Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Most cops never fire their gun in their careers against a criminal. The focus on the SRO having a gun is a distraction issue. Properly trained SROs are very valuable in schools. That is why most want them back. The purpose is to deter crime and violence.
Yes SROs are necessary and they don’t need to be cops with guns.
Not sure that's true especially when they run away when their needed most like the one from Parkland.
Cops run away in parkland and Texas.
But regular people ran in.
So yes we need SROs but they should NOT be cops.
This is dumb. It's like saying "some people abuse welfare programs so we should get rid of it", or "more gun laws won't prevent criminals from committing crime so we shouldn't have more gun laws".
No system, program, law is perfect, but we don't get rid of it because of a few bad apples.
Actually the statistics are not in your favor. Most SROs do not stop crime. So conversely, just because 1 SRO in 50,000 did 1 good thing doesn’t mean we should have SROs.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Most cops never fire their gun in their careers against a criminal. The focus on the SRO having a gun is a distraction issue. Properly trained SROs are very valuable in schools. That is why most want them back. The purpose is to deter crime and violence.
Yes SROs are necessary and they don’t need to be cops with guns.
Not sure that's true especially when they run away when their needed most like the one from Parkland.
Cops run away in parkland and Texas.
But regular people ran in.
So yes we need SROs but they should NOT be cops.
This is dumb. It's like saying "some people abuse welfare programs so we should get rid of it", or "more gun laws won't prevent criminals from committing crime so we shouldn't have more gun laws".
No system, program, law is perfect, but we don't get rid of it because of a few bad apples.
Actually the statistics are not in your favor. Most SROs do not stop crime. So conversely, just because 1 SRO in 50,000 did 1 good thing doesn’t mean we should have SROs.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Most cops never fire their gun in their careers against a criminal. The focus on the SRO having a gun is a distraction issue. Properly trained SROs are very valuable in schools. That is why most want them back. The purpose is to deter crime and violence.
Yes SROs are necessary and they don’t need to be cops with guns.
Not sure that's true especially when they run away when their needed most like the one from Parkland.
Cops run away in parkland and Texas.
But regular people ran in.
So yes we need SROs but they should NOT be cops.
This is dumb. It's like saying "some people abuse welfare programs so we should get rid of it", or "more gun laws won't prevent criminals from committing crime so we shouldn't have more gun laws".
No system, program, law is perfect, but we don't get rid of it because of a few bad apples.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Most cops never fire their gun in their careers against a criminal. The focus on the SRO having a gun is a distraction issue. Properly trained SROs are very valuable in schools. That is why most want them back. The purpose is to deter crime and violence.
Yes SROs are necessary and they don’t need to be cops with guns.
Not sure that's true especially when they run away when their needed most like the one from Parkland.
Cops run away in parkland and Texas.
But regular people ran in.
So yes we need SROs but they should NOT be cops.
This is dumb. It's like saying "some people abuse welfare programs so we should get rid of it", or "more gun laws won't prevent criminals from committing crime so we shouldn't have more gun laws".
No system, program, law is perfect, but we don't get rid of it because of a few bad apples.
People who do not follow welfare rules can be prosecuted. People who break gun laws can be prosecuted. Police that violate the rules get a pension. Increase police accountability and you'll see more support for police.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Most cops never fire their gun in their careers against a criminal. The focus on the SRO having a gun is a distraction issue. Properly trained SROs are very valuable in schools. That is why most want them back. The purpose is to deter crime and violence.
Yes SROs are necessary and they don’t need to be cops with guns.
Not sure that's true especially when they run away when their needed most like the one from Parkland.
Cops run away in parkland and Texas.
But regular people ran in.
So yes we need SROs but they should NOT be cops.
This is dumb. It's like saying "some people abuse welfare programs so we should get rid of it", or "more gun laws won't prevent criminals from committing crime so we shouldn't have more gun laws".
No system, program, law is perfect, but we don't get rid of it because of a few bad apples.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Most cops never fire their gun in their careers against a criminal. The focus on the SRO having a gun is a distraction issue. Properly trained SROs are very valuable in schools. That is why most want them back. The purpose is to deter crime and violence.
