there still people seeking refuge in the United States on safety claims. At what point do we say, “okay it’s safe to return because conditions have changed!” That country is a nice place to live now. Americans are going to beach resorts there, no kidding

They are economic migrants. Their asylum claims were always bogus. It’s laughable that we have illegals coming here “seeking asylum” in a country that has a far higher murder rate.

Anonymous wrote:

How is it obstruction when the Supreme Court said that applies to documents and evidence?

Can anyone explain this?

Anonymous wrote:I read the criminal complaint.

Then you should know the SCOTUS Fischer decision won’t apply here.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Her previous job was at Catholic Charities. Was she working with illegal immigrants coaching them on what to say at asylum hearings?

Was she a lawyer advising clients? So let me get this straight. You want to arrest lawyers giving advice to clients even though she is currently holding another job?

What the F? This is insane. Who are you people?

I'm saying a judge that will lead someone to escape from arrest by ICE, will probably be coaching people on what lies to tell to get asylum.
These asylum cases are mostly bogus.

If El Salvador is now safe. (Almost everyone agrees with this). So Why are there still people seeking refuge in the United States on safety claims. At what point do we say, “okay it’s safe to return because conditions have changed!” That country is a nice place to live now. Americans are going to beach resorts there, no kidding