Anonymous
Post 06/08/2024 18:39     Subject: Re:Overcrowding/Overenrollment Issues at top tier schools

Anonymous wrote:I went to a public R1, my wife to an LAC. We sent both our kids to an LAC. We felt the in classroom experience is better when classes are small; at our LAC, classes are capped at 35. We also think the out of classroom student-faculty experiences are more meaningful when there aren’t grad students or post docs to compete with. We felt research exposure was important but wanted it to prioritize undergrad involvement, which is the case at an LAC. Both our students have had far more interaction outside of class with profs than we think would’ve occurred at a university, even a private university, for academic research and other career-building opportunities. We also think college represents an important social networking opportunity and appreciated the requirement to live on campus all four years. In both their cases their social experiences picked up significantly in later years, so we're glad they were not limited to one or two years of on-campus housing.

That said, there are obvious name recognition and breadth of offering advantages at universities. There are also of course financial advantages for in-state publics. We would not have hesitated to send our kids to one of any number of amazing public universities if attending the LAC meant incurring significant debt.

In the end, this is a decision that comes down to a student’s specific situation and interests. In some cases a large public will make more sense, other times a private university, and other times an LAC. I think it’s fine for people to want to learn more about the pros/cons of each category or specific school as they research colleges. One need not take personally the fact that in some situations what was best for their family won’t be best for others.


Yea so private R1 university is the best.
Anonymous
Post 06/08/2024 17:22     Subject: Re:Overcrowding/Overenrollment Issues at top tier schools

I went to a public R1, my wife to an LAC. We sent both our kids to an LAC. We felt the in classroom experience is better when classes are small; at our LAC, classes are capped at 35. We also think the out of classroom student-faculty experiences are more meaningful when there aren’t grad students or post docs to compete with. We felt research exposure was important but wanted it to prioritize undergrad involvement, which is the case at an LAC. Both our students have had far more interaction outside of class with profs than we think would’ve occurred at a university, even a private university, for academic research and other career-building opportunities. We also think college represents an important social networking opportunity and appreciated the requirement to live on campus all four years. In both their cases their social experiences picked up significantly in later years, so we're glad they were not limited to one or two years of on-campus housing.

That said, there are obvious name recognition and breadth of offering advantages at universities. There are also of course financial advantages for in-state publics. We would not have hesitated to send our kids to one of any number of amazing public universities if attending the LAC meant incurring significant debt.

In the end, this is a decision that comes down to a student’s specific situation and interests. In some cases a large public will make more sense, other times a private university, and other times an LAC. I think it’s fine for people to want to learn more about the pros/cons of each category or specific school as they research colleges. One need not take personally the fact that in some situations what was best for their family won’t be best for others.
Anonymous
Post 06/08/2024 17:01     Subject: Overcrowding/Overenrollment Issues at top tier schools

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The UCs have gotten the most flak but it is pretty easy to find issue with any mega large state school. Take UFlorida. They don’t even guarantee on campus housing to freshman and offer a number of classes, including core business major classes, as online classes. The school actually offers a program to kids not offered regular admission where the entire first year of classes.

The big public classes do a decent job of educating at ton of in state at a relatively low price, Florida schools are often free to students with strong grades. But there are trade offs that often make the oos price unpalatable to some families.

I personally am not aware of similar complaints about Michigan other than it is difficult to be admitted to certain popular majors. Unlike the others, Michigan has a very large percentage oos students so perhaps they have the money and local cost of living that prevents some of these issues.


It's hard to believe OOS parents would opt to pay for this type of 'education' if you can even call it that. We all lived through online schooling during Covid. We all KNOW it is not comparable to being in class with peers. My DC goes to a private and while recorded sessions are an option to view later, Every. Single. Class. has been in person, and taught by a professor, never once in three years has it been a TA.


What is the size of the school where your kid goes? Where do they attend that they don’t have TAs? Name the school.

Some kids need a lot of hand holding and personal attention. Everyone learns differently. Some folks prefer in person, some prefer online, independent book based learning. Some prefer independent research with little instruction to learn. To each his/her own. However, just because you prefer in person, doesn’t mean it’s right for everyone.