Yes SROs are necessary and they don’t need to be cops with guns.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Most cops never fire their gun in their careers against a criminal. The focus on the SRO having a gun is a distraction issue. Properly trained SROs are very valuable in schools. That is why most want them back. The purpose is to deter crime and violence.
Yes SROs are necessary and they don’t need to be cops with guns.
Not sure that's true especially when they run away when their needed most like the one from Parkland.
Cops run away in parkland and Texas.
But regular people ran in.
So yes we need SROs but they should NOT be cops.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Most cops never fire their gun in their careers against a criminal. The focus on the SRO having a gun is a distraction issue. Properly trained SROs are very valuable in schools. That is why most want them back. The purpose is to deter crime and violence.
Were the officers involved in the murder of George Floyd properly trained? This seems like a bad idea.
There are 800,000 police officers in the United States. Are we going to hold 799,996 of them responsible for the actions of the men there that day? If we are going to do that, then we must vilify all doctors for the very few who have killed patients through neglect, all teachers for the very few who sexually assault students, etc. I will not disparage an entire group of people for the actions of very few, nor (I’m sure) will the majority of people on this thread.
I suspect you’re a troll looking to ruffle feathers. In that case, I know I just wasted my time.
So only 4 people were bad cops that day? Are you sure?
The teacher in this thread even admitted her h (a ver admirable man) sees bad cops do bad things and has never once turned them in.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Most cops never fire their gun in their careers against a criminal. The focus on the SRO having a gun is a distraction issue. Properly trained SROs are very valuable in schools. That is why most want them back. The purpose is to deter crime and violence.
Were the officers involved in the murder of George Floyd properly trained? This seems like a bad idea.
There are 800,000 police officers in the United States. Are we going to hold 799,996 of them responsible for the actions of the men there that day? If we are going to do that, then we must vilify all doctors for the very few who have killed patients through neglect, all teachers for the very few who sexually assault students, etc. I will not disparage an entire group of people for the actions of very few, nor (I’m sure) will the majority of people on this thread.
I suspect you’re a troll looking to ruffle feathers. In that case, I know I just wasted my time.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Most cops never fire their gun in their careers against a criminal. The focus on the SRO having a gun is a distraction issue. Properly trained SROs are very valuable in schools. That is why most want them back. The purpose is to deter crime and violence.
Yes SROs are necessary and they don’t need to be cops with guns.
Not sure that's true especially when they run away when their needed most like the one from Parkland.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Most cops never fire their gun in their careers against a criminal. The focus on the SRO having a gun is a distraction issue. Properly trained SROs are very valuable in schools. That is why most want them back. The purpose is to deter crime and violence.
Were the officers involved in the murder of George Floyd properly trained? This seems like a bad idea.
There are 800,000 police officers in the United States. Are we going to hold 799,996 of them responsible for the actions of the men there that day? If we are going to do that, then we must vilify all doctors for the very few who have killed patients through neglect, all teachers for the very few who sexually assault students, etc. I will not disparage an entire group of people for the actions of very few, nor (I’m sure) will the majority of people on this thread.
I suspect you’re a troll looking to ruffle feathers. In that case, I know I just wasted my time.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Most cops never fire their gun in their careers against a criminal. The focus on the SRO having a gun is a distraction issue. Properly trained SROs are very valuable in schools. That is why most want them back. The purpose is to deter crime and violence.
Were the officers involved in the murder of George Floyd properly trained? This seems like a bad idea.
Anonymous wrote:Most cops never fire their gun in their careers against a criminal. The focus on the SRO having a gun is a distraction issue. Properly trained SROs are very valuable in schools. That is why most want them back. The purpose is to deter crime and violence.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Most cops never fire their gun in their careers against a criminal. The focus on the SRO having a gun is a distraction issue. Properly trained SROs are very valuable in schools. That is why most want them back. The purpose is to deter crime and violence.
Yes SROs are necessary and they don’t need to be cops with guns.
Anonymous wrote:Most cops never fire their gun in their careers against a criminal. The focus on the SRO having a gun is a distraction issue. Properly trained SROs are very valuable in schools. That is why most want them back. The purpose is to deter crime and violence.