Anonymous wrote:
Yes, good on those kids. But it’s beyond bizarre that some of you assume you know who they’re voting for. Why do Democrats always assume everyone else is a Democrat? Will their “voices be heard” - and respected - if they vote for Republicans?![]()
Anonymous wrote:My DH canvasses for the Democrats in Michigan and has come across more than one Republican woman who says she is voting for Whitmer because Tudor is " insane. "
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Yes, good on those kids. But it’s beyond bizarre that some of you assume you know who they’re voting for. Why do Democrats always assume everyone else is a Democrat? Will their “voices be heard” - and respected - if they vote for Republicans?![]()
When turnout is up, it usually benefits democrats. Why do republicans try so hard to suppress the vote? Why do they gerrymander? Because left to a popular vote, they’d lose time and again.
Anonymous wrote:
Yes, good on those kids. But it’s beyond bizarre that some of you assume you know who they’re voting for. Why do Democrats always assume everyone else is a Democrat? Will their “voices be heard” - and respected - if they vote for Republicans?![]()
Anonymous wrote:My DH canvasses for the Democrats in Michigan and has come across more than one Republican woman who says she is voting for Whitmer because Tudor is " insane. "
Anonymous wrote:
I think this part comes just after the bit highlighted in the tweet:
“On the ballot in Kansas was an amendment to the state Constitution that would remove language enshrining abortion rights, and the vote was a resounding “no” that crossed party and gender lines. But when Bonier took a closer look at the registration data, a more specific story emerged: He found that 70% of Kansans who registered to vote after the Dobbs decision were women with a median age of 23. And in September, after further analysis, he found the data was predictive of turnout. “In the August vote on abortion rights in Kansas, women under the age of 25 turned out at a higher rate than all men (45% to 43%),” he said.
It was entirely possible that Kansas was a fluke, with the immediate momentum of Dobbs behind it. But after analyzing the registration data from across the country since then, he found the trend held.”
We’ll see if the trend does hold but as a few people have said: I’d rather be a Democrat in this cycle than a Republican.
Anonymous wrote:There are no more real undecided, just people who like to pretend they are. Even pollsters have learned to account for that. People voting or not voting is what swings elections not people changing their minds
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:These are the same women who lived under trump for 4 years and did not feel the need to vote. Now they are going to vote against conservatives?
Apparently yes.
So they were content with everything else trump and conservatives did just upset about abortion? Does not seem like these people will be very reliable.
There's a difference between content and motivated to go out and vote. They've been fed a line for years about how Republicans and Democrats are both equally terrible and somehow bought it mostly out of lazinesss.
Now they see the reality because of Roe V Wade. I suspect "these people" (condescending bulls---) may in fact be motivated and have gained a bit of clarity.
Call me cynical. If they are okay with Trump they are okay with RvW being overturned.
That is not the case with the R women I know. They are shocked that Roe was overturned.
I would love to listen in on a focus group of R women sometime. When Ds heard Kav and ACB during their confirmation hearings, we KNEW they were there to overturn Roe and it's exactly what they would do. I would love to hear from R women about what they actually heard and believed there. I find it astonishing that anyone could have come away thinking that Roe was safe with these two on the bench!