That said, it is NOT just an OOS issue. IMO. - It is a large university issue. Large private schools use TAs and large lecture formats too. Johns Hopkins has lecture classes of 400+ students and that typically meet 1x week with TAs for discussion.

I've attended very large schools (including UCLA) and TAs don't teach classes. TAs only lead recitations and lab sections, as well as help with grading.

Many schools do use lecturers or adjuncts to teach classes. These folks generally have lower credentials than tenure track professors, though they are often better teachers with more interest in undergrad education. For example, my PhD advisor was a Nobel Laureate and god help any undergrads who had to take his course. He was both uninterested in teaching and incapable of explaining things to non-experts in the field. He's a fabulous scientist, but you'd be much better off with anyone else. Seriously.


TAs do teach classes. USNWR reported on schools with the highest percentage of classes with TAs as the primary instructor.

https://www.usnews.com/education/best-colleges/the-short-list-college/articles/2017-02-21/10-universities-where-tas-teach-the-most-classes


That report is from 2015.
DP


2017. But good point, Purdue has almost certainly replaced all 26% of classes taught by TAs as the primary instructor with tenure track faculty as the primary instructor since 2017. Same with every single one of the other schools listed.


The article was written in 2017 but the data is all from 2015.
“Below are the 10 National Universities with the highest percentage of graduate TAs listed as primary instructors for undergraduate courses in fall 2015.”


The PP said TAs don't teach classes. They article shows TAs at least did at a point in time, and in considerable numbers.
Anonymous
Post 06/08/2024 16:09     Subject: Overcrowding/Overenrollment Issues at top tier schools

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Omg this sounds awful.

I now understand why no kids from our private go to UCLA or Berkeley


They are great if you are In-state. But definately not worth OOS prices. If I'm paying $60K+, my kid will have smaller class and the ability to get the courses they need when they need them.



Let's be honest. They are not great in-state. The price is right for in-state. And the name is great on the diploma. But the student experience sux.


Except UCLA is an absolute monster when it comes to outlasting literally every other university in the country when it comes to the core student rankings, including quality of life and overall experience.

But yeah, other than that …

It’s still a public school so there’s that issue that’s not going away.


You say “still a public school” like you expect others to understand your apparent insinuation that it’s a place for the unwashed masses.



Yes - UCs are still public schools. The issues you cite as issues with public schools are the same issues at private schools. Loads of cited examples were provided.

You have a biased against public schools, fine. You pay your $400K. My kids have the option picking from publics or privates. 2 out of 2 so far have picked OOS publics. We’ve had great experiences so far and none of the issues. My kids are not at UCs so can’t speak to them, but at other states.
Anonymous
Post 06/08/2024 16:07     Subject: Overcrowding/Overenrollment Issues at top tier schools

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The UCs have gotten the most flak but it is pretty easy to find issue with any mega large state school. Take UFlorida. They don’t even guarantee on campus housing to freshman and offer a number of classes, including core business major classes, as online classes. The school actually offers a program to kids not offered regular admission where the entire first year of classes.

The big public classes do a decent job of educating at ton of in state at a relatively low price, Florida schools are often free to students with strong grades. But there are trade offs that often make the oos price unpalatable to some families.

I personally am not aware of similar complaints about Michigan other than it is difficult to be admitted to certain popular majors. Unlike the others, Michigan has a very large percentage oos students so perhaps they have the money and local cost of living that prevents some of these issues.


It's hard to believe OOS parents would opt to pay for this type of 'education' if you can even call it that. We all lived through online schooling during Covid. We all KNOW it is not comparable to being in class with peers. My DC goes to a private and while recorded sessions are an option to view later, Every. Single. Class. has been in person, and taught by a professor, never once in three years has it been a TA.


What is the size of the school where your kid goes? Where do they attend that they don’t have TAs? Name the school.

