Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Truth Social is about to go public any moment now, right? Will Trump be able to use that as a piggy bank?

No, it’s on hold because the founders have sued Trump because they say he tried to take more of their tiny slice than the deal allowed. Can’t make this sh!t up.

“The co-founders’ lawsuit is led by Andy Litinsky and Wes Moss, who met Trump as contestants on his reality show “The Apprentice.” The men pitched Trump on the idea of a Trump-branded tech start-up and social media platform in early 2021 after he lost the White House and was banned from Twitter, now called X.

Trump agreed to the deal and was given 90 percent of the company, according to a motion for expedited proceedings filed Wednesday in the Delaware Court of Chancery by the co-founders’ partnership, United Atlantic Ventures. The partnership took 8.6 percent, while an attorney on the deal, Bradford Cohen, was given the remaining 1.4 percent, the motion states.
UAV launched the Trump Media business, hired employees and raised funding while receiving no “fee or payment for its work,” the motion said. And though Litinsky and Moss left Trump Media that year amid a dispute with its current leadership, UAV retained its shares, according to a SEC filing this month from Digital World.
The filing said that Trump was set to receive 78 million shares in the post-merger company — a stake worth more than $3 billion at Thursday’s share price — and that UAV would receive more than 7 million shares, a stake worth nearly $300 million. “Throughout TMTG’s corporate history,” the motion states, “UAV’s 8.6 percent ownership interest has been recognized and honored.”

But UAV’s attorneys allege in the motion that Trump has recently attempted to “drastically dilute” the partnership’s stake as part of what they called an “11th hour, pre-merger corporate maneuvering” tactic designed to increase the amount of authorized stock, from 120 million shares to 1 billion shares.

UAV’s attorneys wrote that the “dilution scheme” had “no legitimate business purpose” and suggested that Trump and the Trump Media board planned to issue the new shares to “Trump and/or his associates and children,” watering down UAV’s stake to less than 1 percent.

UAV was “promised 8.6 percent of this company and sadly its business partners are baselessly trying to renege,” said the partnership’s lead attorney, Christopher J. Clark of Clark Smith Villazor, in an interview with The Washington Post describing the lawsuit. “They feel like: We made Truth Social for you. You get 90 percent. But some people just aren’t happy with 90 percent.”

https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2024/02/29/truth-social-lawsuit-trump-media-founders/

Trump steals everything.

Wants to be president again to stay out of jail, retribution and enrich himself. No where is he “fighting for the forgotten man.” Please MAGA, open your eyes.👀

Anonymous wrote:I may actually vote for Trump solely because of what NY is doing to him. Which is outrageous. It's nothing more than destroying the integrity of America's legal systems to punish him out of vengeance. I thought this kind of crap only happened in Russia or Turkey.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Truth Social is about to go public any moment now, right? Will Trump be able to use that as a piggy bank?

No, it’s on hold because the founders have sued Trump because they say he tried to take more of their tiny slice than the deal allowed. Can’t make this sh!t up.

“The co-founders’ lawsuit is led by Andy Litinsky and Wes Moss, who met Trump as contestants on his reality show “The Apprentice.” The men pitched Trump on the idea of a Trump-branded tech start-up and social media platform in early 2021 after he lost the White House and was banned from Twitter, now called X.

Trump agreed to the deal and was given 90 percent of the company, according to a motion for expedited proceedings filed Wednesday in the Delaware Court of Chancery by the co-founders’ partnership, United Atlantic Ventures. The partnership took 8.6 percent, while an attorney on the deal, Bradford Cohen, was given the remaining 1.4 percent, the motion states.
UAV launched the Trump Media business, hired employees and raised funding while receiving no “fee or payment for its work,” the motion said. And though Litinsky and Moss left Trump Media that year amid a dispute with its current leadership, UAV retained its shares, according to a SEC filing this month from Digital World.
The filing said that Trump was set to receive 78 million shares in the post-merger company — a stake worth more than $3 billion at Thursday’s share price — and that UAV would receive more than 7 million shares, a stake worth nearly $300 million. “Throughout TMTG’s corporate history,” the motion states, “UAV’s 8.6 percent ownership interest has been recognized and honored.”

