Anonymous wrote:Obama froze federal salaries for three years. The feds deserve this raise.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Because SEC is the only part of government that actually does any meaningful work.
Yes, all those agents, prosecutors, intelligence and cybersecurity professionals, meatpacking inspectors, etc. don't do anything meaningful.![]()
You have to keep in mind that even though the SEC pays much better than other government agencies, it is still much lower than what people who work at the SEC will make in the private sector or even some non-profits. I work at the nonprofit and we work very closely with the SEC and we get paid higher there than folks at the SEC. I make 300K at the nonprofit; however, my salary would be 220K at the SEC. I also get a pension, 7% 401K matching and better health/dental benefits at the non-profit than I would have at the SEC. You can't compare Finregs with other government agencies because they are not the same.[/quot
are you FINRA or what type of nonprofit ?
Anonymous wrote:Please, give the non-trial SEC lawyers nobody heard of earning over 200k a much needed 5.2% raise.
Anonymous wrote:Please, give the non-trial SEC lawyers nobody heard of earning over 200k a much needed 5.2% raise.
Anonymous wrote:I don’t see how they hold domestic spending flat while giving employees a five percent pay raise. Looks like it’s back to the Obama years.
Anonymous wrote:It’s impossible to justify the higher salaries for SEC attorneys (and Fed., CFTC, etc.). I would actually consider spending the next 30 years of my career at SEC pay but not GS15-10 pay. Instead I’ll go back to biglaw/in-house after five years and cash in on the revolving door in my field.
That said, I get that raising salaries for people making $183.5k is politically indefensible.
Anonymous wrote:It’s impossible to justify the higher salaries for SEC attorneys (and Fed., CFTC, etc.). I would actually consider spending the next 30 years of my career at SEC pay but not GS15-10 pay. Instead I’ll go back to biglaw/in-house after five years and cash in on the revolving door in my field.
That said, I get that raising salaries for people making $183.5k is politically indefensible.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Because SEC is the only part of government that actually does any meaningful work.
Yes, all those agents, prosecutors, intelligence and cybersecurity professionals, meatpacking inspectors, etc. don't do anything meaningful.![]()
You have to keep in mind that even though the SEC pays much better than other government agencies, it is still much lower than what people who work at the SEC will make in the private sector or even some non-profits. I work at the nonprofit and we work very closely with the SEC and we get paid higher there than folks at the SEC. I make 300K at the nonprofit; however, my salary would be 220K at the SEC. I also get a pension, 7% 401K matching and better health/dental benefits at the non-profit than I would have at the SEC. You can't compare Finregs with other government agencies because they are not the same.
The fact that the DoJ attorneys trying cases make less than the SEC attorneys passing them off if all you need to know. Finregs employers are overpaid