Some kids need a lot of hand holding and personal attention. Everyone learns differently. Some folks prefer in person, some prefer online, independent book based learning. Some prefer independent research with little instruction to learn. To each his/her own. However, just because you prefer in person, doesn’t mean it’s right for everyone.

That said, it is NOT just an OOS issue. IMO. - It is a large university issue. Large private schools use TAs and large lecture formats too. Johns Hopkins has lecture classes of 400+ students and that typically meet 1x week with TAs for discussion.

I've attended very large schools (including UCLA) and TAs don't teach classes. TAs only lead recitations and lab sections, as well as help with grading.

Many schools do use lecturers or adjuncts to teach classes. These folks generally have lower credentials than tenure track professors, though they are often better teachers with more interest in undergrad education. For example, my PhD advisor was a Nobel Laureate and god help any undergrads who had to take his course. He was both uninterested in teaching and incapable of explaining things to non-experts in the field. He's a fabulous scientist, but you'd be much better off with anyone else. Seriously.


TAs do teach classes. USNWR reported on schools with the highest percentage of classes with TAs as the primary instructor.

https://www.usnews.com/education/best-colleges/the-short-list-college/articles/2017-02-21/10-universities-where-tas-teach-the-most-classes


That report is from 2015.
DP


2017. But good point, Purdue has almost certainly replaced all 26% of classes taught by TAs as the primary instructor with tenure track faculty as the primary instructor since 2017. Same with every single one of the other schools listed.


Or perhaps the percentage of classes taught by TAs has grown to more than 26%. Considering the Purdue student to faculty ratio has grown from 12:1 (2014-15 CDS) to 14:1 (2021-22), I think it’s more likely to have grown than shrank.

Anonymous
Post 06/08/2024 16:00     Subject: Overcrowding/Overenrollment Issues at top tier schools

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The UCs have gotten the most flak but it is pretty easy to find issue with any mega large state school. Take UFlorida. They don’t even guarantee on campus housing to freshman and offer a number of classes, including core business major classes, as online classes. The school actually offers a program to kids not offered regular admission where the entire first year of classes.

The big public classes do a decent job of educating at ton of in state at a relatively low price, Florida schools are often free to students with strong grades. But there are trade offs that often make the oos price unpalatable to some families.

I personally am not aware of similar complaints about Michigan other than it is difficult to be admitted to certain popular majors. Unlike the others, Michigan has a very large percentage oos students so perhaps they have the money and local cost of living that prevents some of these issues.


It's hard to believe OOS parents would opt to pay for this type of 'education' if you can even call it that. We all lived through online schooling during Covid. We all KNOW it is not comparable to being in class with peers. My DC goes to a private and while recorded sessions are an option to view later, Every. Single. Class. has been in person, and taught by a professor, never once in three years has it been a TA.


What is the size of the school where your kid goes? Where do they attend that they don’t have TAs? Name the school.

Some kids need a lot of hand holding and personal attention. Everyone learns differently. Some folks prefer in person, some prefer online, independent book based learning. Some prefer independent research with little instruction to learn. To each his/her own. However, just because you prefer in person, doesn’t mean it’s right for everyone.

That said, it is NOT just an OOS issue. IMO. - It is a large university issue. Large private schools use TAs and large lecture formats too. Johns Hopkins has lecture classes of 400+ students and that typically meet 1x week with TAs for discussion.

I've attended very large schools (including UCLA) and TAs don't teach classes. TAs only lead recitations and lab sections, as well as help with grading.

Many schools do use lecturers or adjuncts to teach classes. These folks generally have lower credentials than tenure track professors, though they are often better teachers with more interest in undergrad education. For example, my PhD advisor was a Nobel Laureate and god help any undergrads who had to take his course. He was both uninterested in teaching and incapable of explaining things to non-experts in the field. He's a fabulous scientist, but you'd be much better off with anyone else. Seriously.


TAs do teach classes. USNWR reported on schools with the highest percentage of classes with TAs as the primary instructor.

https://www.usnews.com/education/best-colleges/the-short-list-college/articles/2017-02-21/10-universities-where-tas-teach-the-most-classes


That report is from 2015.
DP


2017. But good point, Purdue has almost certainly replaced all 26% of classes taught by TAs as the primary instructor with tenure track faculty as the primary instructor since 2017. Same with every single one of the other schools listed.