But UAV’s attorneys allege in the motion that Trump has recently attempted to “drastically dilute” the partnership’s stake as part of what they called an “11th hour, pre-merger corporate maneuvering” tactic designed to increase the amount of authorized stock, from 120 million shares to 1 billion shares.

UAV’s attorneys wrote that the “dilution scheme” had “no legitimate business purpose” and suggested that Trump and the Trump Media board planned to issue the new shares to “Trump and/or his associates and children,” watering down UAV’s stake to less than 1 percent.

UAV was “promised 8.6 percent of this company and sadly its business partners are baselessly trying to renege,” said the partnership’s lead attorney, Christopher J. Clark of Clark Smith Villazor, in an interview with The Washington Post describing the lawsuit. “They feel like: We made Truth Social for you. You get 90 percent. But some people just aren’t happy with 90 percent.”

https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2024/02/29/truth-social-lawsuit-trump-media-founders/

Trump steals everything.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Truth Social is about to go public any moment now, right? Will Trump be able to use that as a piggy bank?

No, it’s on hold because the founders have sued Trump because they say he tried to take more of their tiny slice than the deal allowed. Can’t make this sh!t up.

“The co-founders’ lawsuit is led by Andy Litinsky and Wes Moss, who met Trump as contestants on his reality show “The Apprentice.” The men pitched Trump on the idea of a Trump-branded tech start-up and social media platform in early 2021 after he lost the White House and was banned from Twitter, now called X.

Trump agreed to the deal and was given 90 percent of the company, according to a motion for expedited proceedings filed Wednesday in the Delaware Court of Chancery by the co-founders’ partnership, United Atlantic Ventures. The partnership took 8.6 percent, while an attorney on the deal, Bradford Cohen, was given the remaining 1.4 percent, the motion states.
UAV launched the Trump Media business, hired employees and raised funding while receiving no “fee or payment for its work,” the motion said. And though Litinsky and Moss left Trump Media that year amid a dispute with its current leadership, UAV retained its shares, according to a SEC filing this month from Digital World.
The filing said that Trump was set to receive 78 million shares in the post-merger company — a stake worth more than $3 billion at Thursday’s share price — and that UAV would receive more than 7 million shares, a stake worth nearly $300 million. “Throughout TMTG’s corporate history,” the motion states, “UAV’s 8.6 percent ownership interest has been recognized and honored.”

But UAV’s attorneys allege in the motion that Trump has recently attempted to “drastically dilute” the partnership’s stake as part of what they called an “11th hour, pre-merger corporate maneuvering” tactic designed to increase the amount of authorized stock, from 120 million shares to 1 billion shares.

UAV’s attorneys wrote that the “dilution scheme” had “no legitimate business purpose” and suggested that Trump and the Trump Media board planned to issue the new shares to “Trump and/or his associates and children,” watering down UAV’s stake to less than 1 percent.

UAV was “promised 8.6 percent of this company and sadly its business partners are baselessly trying to renege,” said the partnership’s lead attorney, Christopher J. Clark of Clark Smith Villazor, in an interview with The Washington Post describing the lawsuit. “They feel like: We made Truth Social for you. You get 90 percent. But some people just aren’t happy with 90 percent.”

https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2024/02/29/truth-social-lawsuit-trump-media-founders/

Trump steals everything.

Wow--that was the billions people were saying he would have any minute to pay the court.
This guy has an addiction problem and getting desperate for a fix.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Truth Social is about to go public any moment now, right? Will Trump be able to use that as a piggy bank?

No, it’s on hold because the founders have sued Trump because they say he tried to take more of their tiny slice than the deal allowed. Can’t make this sh!t up.

“The co-founders’ lawsuit is led by Andy Litinsky and Wes Moss, who met Trump as contestants on his reality show “The Apprentice.” The men pitched Trump on the idea of a Trump-branded tech start-up and social media platform in early 2021 after he lost the White House and was banned from Twitter, now called X.

