Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Trump 9-0.

Sorry.

6-3

9-0, and stay in immunity case denied 9-0

If The three liberals sell their vote for this then they will sell their vote for immunity. Despicable, corrupt and every damn one of them should rot in Hell listening to a neverending campaign rally from Trump.

... not sure you understand how negotiating works, friend.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Trump 9-0.

Sorry.

6-3

9-0, and stay in immunity case denied 9-0

If The three liberals sell their vote for this then they will sell their vote for immunity. Despicable, corrupt and every damn one of them should rot in Hell listening to a neverending campaign rally from Trump.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It was over when Justice Kagan said, “why does Colorado get to decide.”

It was downhill from there.

And it was a stupid question from her. I can’t believe how stupid. Colorado doesn’t get to decide. It just gets to present the question. There is no clear case law precedent to follow so everyone understood that the US Supreme Court would be the one to decide how to interpret the 14th Amendment but SCOTUS couldn’t do that without a case originating somewhere.

The answer should have been Colorado is deciding for Colorado. Arizona is free to make their own decision.

The Constitution applies to every state. The ballot question is for each state to handle according to their rules. The disqualification question is a federal issue, a constitutional question.

Which is why it is in the Supreme Court. Every SCOTUS interpretation of the Constitution starts with a decision somewhere else that gets appealed to them. There is nothing out of order for Colorado to interpret the constitution when presented with a question under its jurisdiction for which there is no SCOTUS precedent. SCOTUS’s purpose is to interpret the Constitution, not to avoid the question by saying it is none of Colorado’s business whether a candidate is eligible for office.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It was over when Justice Kagan said, “why does Colorado get to decide.”

It was downhill from there.

And it was a stupid question from her. I can’t believe how stupid. Colorado doesn’t get to decide. It just gets to present the question. There is no clear case law precedent to follow so everyone understood that the US Supreme Court would be the one to decide how to interpret the 14th Amendment but SCOTUS couldn’t do that without a case originating somewhere.

The answer should have been Colorado is deciding for Colorado. Arizona is free to make their own decision.

The Constitution applies to every state. The ballot question is for each state to handle according to their rules. The disqualification question is a federal issue, a constitutional question.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It wasn’t an insurrection. It was a protest that started off peaceful and then turned into a riot.

+1

The SC will rule on truth and law; hence, this will end badly for the Democrats.

I was working for Congress that day and you are both big fat liar who are dumb AF.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It was over when Justice Kagan said, “why does Colorado get to decide.”

It was downhill from there.

And it was a stupid question from her. I can’t believe how stupid. Colorado doesn’t get to decide. It just gets to present the question. There is no clear case law precedent to follow so everyone understood that the US Supreme Court would be the one to decide how to interpret the 14th Amendment but SCOTUS couldn’t do that without a case originating somewhere.

The answer should have been Colorado is deciding for Colorado. Arizona is free to make their own decision.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It wasn’t an insurrection. It was a protest that started off peaceful and then turned into a riot.

+1

The SC will rule on truth and law; hence, this will end badly for the Democrats.

The pics and video and live accounts don't lie. No matter how much traitorous, lying pigs like the two PPs do.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Trump 9-0.

Sorry.

6-3

9-0, and stay in immunity case denied 9-0

Anonymous wrote:Trump 9-0.

Sorry.

6-3

Anonymous wrote:Of course it was a resurrection. Even people who are pro-Trump can see that and not care because he's their pick. What I don't get is saying things like, the voters should have a right to decide. Even on the supreme court people are that simplistic? No, the people don't have a right to decide. The constitution says they don't.

Don't pretend you care about America if you don't even respect our constitution.

LOL freudian slip! Insurrection, obviously.

Of course it was a resurrection. Even people who are pro-Trump can see that and not care because he's their pick. What I don't get is saying things like, the voters should have a right to decide. Even on the supreme court people are that simplistic? No, the people don't have a right to decide. The constitution says they don't.

Don't pretend you care about America if you don't even respect our constitution.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Trump 9-0.

Sorry.

Might as well just crack open that case in the National Archives and set the Constitution on fire, since the words CLEARLY written on it apparently now mean absolutely nothing to SCOTUS.

It’s actually quite the opposite but nice try.

Oh, you live in opposite land? The rest of us don't, we live in normal land where words have meanings. Or at least they used to.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Trump 9-0.

Sorry.

Might as well just crack open that case in the National Archives and set the Constitution on fire, since the words CLEARLY written on it apparently now mean absolutely nothing to SCOTUS.

It’s actually quite the opposite but nice try.

Anonymous wrote:It wasn’t an insurrection. It was a protest that started off peaceful and then turned into a riot.

+1

The SC will rule on truth and law; hence, this will end badly for the Democrats.

Anonymous wrote:How likely is it that 6 justices will agree that Trump has complete immunity? Sadly, 100%, Roberts. Alito. Thomas. Gorsuch, Barrett, and Kavanaugh just turned us into a monarchy with Trump given the divine right of kings. God help us.

If they give him this win for the CO case (1 of only 2 states that did this anyway) he will say he is vindicated and the SC is great. Then for the immunity case they can deny cert of maybe even go against him on the merits and then it will be harder for him to say the SC is biased against him.