The article was written in 2017 but the data is all from 2015.
“Below are the 10 National Universities with the highest percentage of graduate TAs listed as primary instructors for undergraduate courses in fall 2015.”
Anonymous
Post 06/08/2024 15:04     Subject: Overcrowding/Overenrollment Issues at top tier schools

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The UCs have gotten the most flak but it is pretty easy to find issue with any mega large state school. Take UFlorida. They don’t even guarantee on campus housing to freshman and offer a number of classes, including core business major classes, as online classes. The school actually offers a program to kids not offered regular admission where the entire first year of classes.

The big public classes do a decent job of educating at ton of in state at a relatively low price, Florida schools are often free to students with strong grades. But there are trade offs that often make the oos price unpalatable to some families.

I personally am not aware of similar complaints about Michigan other than it is difficult to be admitted to certain popular majors. Unlike the others, Michigan has a very large percentage oos students so perhaps they have the money and local cost of living that prevents some of these issues.


It's hard to believe OOS parents would opt to pay for this type of 'education' if you can even call it that. We all lived through online schooling during Covid. We all KNOW it is not comparable to being in class with peers. My DC goes to a private and while recorded sessions are an option to view later, Every. Single. Class. has been in person, and taught by a professor, never once in three years has it been a TA.


What is the size of the school where your kid goes? Where do they attend that they don’t have TAs? Name the school.

Some kids need a lot of hand holding and personal attention. Everyone learns differently. Some folks prefer in person, some prefer online, independent book based learning. Some prefer independent research with little instruction to learn. To each his/her own. However, just because you prefer in person, doesn’t mean it’s right for everyone.

That said, it is NOT just an OOS issue. IMO. - It is a large university issue. Large private schools use TAs and large lecture formats too. Johns Hopkins has lecture classes of 400+ students and that typically meet 1x week with TAs for discussion.

I've attended very large schools (including UCLA) and TAs don't teach classes. TAs only lead recitations and lab sections, as well as help with grading.

Many schools do use lecturers or adjuncts to teach classes. These folks generally have lower credentials than tenure track professors, though they are often better teachers with more interest in undergrad education. For example, my PhD advisor was a Nobel Laureate and god help any undergrads who had to take his course. He was both uninterested in teaching and incapable of explaining things to non-experts in the field. He's a fabulous scientist, but you'd be much better off with anyone else. Seriously.


TAs do teach classes. USNWR reported on schools with the highest percentage of classes with TAs as the primary instructor.

https://www.usnews.com/education/best-colleges/the-short-list-college/articles/2017-02-21/10-universities-where-tas-teach-the-most-classes


That report is from 2015.
DP


2017. But good point, Purdue has almost certainly replaced all 26% of classes taught by TAs as the primary instructor with tenure track faculty as the primary instructor since 2017. Same with every single one of the other schools listed.
Anonymous
Post 06/08/2024 10:44     Subject: Overcrowding/Overenrollment Issues at top tier schools

Tulane is now requiring incoming students to live on campus for 3 years. They have built a ton of new dorms in the last few year and are currently building more. They are tearing down the old ones and replacing them with modern dorms. It is pretty impressive.
Anonymous
Post 06/08/2024 10:26     Subject: Overcrowding/Overenrollment Issues at top tier schools

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:This is a public school problem.


Boston University and Northeastern University both had to use hotels a couple of years ago because they were overbooked. Not sure if they resolved the problem.


Northeastern had a big increase in yield rate 3-4 years ago.
My kid was in a forced triple for the first year, but then had a nice air-conditioned single room for the past two years.
They leased dorms from WIT which is literally right next to each other and also adding new new buildings.
https://huntnewsnu.com/76391/campus/administration/northeastern-receives-go-ahead-to-build-1370-bed-residence-hall-on-columbus-avenue/

Anonymous
Post 06/08/2024 10:19     Subject: Overcrowding/Overenrollment Issues at top tier schools

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:This is a public school problem.