Trump agreed to the deal and was given 90 percent of the company, according to a motion for expedited proceedings filed Wednesday in the Delaware Court of Chancery by the co-founders’ partnership, United Atlantic Ventures. The partnership took 8.6 percent, while an attorney on the deal, Bradford Cohen, was given the remaining 1.4 percent, the motion states.
UAV launched the Trump Media business, hired employees and raised funding while receiving no “fee or payment for its work,” the motion said. And though Litinsky and Moss left Trump Media that year amid a dispute with its current leadership, UAV retained its shares, according to a SEC filing this month from Digital World.
The filing said that Trump was set to receive 78 million shares in the post-merger company — a stake worth more than $3 billion at Thursday’s share price — and that UAV would receive more than 7 million shares, a stake worth nearly $300 million. “Throughout TMTG’s corporate history,” the motion states, “UAV’s 8.6 percent ownership interest has been recognized and honored.”

But UAV’s attorneys allege in the motion that Trump has recently attempted to “drastically dilute” the partnership’s stake as part of what they called an “11th hour, pre-merger corporate maneuvering” tactic designed to increase the amount of authorized stock, from 120 million shares to 1 billion shares.

UAV’s attorneys wrote that the “dilution scheme” had “no legitimate business purpose” and suggested that Trump and the Trump Media board planned to issue the new shares to “Trump and/or his associates and children,” watering down UAV’s stake to less than 1 percent.

UAV was “promised 8.6 percent of this company and sadly its business partners are baselessly trying to renege,” said the partnership’s lead attorney, Christopher J. Clark of Clark Smith Villazor, in an interview with The Washington Post describing the lawsuit. “They feel like: We made Truth Social for you. You get 90 percent. But some people just aren’t happy with 90 percent.”

https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2024/02/29/truth-social-lawsuit-trump-media-founders/

Trump steals everything.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Trump is 77 years old. I am sure he did not turn fraud in last two years. But why are so many cases against him only in the last couple of years? Clearly the opposition is trying to get him. There is a collusion among people in power to eliminate Trump even by unethical means. Half the country loves him regardless of his character. And we should allow the people to decide whom they want. Flooding the country with illegals, changing the demography to favor a party and using any means to bring down a political opponent is much worse than what Trump has ever done!

None of those "illegals" are able to vote, no matter how much you claim they will.

And you are basically saying that criminals should not be held accountable for their crimes as long as they are popular.

That is what many refer to as a two-tiered justice system and is not how a country founded on the rule of law is supposed to operate.

And Trump's crimes didn't start in the last two years.

He was has been found guilty of housing discrimination, of laundering money, of committing fraud on behalf of Trump U, Trump foundation and now Trump Org.

Do you not know this?

Looks like my message has been deleted. Not sure why.
I am not saying criminals should not be accountable. I am saying opposition is after Trump last couple of years. If he was a fraud, the court cases should have been happening well before that. It clearly shows that it’s politically motivated. If he was a criminal he should have paid for his crimes 10 years ago, 15 years ago. That did not happen.

There are 2 things:
1) Deep state does not like him
2) Half the country love him in spite of everything and want him back

So if the people want him as President, then deep state has to get him out by other means

No absolutely false.

Trump has been civilly charged.
Trump University, Trump Foundation, Trump illegal teen modeling (outrage conservatives) not charge he shut it down right before, Trump water, many many times with judgments against him. He stole from St Judes got a huge fine and was never to open a charity again. And yes SDNY gave him many passes every time he donated to the Prosecutor's political funds, ask Cy Vance.

This particular judgment today has forensic accountants, so you think those people lied under oath? Do you think Judge Ergeon just picked a number out of a hat? Learn to read. The facts are on the internet, the case is in-depth on the internet. It's a Ponzi scheme that always has been. He lied over and over again. He overvalued his properties. FACT.

Let's look at Trump's criminal past.
Regarding the various irregularities in the Trump Foundation, former head of the Internal Revenue Service's Office of Exempt Organizations Division Marc Owens told The Washington Post that he was surprised by the "laundry list of issues".

The office of New York State Attorney General Eric Schneiderman investigated the foundation "to make sure it's complying with the laws governing charities in New York." The Trump Foundation was found to have committed fraud and misappropriated funds and was ordered to be shut down.

Trump University
The settlement allots $21 million in funds to the students who were defrauded by Trump University. Yeah, he did nothing wrong.

