Anonymous wrote:
…the UC system admits the top 9% of each school.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Again, switch his skin color to black and see what would happen.
Again, UC is race blind.
This is a joke. Race can be proxied in many different ways like in the recent TJ reform. You think people are that stupid?
You are really a non-nuanced and reactive thinker. Yes, race can be proxied but the UC system admits the top 9% of each school. The kid attended a wealthy, high-performing suburban school. Kids at his school don't benefit from racial proxies. The UCs didn't pass over applicants in his school for another school with lower-performing students. They passed over him and admitted the higher performing kids (based on GPA and rigor), which are predominantly Aisan. That is the system that CA adopted. Texas has the same system but admits more OOS students, especially UT Austin, and doesn't have an exploding college-age population compared to Texas.
I mean they can tell you're an Asian from your last name. It's not that hard.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Again, switch his skin color to black and see what would happen.
Again, UC is race blind.
This is a joke. Race can be proxied in many different ways like in the recent TJ reform. You think people are that stupid?
You are really a non-nuanced and reactive thinker. Yes, race can be proxied but the UC system admits the top 9% of each school. The kid attended a wealthy, high-performing suburban school. Kids at his school don't benefit from racial proxies. The UCs didn't pass over applicants in his school for another school with lower-performing students. They passed over him and admitted the higher performing kids (based on GPA and rigor), which are predominantly Aisan. That is the system that CA adopted. Texas has the same system but admits more OOS students, especially UT Austin, and doesn't have an exploding college-age population compared to Texas.
I mean they can tell you're an Asian from your last name. It's not that hard.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Again, switch his skin color to black and see what would happen.
Again, UC is race blind.
This is a joke. Race can be proxied in many different ways like in the recent TJ reform. You think people are that stupid?
You are really a non-nuanced and reactive thinker. Yes, race can be proxied but the UC system admits the top 9% of each school. The kid attended a wealthy, high-performing suburban school. Kids at his school don't benefit from racial proxies. The UCs didn't pass over applicants in his school for another school with lower-performing students. They passed over him and admitted the higher performing kids (based on GPA and rigor), which are predominantly Aisan. That is the system that CA adopted. Texas has the same system but admits more OOS students, especially UT Austin, and doesn't have an exploding college-age population compared to Texas.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Again, switch his skin color to black and see what would happen.
Again, UC is race blind.
This is a joke. Race can be proxied in many different ways like in the recent TJ reform. You think people are that stupid?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Not sure about his start-up but he and his team came in second for the google competition, which is a world wide event. Obviously, google thinks he is good, which makes me think that he actually contributed to the start-up or at least his CS skills are great.
Bottom line, this kid gets hired by google but not admitted to top programs or one UC school that he applied to. That should raise some red flags because it doesn't make sense. And when things don't make sense, it is reasonable to start asking what went wrong or why.
Lots of people quick to assume this kids father created the website, his parents pushed him, he wrote lousy essays, his teacher recommendations were bad. I doubt any of that is true because this kid got hired by google. He has to have been interviewed and vetted by one of the top US companies. I am surprised that people are so quick to criticize a high schooler instead of criticizing the college admission system.
No surprise. People are quick to jump out to justify the potential racial discrimination. They always try to make false accusations when Asians are the victims.
I agree with the OP, but for the majority of the schools the kid applied to it wasn’t racial discrimination. It’s competitive college admissions that has gotten worse in the last few years. The UCs CalPoly and Caltech didn’t even get to see his SAT score or count all of his AP classes in their GPA calculations. He wasn’t at the top of his HS class. I don’t think UWashington looks at SAT scores either. Stanford— probably an Asian penalty. MIT and Caltech, no. Don’t conveniently ignore all of his Asian classmates that were in the top 9% and did get into a UC.
Even though MIT is 25-30% Asian it does have a penalty. Most of my Asian friends knew this to be fact. The penalty is more that it is a hyper competitive pool and MIT has a bad history with Asian students committing suicide that, I believe, they've tried to control by rejecting students that have awards but little to no social skills.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Not sure about his start-up but he and his team came in second for the google competition, which is a world wide event. Obviously, google thinks he is good, which makes me think that he actually contributed to the start-up or at least his CS skills are great.
Bottom line, this kid gets hired by google but not admitted to top programs or one UC school that he applied to. That should raise some red flags because it doesn't make sense. And when things don't make sense, it is reasonable to start asking what went wrong or why.
Lots of people quick to assume this kids father created the website, his parents pushed him, he wrote lousy essays, his teacher recommendations were bad. I doubt any of that is true because this kid got hired by google. He has to have been interviewed and vetted by one of the top US companies. I am surprised that people are so quick to criticize a high schooler instead of criticizing the college admission system.
No surprise. People are quick to jump out to justify the potential racial discrimination. They always try to make false accusations when Asians are the victims.
I agree with the OP, but for the majority of the schools the kid applied to it wasn’t racial discrimination. It’s competitive college admissions that has gotten worse in the last few years. The UCs CalPoly and Caltech didn’t even get to see his SAT score or count all of his AP classes in their GPA calculations. He wasn’t at the top of his HS class. I don’t think UWashington looks at SAT scores either. Stanford— probably an Asian penalty. MIT and Caltech, no. Don’t conveniently ignore all of his Asian classmates that were in the top 9% and did get into a UC.
Anonymous wrote:My guess is he interviewed poorly or wrote terrible essays.
I've met some very odd people with a similar pedigree and even MIT tries to sort out people that may be high risk for suicide (not saying he is, but there are things they look for that have nothing to do with awards or test scores).
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Again, switch his skin color to black and see what would happen.
Again, UC is race blind.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Again, switch his skin color to black and see what would happen.
Again, UC is race blind.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:As Elon Musk twitted, "The left hates Asians".
It's very true.
Whos is that guy, the apartheid emerald mine owner?
A more trustworthy guy than a random and maliciously biased DCUM poster
Nah, Non-random maliciously biased person with a decade long track record of being trashy in his professional, personal, and civic life is not more trustworthy than someone who stated a simple non-dusputed fact.
Anonymous wrote:Again, switch his skin color to black and see what would happen.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:As Elon Musk twitted, "The left hates Asians".
It's very true.
Whos is that guy, the apartheid emerald mine owner?
A more trustworthy guy than a random and maliciously biased DCUM poster