Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It is the same excess of wealth, hubris, and reliance on flawed, yet cutting edge technology that led to the sinking of the Titanic. The parallels give me chills. What an unnecessary nightmare. I hope for a good outcome.
Although well-intentioned, this kind of tourism should stop. The parallels drawn in other posts to Gettysburg, etc., aren't the same because those are far more accessible- no great wealth required.
Why should it stop? These people spent their own money and went in voluntarily having assessed the risks and resolved them to their satisfaction. Presumably, with the kind of money the spent on a frolic, they were pretty sophisticated.
If it turns out they guessed wrong, that’s on them. People have a right to decide things for themselves.
Keep up the extreme tourism if people want, but no public funds should be spent on rescue missions.
We have children and adults in this country that do not have enough food to eat, yet we instead divert funds to the Coast Guard to spend money on rescuing these idiots.
So I will ask again, I take it you don’t think the USCG should rescue crab fisherman either! Nice name calling by the way. I guess those who consume king crab are also idiots.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It is the same excess of wealth, hubris, and reliance on flawed, yet cutting edge technology that led to the sinking of the Titanic. The parallels give me chills. What an unnecessary nightmare. I hope for a good outcome.
Although well-intentioned, this kind of tourism should stop. The parallels drawn in other posts to Gettysburg, etc., aren't the same because those are far more accessible- no great wealth required.
Why should it stop? These people spent their own money and went in voluntarily having assessed the risks and resolved them to their satisfaction. Presumably, with the kind of money the spent on a frolic, they were pretty sophisticated.
If it turns out they guessed wrong, that’s on them. People have a right to decide things for themselves.
Keep up the extreme tourism if people want, but no public funds should be spent on rescue missions.
We have children and adults in this country that do not have enough food to eat, yet we instead divert funds to the Coast Guard to spend money on rescuing these idiots.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It is the same excess of wealth, hubris, and reliance on flawed, yet cutting edge technology that led to the sinking of the Titanic. The parallels give me chills. What an unnecessary nightmare. I hope for a good outcome.
Although well-intentioned, this kind of tourism should stop. The parallels drawn in other posts to Gettysburg, etc., aren't the same because those are far more accessible- no great wealth required.
Why should it stop? These people spent their own money and went in voluntarily having assessed the risks and resolved them to their satisfaction. Presumably, with the kind of money the spent on a frolic, they were pretty sophisticated.
If it turns out they guessed wrong, that’s on them. People have a right to decide things for themselves.
Great, but what about the people who are rescuing them? and the taxpayers paying that bill? It's not all about the people who went.
Anonymous wrote:The fact that they can’t communicate and haven’t surfaced points to a hull breach.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I feel so sorry for the teenager on board. While technically an adult, he certainly didn’t pay for it himself. Surely the father knew the risks and made what he thought was an informed decision- fine- but why bring a teen along? So sad.
The boy isn’t 4. He must have asked to go.
19 year olds are notoriously great at risk assessment and their deep understanding of their own mortality.
Yeah look at the HS kid who jumped off a ship on his graduation trip in the Bahamas while drunk. Boys around this age seem to have little concept of risk/death. And he probably trusted his father knew it was safe.
While I agree that a younger person likely has a different perception of mortality and risk aversity, there is no reason to believe the teenager thought this was a safe endeavor. The liability waiver each crew member is required to sign very clearly states that it is an experimental craft not approved by any regulatory agency and death is a very possible outcome of the mission.
Yeah but you sign those waivers practically everywhere these days. Who really pays attention to the death is a possibility part?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I hope my death is never discussed on this site, because NO MATTER WHAT THE CAUSE, internet posters finds a way to blame the victims.
that may be -- but this is sort of an extreme situation where people literally risked their lives intentionally.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Is the Pakistani Navy steaming to the rescue?
Is that supposed to be a joke? Making fun of countries that have less resources that the US?
If so, it is distasteful and xenophobic.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Hopefully these extensive rescue efforts will help locate survivors not just from the tourist sub, but the original Titanic disaster. You never know how many people are still waiting to be rescued from then. Bless them all.
Do you honestly believe intact bodies/skeletons remain from the Titanic? Over 100 years ago, 2 miles under the North Atlantic? Honestly?
The water is too acidic at that level. The bones would have dissolved long ago
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Is the Pakistani Navy steaming to the rescue?
Is that supposed to be a joke? Making fun of countries that have less resources that the US?
If so, it is distasteful and xenophobic.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Hopefully these extensive rescue efforts will help locate survivors not just from the tourist sub, but the original Titanic disaster. You never know how many people are still waiting to be rescued from then. Bless them all.
Do you honestly believe intact bodies/skeletons remain from the Titanic? Over 100 years ago, 2 miles under the North Atlantic? Honestly?