I could keep going but you are too stupid to read cognitively given you support a criminal.

You could go on but fact of the matter is it’s not a good look for the system to run against one person at exactly when he is trying to re-run for President. My question again if he is a criminal for last 50 years, why now he has been charged? We did not see this in 2016. Open your eyes, by hook or crook they want this man out. And I am against this. I am not a Trump supporter but aghast at how the greatest democracy in the world wants a candidate out because he is not a good look for the country. And thereby making themselves not look good for the rest of the world.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Truth Social is about to go public any moment now, right? Will Trump be able to use that as a piggy bank?

No, it’s on hold because the founders have sued Trump because they say he tried to take more of their tiny slice than the deal allowed. Can’t make this sh!t up.

“The co-founders’ lawsuit is led by Andy Litinsky and Wes Moss, who met Trump as contestants on his reality show “The Apprentice.” The men pitched Trump on the idea of a Trump-branded tech start-up and social media platform in early 2021 after he lost the White House and was banned from Twitter, now called X.

Trump agreed to the deal and was given 90 percent of the company, according to a motion for expedited proceedings filed Wednesday in the Delaware Court of Chancery by the co-founders’ partnership, United Atlantic Ventures. The partnership took 8.6 percent, while an attorney on the deal, Bradford Cohen, was given the remaining 1.4 percent, the motion states.
UAV launched the Trump Media business, hired employees and raised funding while receiving no “fee or payment for its work,” the motion said. And though Litinsky and Moss left Trump Media that year amid a dispute with its current leadership, UAV retained its shares, according to a SEC filing this month from Digital World.
The filing said that Trump was set to receive 78 million shares in the post-merger company — a stake worth more than $3 billion at Thursday’s share price — and that UAV would receive more than 7 million shares, a stake worth nearly $300 million. “Throughout TMTG’s corporate history,” the motion states, “UAV’s 8.6 percent ownership interest has been recognized and honored.”

But UAV’s attorneys allege in the motion that Trump has recently attempted to “drastically dilute” the partnership’s stake as part of what they called an “11th hour, pre-merger corporate maneuvering” tactic designed to increase the amount of authorized stock, from 120 million shares to 1 billion shares.

UAV’s attorneys wrote that the “dilution scheme” had “no legitimate business purpose” and suggested that Trump and the Trump Media board planned to issue the new shares to “Trump and/or his associates and children,” watering down UAV’s stake to less than 1 percent.

UAV was “promised 8.6 percent of this company and sadly its business partners are baselessly trying to renege,” said the partnership’s lead attorney, Christopher J. Clark of Clark Smith Villazor, in an interview with The Washington Post describing the lawsuit. “They feel like: We made Truth Social for you. You get 90 percent. But some people just aren’t happy with 90 percent.”

https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2024/02/29/truth-social-lawsuit-trump-media-founders/

Trump steals everything.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Truth Social is about to go public any moment now, right? Will Trump be able to use that as a piggy bank?

No, it’s on hold because the founders have sued Trump because they say he tried to take more of their tiny slice than the deal allowed. Can’t make this sh!t up.

“The co-founders’ lawsuit is led by Andy Litinsky and Wes Moss, who met Trump as contestants on his reality show “The Apprentice.” The men pitched Trump on the idea of a Trump-branded tech start-up and social media platform in early 2021 after he lost the White House and was banned from Twitter, now called X.

Trump agreed to the deal and was given 90 percent of the company, according to a motion for expedited proceedings filed Wednesday in the Delaware Court of Chancery by the co-founders’ partnership, United Atlantic Ventures. The partnership took 8.6 percent, while an attorney on the deal, Bradford Cohen, was given the remaining 1.4 percent, the motion states.
UAV launched the Trump Media business, hired employees and raised funding while receiving no “fee or payment for its work,” the motion said. And though Litinsky and Moss left Trump Media that year amid a dispute with its current leadership, UAV retained its shares, according to a SEC filing this month from Digital World.
The filing said that Trump was set to receive 78 million shares in the post-merger company — a stake worth more than $3 billion at Thursday’s share price — and that UAV would receive more than 7 million shares, a stake worth nearly $300 million. “Throughout TMTG’s corporate history,” the motion states, “UAV’s 8.6 percent ownership interest has been recognized and honored.”

