It's hard to turn down Harvard, but doing so for Bucknell would have been a smart move. Lewisburg is definitely an underrated college town, which I'm sure you regret missing out on for four years.Anonymous wrote:I went to Harvard and I regret it...wish I went to Bucknell.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I am a former investment banker. Not to be a snob, but the number of people who say they "work on Wall Street" and/or are "bankers" who are in middle office or back office jobs is huge. A huge percentage of the people at big banks are not generating any revenue. If you are not generating revenue, you are nobody. The revenue generators treat you like garbage. An MD in a revenue area makes a lot more than an MD in a non-revenue area. There is a lot of nuance.
But when you talk to your friends who aren't on Wall Street, they will think you are a big hitter. Especially if you tell them you work on Wall Street and act like you know about wine, golf, travel, and watches.
This. Hence the “Bucknell has a pipeline to the street” comments. Nothing wrong with middle office or commercial/private banking arms, but it isn’t all one and the same.
A middle office career on Wall Street is a dream for many kids.
I don't know the answer, but does a middle office career help you with placement following an MBA?
Years ago, my friend got an MBA at CMU and he said that the only kids struggling to get offers were former attorneys.
Trying to imagine what kid "dreams" of having a middle office role on Wall Street.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I am a former investment banker. Not to be a snob, but the number of people who say they "work on Wall Street" and/or are "bankers" who are in middle office or back office jobs is huge. A huge percentage of the people at big banks are not generating any revenue. If you are not generating revenue, you are nobody. The revenue generators treat you like garbage. An MD in a revenue area makes a lot more than an MD in a non-revenue area. There is a lot of nuance.
But when you talk to your friends who aren't on Wall Street, they will think you are a big hitter. Especially if you tell them you work on Wall Street and act like you know about wine, golf, travel, and watches.
This. Hence the “Bucknell has a pipeline to the street” comments. Nothing wrong with middle office or commercial/private banking arms, but it isn’t all one and the same.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Even if the destination is middle office, Bucknell is still a pipeline to the Street. On a risk-adjusted and effort-adjusted basis, the middle office wins. Only a tiny % of Goldman TMT analysts will ever make it to managing director and you have to work your tail off in perpetuity. Not true for middle office. This is the type of intelligence that Bucknell kids get as opposed to the brainwash to be dominant at Wharton and Harvard.
Lot of cheddar in the middle office. It's like being a plumber: may not be glamorous, but quietly assets accrue.
Anonymous wrote:Even if the destination is middle office, Bucknell is still a pipeline to the Street. On a risk-adjusted and effort-adjusted basis, the middle office wins. Only a tiny % of Goldman TMT analysts will ever make it to managing director and you have to work your tail off in perpetuity. Not true for middle office. This is the type of intelligence that Bucknell kids get as opposed to the brainwash to be dominant at Wharton and Harvard.
Anonymous wrote:NYU if you can afford it
A central park panhandler works on Wall Street and a back office banker is still a bankerAnonymous wrote:I am a former investment banker. Not to be a snob, but the number of people who say they "work on Wall Street" and/or are "bankers" who are in middle office or back office jobs is huge. A huge percentage of the people at big banks are not generating any revenue. If you are not generating revenue, you are nobody. The revenue generators treat you like garbage. An MD in a revenue area makes a lot more than an MD in a non-revenue area. There is a lot of nuance.
But when you talk to your friends who aren't on Wall Street, they will think you are a big hitter. Especially if you tell them you work on Wall Street and act like you know about wine, golf, travel, and watches.
Anonymous wrote:Even if the destination is middle office, Bucknell is still a pipeline to the Street. On a risk-adjusted and effort-adjusted basis, the middle office wins. Only a tiny % of Goldman TMT analysts will ever make it to managing director and you have to work your tail off in perpetuity. Not true for middle office. This is the type of intelligence that Bucknell kids get as opposed to the brainwash to be dominant at Wharton and Harvard.
Anonymous wrote:I am a former investment banker. Not to be a snob, but the number of people who say they "work on Wall Street" and/or are "bankers" who are in middle office or back office jobs is huge. A huge percentage of the people at big banks are not generating any revenue. If you are not generating revenue, you are nobody. The revenue generators treat you like garbage. An MD in a revenue area makes a lot more than an MD in a non-revenue area. There is a lot of nuance.
But when you talk to your friends who aren't on Wall Street, they will think you are a big hitter. Especially if you tell them you work on Wall Street and act like you know about wine, golf, travel, and watches.