Boston University and Northeastern University both had to use hotels a couple of years ago because they were overbooked. Not sure if they resolved the problem.



DD is a current student at BU. I don't see any housing issues currently, unless I'm unaware of them. There are some old buildings, but there are plans to remodel them soon.

For me, I'm really happy about the 4-year housing guarantee, so I don't have the pressure of having to find an off-campus apartment.
Anonymous
Post 06/08/2024 01:29     Subject: Overcrowding/Overenrollment Issues at top tier schools

Anonymous wrote:This is a public school problem.


Boston University and Northeastern University both had to use hotels a couple of years ago because they were overbooked. Not sure if they resolved the problem.
Anonymous
Post 06/08/2024 01:19     Subject: Overcrowding/Overenrollment Issues at top tier schools

Anonymous wrote:And as noted on a earlier page, Wesleyan has struggled with housing issues. Wes also had to resort to double rooms becoming triples and having to take over a hotel to accommoade its students.


What the 2 to 3 in a room tells me to is that in some years 2 students get to live in a room the fire codes say are big enough for 3. That it would vary between 2 and 3 for some rooms isn’t surprising since yields vary a bit too.

The hotel might’ve similarly happened because of an unexpectedly high yield or simply a renovation project that put a dorm offline some year. That’s not a big deal, and kind of expected to happen in limited amounts on occasion.

No one said that smaller schools having less of a crowding issue means they always have everything the way they ideally want. The just have fewer, less impactful issues. Wesleyan wouldn’t require four years of on-campus if they had a recurring, serious capacity issue.

https://www.wesleyan.edu/reslife/ugrad_housing/index.html#:~:text=Undergraduate%20students%20are%20required%20to,through%20their%20time%20at%20Wesleyan.

As for courses, 97% have under 40 students at Wesleyan.

https://www.wesleyan.edu/ir/data-sets/CDS_2022-2023.pdf

Everyone agrees all colleges have problems. But an undergraduate-focused, residential LAC like Wesleyan will have fewer overcrowding issues than a larger university. My kid doesn’t go there but to a peer LAC with the same attributes. That said, there are different things the larger schools will be more likely to excel at.
Anonymous
Post 06/08/2024 00:15     Subject: Overcrowding/Overenrollment Issues at top tier schools

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Omg this sounds awful.

I now understand why no kids from our private go to UCLA or Berkeley


They are great if you are In-state. But definately not worth OOS prices. If I'm paying $60K+, my kid will have smaller class and the ability to get the courses they need when they need them.



Let's be honest. They are not great in-state. The price is right for in-state. And the name is great on the diploma. But the student experience sux.


Except UCLA is an absolute monster when it comes to outlasting literally every other university in the country when it comes to the core student rankings, including quality of life and overall experience.

But yeah, other than that …

It’s still a public school so there’s that issue that’s not going away.


You say “still a public school” like you expect others to understand your apparent insinuation that it’s a place for the unwashed masses.
Anonymous
Post 06/07/2024 23:49     Subject: Overcrowding/Overenrollment Issues at top tier schools

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Omg this sounds awful.

I now understand why no kids from our private go to UCLA or Berkeley


They are great if you are In-state. But definately not worth OOS prices. If I'm paying $60K+, my kid will have smaller class and the ability to get the courses they need when they need them.



Let's be honest. They are not great in-state. The price is right for in-state. And the name is great on the diploma. But the student experience sux.


Except UCLA is an absolute monster when it comes to outlasting literally every other university in the country when it comes to the core student rankings, including quality of life and overall experience.

But yeah, other than that …

It’s still a public school so there’s that issue that’s not going away.
Anonymous
Post 06/07/2024 23:46     Subject: Overcrowding/Overenrollment Issues at top tier schools

Anonymous wrote:Oh and the Tufts housing crisis in 1987 had doubles converted to triples. Sound familiar….


No one cares what happened in 1987, half the people posting here weren’t even born,