But UAV’s attorneys allege in the motion that Trump has recently attempted to “drastically dilute” the partnership’s stake as part of what they called an “11th hour, pre-merger corporate maneuvering” tactic designed to increase the amount of authorized stock, from 120 million shares to 1 billion shares.

UAV’s attorneys wrote that the “dilution scheme” had “no legitimate business purpose” and suggested that Trump and the Trump Media board planned to issue the new shares to “Trump and/or his associates and children,” watering down UAV’s stake to less than 1 percent.

UAV was “promised 8.6 percent of this company and sadly its business partners are baselessly trying to renege,” said the partnership’s lead attorney, Christopher J. Clark of Clark Smith Villazor, in an interview with The Washington Post describing the lawsuit. “They feel like: We made Truth Social for you. You get 90 percent. But some people just aren’t happy with 90 percent.”

https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2024/02/29/truth-social-lawsuit-trump-media-founders/

Anonymous wrote:Truth Social is about to go public any moment now, right? Will Trump be able to use that as a piggy bank?

Anonymous wrote:I may actually vote for Trump solely because of what NY is doing to him. Which is outrageous. It's nothing more than destroying the integrity of America's legal systems to punish him out of vengeance. I thought this kind of crap only happened in Russia or Turkey.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Trump is 77 years old. I am sure he did not turn fraud in last two years. But why are so many cases against him only in the last couple of years? Clearly the opposition is trying to get him. There is a collusion among people in power to eliminate Trump even by unethical means. Half the country loves him regardless of his character. And we should allow the people to decide whom they want. Flooding the country with illegals, changing the demography to favor a party and using any means to bring down a political opponent is much worse than what Trump has ever done!

None of those "illegals" are able to vote, no matter how much you claim they will.

And you are basically saying that criminals should not be held accountable for their crimes as long as they are popular.

That is what many refer to as a two-tiered justice system and is not how a country founded on the rule of law is supposed to operate.

And Trump's crimes didn't start in the last two years.

He was has been found guilty of housing discrimination, of laundering money, of committing fraud on behalf of Trump U, Trump foundation and now Trump Org.

Do you not know this?

Looks like my message has been deleted. Not sure why.
I am not saying criminals should not be accountable. I am saying opposition is after Trump last couple of years. If he was a fraud, the court cases should have been happening well before that. It clearly shows that it’s politically motivated. If he was a criminal he should have paid for his crimes 10 years ago, 15 years ago. That did not happen.

There are 2 things:
1) Deep state does not like him
2) Half the country love him in spite of everything and want him back

So if the people want him as President, then deep state has to get him out by other means

No absolutely false.

Trump has been civilly charged.
Trump University, Trump Foundation, Trump illegal teen modeling (outrage conservatives) not charge he shut it down right before, Trump water, many many times with judgments against him. He stole from St Judes got a huge fine and was never to open a charity again. And yes SDNY gave him many passes every time he donated to the Prosecutor's political funds, ask Cy Vance.

This particular judgment today has forensic accountants, so you think those people lied under oath? Do you think Judge Ergeon just picked a number out of a hat? Learn to read. The facts are on the internet, the case is in-depth on the internet. It's a Ponzi scheme that always has been. He lied over and over again. He overvalued his properties. FACT.

Let's look at Trump's criminal past.
Regarding the various irregularities in the Trump Foundation, former head of the Internal Revenue Service's Office of Exempt Organizations Division Marc Owens told The Washington Post that he was surprised by the "laundry list of issues".

The office of New York State Attorney General Eric Schneiderman investigated the foundation "to make sure it's complying with the laws governing charities in New York." The Trump Foundation was found to have committed fraud and misappropriated funds and was ordered to be shut down.

Trump University
The settlement allots $21 million in funds to the students who were defrauded by Trump University. Yeah, he did nothing wrong.

I could keep going but you are too stupid to read cognitively given you support a criminal.

