The Kennedy hypers in this thread trying to make this a significant thing are hilarious!

Hmm. Billionaire creep Tim Mellon was RFK Jr’s only donor. And he gave Trump 50 million dollars. Could these two acts be related?

Now I understand precisely why Kamala Harris refused to allow Robert F. Kennedy Jr. in the debates.

That was absolutely a masterclass.

She’d have no way to answer.

For those of you who don’t understand math, this is very significant in the swing states.

This announcement on a Friday afternoon was also perfectly timed.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yeah, everyone I know who was going to vote for him was only planning to do so because they didn't want to vote for Biden or Trump.... I don't see people getting out of bed for this guy.

Lol. You don't know anyone who was going to vote for him. I attended one of his speeches, for sh ts and giggles, those supporters crossed the spectrum in a way I had not seen and they were serious about the ISSUES, they could care less about the party. They hate what has become of this government, therefore, a Trump vote is very likely.

They do know who votes for him. He drew more trump voters than Biden or Harris voters which is why he had to drop out. His job was to peel off democratic votes and he failed

His job was to debate and get the people's vote. I still do not understand if he hurt Trump so much why the Democrats fought so hard to keep him out of the debates. Let him debate if it helps Kamal, doesn't make sense.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If you want the Goverment to control what you eat- VOTE FOR TRUMP....

When I was a kid, the Republican party meant small government..

He wants to feed school children healthy food instead of processed foods.

I’m with Kennedy/Trump

? :lol: :lol: :lol: the man who loves Big Macs, and other fast foods? Um .. ok.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

BIGGER GOVERMENT?????????????????

Of we can merge, lay off and consolidate our government and reimagine HHS, it's possible that's where he's going with this, get those resumes working people!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yeah, everyone I know who was going to vote for him was only planning to do so because they didn't want to vote for Biden or Trump.... I don't see people getting out of bed for this guy.

Lol. You don't know anyone who was going to vote for him. I attended one of his speeches, for sh ts and giggles, those supporters crossed the spectrum in a way I had not seen and they were serious about the ISSUES, they could care less about the party. They hate what has become of this government, therefore, a Trump vote is very likely.

They do know who votes for him. He drew more trump voters than Biden or Harris voters which is why he had to drop out. His job was to peel off democratic votes and he failed

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yeah, everyone I know who was going to vote for him was only planning to do so because they didn't want to vote for Biden or Trump.... I don't see people getting out of bed for this guy.

Lol. You don't know anyone who was going to vote for him. I attended one of his speeches, for sh ts and giggles, those supporters crossed the spectrum in a way I had not seen and they were serious about the ISSUES, they could care less about the party. They hate what has become of this government, therefore, a Trump vote is very likely.

I do know because my family has a weird obsession with the Kennedys and would pretty much vote for their dog if he was ever on a ballot...... But after actually listening to him and realizing how batshit crazy that man is even my mom, die hard Kennedy fan, Said there was no way she was voting for him and was going to not vote this year.... Of course this was before Biden dropped out so I'm not sure if she's changed her mind on Kamala or not

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What about reproductive rights? That is the critical issue of this election. Why is he joining forces with the destructor of Roe?

Maybe because when looking at abortion, there is another human life who also has rights, and who should not be killed. Funny how pro choicers constantly talk about women's rights, but conviently ignore the rights of the human lives inside the women, half of whom are also females.

No one is having their "reproductive rights" taken away. You still have the right to reproduce. But not the right to take away human life.

Like typical "prolifers", you only care about the life from conception till birth.
After that, f' em, they're on their own.

Great logic: "I care about kids after they are born, so that means I am allowed to support the killing of kids before they are 'born'!"

dp.. so you agree that you don't really give AF about the kids once they are born.

At least Walz put his money where his mouth is by ensuring all school aged children have food while in school. What have MAGAts done about kids going hungry in school?

It's not about supporting your right to do what you want. It's about supporting *MY OWN RIGHT* to do what I want, and for my DD, as well. It's none of your dam* business what I or my DD does with our bodies. Stay out of our uterus.

I care about the rights and uteruses of the female babies you are killing. It is sad that you don't.

Not np. Personally I do not fall for the shiny object that is thrown out at every election cycle by the Democrats. No one gives two any's about your uteruses, but women fall for this hook, line and sinker every single time. Shiny objects, JFC.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What about reproductive rights? That is the critical issue of this election. Why is he joining forces with the destructor of Roe?

Maybe because when looking at abortion, there is another human life who also has rights, and who should not be killed. Funny how pro choicers constantly talk about women's rights, but conviently ignore the rights of the human lives inside the women, half of whom are also females.

No one is having their "reproductive rights" taken away. You still have the right to reproduce. But not the right to take away human life.

Like typical "prolifers", you only care about the life from conception till birth.
After that, f' em, they're on their own.

Great logic: "I care about kids after they are born, so that means I am allowed to support the killing of kids before they are 'born'!"

dp.. so you agree that you don't really give AF about the kids once they are born.

At least Walz put his money where his mouth is by ensuring all school aged children have food while in school. What have MAGAts done about kids going hungry in school?

It's not about supporting your right to do what you want. It's about supporting *MY OWN RIGHT* to do what I want, and for my DD, as well. It's none of your dam* business what I or my DD does with our bodies. Stay out of our uterus.

I care about the rights and uteruses of the female babies you are killing. It is sad that you don't.

You have every right to care. You have no right to interfere in someone else's medical situation.

Do you believe that abortion should be allowed up to birth?

NP: It is rare and not an issue worth focusing on IMO. Pro choice Trump supporter here. I don’t care if people have abortions but don’t want to pay for people’s kids- beyond minor temporary assistance- either. There are tons of people who share these views.

I’m sick of politicians (on whichever side) blowing so much time focusing on these very unusual abortion circumstances. There are far more important issues to worry about (and again, that goes for both sides).

I blame the “ religious right” for the whole abortion obsession and I am sick of this issue dominating political discourse.

I love how the Republicans seem to latch on to all of the democrat grifters.... Trump was famously a Democrat and said he would never be able to get far in that party because they were too smart.... So he grifted over to the Republicans..... It seems Bobby took a page out of his playbook.

Anonymous wrote:Yeah, everyone I know who was going to vote for him was only planning to do so because they didn't want to vote for Biden or Trump.... I don't see people getting out of bed for this guy.

Lol. You don't know anyone who was going to vote for him. I attended one of his speeches, for sh ts and giggles, those supporters crossed the spectrum in a way I had not seen and they were serious about the ISSUES, they could care less about the party. They hate what has become of this government, therefore, a Trump vote is very likely.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Unfortunately they don’t have any voters.

RFK does.

Not any more.

You didn’t listen to his speech.

He’s staying on the ballot in non battleground states

He’s asking his voters to select Trump in battleground states. He is having his name removed.

This is a brilliant tactic.

Lol. Brilliant? I will give that he understands trump cannot win the election by just attracting voters. His job to see if he can participate in some scheme to help get trump elected without just being able to attract voters. It will be a failed scheme. Nothing brilliant about it.