Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Metro 13 T lost the first match but at regionals demolished Paramount 13s. Metro 13 T lost to VA Jrs only once. But if they would have circled back Metro 13T would have won. People's facts are all wrong on this forum. But this is entertaining.
Right, grasping at any straws to put them on the same level as Metro. That said, I hear that 18s will be interesting this year - Paramount made significant upgrades and Metro just added some bench players. It was close without the upgrades last year.
Anonymous wrote:Metro 13 T lost the first match but at regionals demolished Paramount 13s. Metro h13 T lost to VA Jrs only once. But if they would have circled back Metro 13T would have won. People's facts are all wrong on this forum. But this is entertaining.
Anonymous wrote:Metro 13 T lost the first match but at regionals demolished Paramount 13s. Metro 13 T lost to VA Jrs only once. But if they would have circled back Metro 13T would have won. People's facts are all wrong on this forum. But this is entertaining.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How are the Metro 14 and 15 teams looking this season? Heard they added some additional talents. Our teams beat them last season, so just want to know what’s the expectation this season.
Depends on what you're thinking about, whether it's the travel or regional teams. (And who "our teams" represent). Plus, when I think about this for different teams, I take a look at last year's rankings for the 13 and 14 teams, and consider if the players stayed in the same club or have moved around. I suppose if someone had the time and began looking at players and player combinations, look at stats, and track them over time, it should be a fascinating look.
Anonymous wrote:How are the Metro 14 and 15 teams looking this season? Heard they added some additional talents. Our teams beat them last season, so just want to know what’s the expectation this season.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Interesting that Metro is NOT on this list….. why is that? Not very useful IMO at all but it could be once clubs on this list get more than 2 or 3 reviews per club.
Metro isn't on the list because the site specifically targets clubs that are based in Northern VA. Metro is based in Washington, DC.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Sounds toxic. My daughter is perfectly content playing for Tier 3 and 4 teams. She just loves volleyball and wants to play in the winter. All this stuff going on at the top sounds like more grief than it’s worth.
I agree but it’s also going on at lower tier clubs too I’m sad to say.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Interesting that Metro is NOT on this list….. why is that? Not very useful IMO at all but it could be once clubs on this list get more than 2 or 3 reviews per club.
Metro isn't on the list because the site specifically targets clubs that are based in Northern VA. Metro is based in Washington, DC.
Anonymous wrote:
Interesting that Metro is NOT on this list….. why is that? Not very useful IMO at all but it could be once clubs on this list get more than 2 or 3 reviews per club.
Anonymous wrote:Sounds toxic. My daughter is perfectly content playing for Tier 3 and 4 teams. She just loves volleyball and wants to play in the winter. All this stuff going on at the top sounds like more grief than it’s worth.