You could go on but fact of the matter is it’s not a good look for the system to run against one person at exactly when he is trying to re-run for President. My question again if he is a criminal for last 50 years, why now he has been charged? We did not see this in 2016. Open your eyes, by hook or crook they want this man out. And I am against this. I am not a Trump supporter but aghast at how the greatest democracy in the world wants a candidate out because he is not a good look for the country. And thereby making themselves not look good for the rest of the world.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Trump is 77 years old. I am sure he did not turn fraud in last two years. But why are so many cases against him only in the last couple of years? Clearly the opposition is trying to get him. There is a collusion among people in power to eliminate Trump even by unethical means. Half the country loves him regardless of his character. And we should allow the people to decide whom they want. Flooding the country with illegals, changing the demography to favor a party and using any means to bring down a political opponent is much worse than what Trump has ever done!

None of those "illegals" are able to vote, no matter how much you claim they will.

And you are basically saying that criminals should not be held accountable for their crimes as long as they are popular.

That is what many refer to as a two-tiered justice system and is not how a country founded on the rule of law is supposed to operate.

And Trump's crimes didn't start in the last two years.

He was has been found guilty of housing discrimination, of laundering money, of committing fraud on behalf of Trump U, Trump foundation and now Trump Org.

Do you not know this?

Looks like my message has been deleted. Not sure why.
I am not saying criminals should not be accountable. I am saying opposition is after Trump last couple of years. If he was a fraud, the court cases should have been happening well before that. It clearly shows that it’s politically motivated. If he was a criminal he should have paid for his crimes 10 years ago, 15 years ago. That did not happen.

There are 2 things:
1) Deep state does not like him
2) Half the country love him in spite of everything and want him back

So if the people want him as President, then deep state has to get him out by other means

No absolutely false.

Trump has been civilly charged.
Trump University, Trump Foundation, Trump illegal teen modeling (outrage conservatives) not charge he shut it down right before, Trump water, many many times with judgments against him. He stole from St Judes got a huge fine and was never to open a charity again. And yes SDNY gave him many passes every time he donated to the Prosecutor's political funds, ask Cy Vance.

This particular judgment today has forensic accountants, so you think those people lied under oath? Do you think Judge Ergeon just picked a number out of a hat? Learn to read. The facts are on the internet, the case is in-depth on the internet. It's a Ponzi scheme that always has been. He lied over and over again. He overvalued his properties. FACT.

Let's look at Trump's criminal past.
Regarding the various irregularities in the Trump Foundation, former head of the Internal Revenue Service's Office of Exempt Organizations Division Marc Owens told The Washington Post that he was surprised by the "laundry list of issues".

The office of New York State Attorney General Eric Schneiderman investigated the foundation "to make sure it's complying with the laws governing charities in New York." The Trump Foundation was found to have committed fraud and misappropriated funds and was ordered to be shut down.

Trump University
The settlement allots $21 million in funds to the students who were defrauded by Trump University. Yeah, he did nothing wrong.

I could keep going but you are too stupid to read cognitively given you support a criminal.

You could go on but fact of the matter is it’s not a good look for the system to run against one person at exactly when he is trying to re-run for President. My question again if he is a criminal for last 50 years, why now he has been charged? We did not see this in 2016. Open your eyes, by hook or crook they want this man out. And I am against this. I am not a Trump supporter but aghast at how the greatest democracy in the world wants a candidate out because he is not a good look for the country. And thereby making themselves not look good for the rest of the world.

Trump is a citizen of the US he broke our laws.

He’s not King.

He is not immune from prosecution.

Grand juries of his peers across this country have indicted him. You think those people didn’t take their oaths seriously?

No you are a maga brain dead trumper.

If you think optics come before the laws of the United Stares of America maybe you should move to Russia worked out well for the maga that did that…

Downright silly that anyone who says the innumerable court cases against Trump are wrong is either Russian or MAGA or White. I am none of these. Can you remove the party labels you wear and just see how the system is being weaponized against one man? I don't know Trump's record of all the wrongdoings he has done but I am also not a fan of his actions and words. Right now what I don't agree is that the entire system is out to get rid of one person. Court cases left right and center, several states trying to get him out of the ballot, all of msm censoring him - this is nothing but the system ganging up on him. This is not Democracy.