Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:That can't be pilling - it has to be a boucle-type sweater. You can see the photo larger here
https://www.gettyimages.com/detail/news-photo/vice-president-jd-and-second-lady-usha-vance-eat-a-meal-news-photo/2206673988?adppopup=true
I looked at the larger photo and zoomed in.
It is pilling, and it looks even worse up close.
It’s really, really bad.
Anonymous wrote:How TF can she afford a $60,000 watch? She made only a little more than twice that per year as the SD Governor and makes $250K now.Anonymous wrote:Kristi wore a $60k watch to visit the prison. https://nypost.com/2025/03/27/us-news/kristi-noem-appears-to-wear-60k-rolex-at-el-salvadors-cecot-prison/
Anonymous wrote:That can't be pilling - it has to be a boucle-type sweater. You can see the photo larger here
https://www.gettyimages.com/detail/news-photo/vice-president-jd-and-second-lady-usha-vance-eat-a-meal-news-photo/2206673988?adppopup=true
Anonymous wrote:
Side parts are often more flattering, and it's sad to me that so many women give in to the middle part trend.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Side parts are often more flattering, and it's sad to me that so many women give in to the middle part trend.
I had a widow's peak when I was young and wore my hair long, straight, parted in the middle like everyone else around me until I realized that with a low forehead, eyes too close together, and a wide face it was a bad idea. Went to a side part and never looked back.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Looks at least 40 in today's Washington Post Love Story to her:
![]()
But of the MAGA loving WaPo says: "Trump’s newest press secretary is radiant, blond and apple-cheeked — as if one of Leonardo da Vinci’s Madonnas had been styled for a Fox News hit." Gag. Barf.
Also why is her face so FLAT? No, not fat, F-L-A-T?
![]()
She forgot to do the back of her hair below, LOL!
![]()
And below, she was like 24 years old and dressed AGAIN like a 55 year old. Ewwww. This was well before she had her baby, no excuses.
![]()
No woman’s butt has ever looked good in tan pants.
But - and it is shocking that I’m about to compliment KL - I give her credit for no lines or bulges under those.
Zero credit. Wrinkles and seamless dimples.
^seam dimples. Whatever those divots are where the material is not shaped to lie flat.
Anonymous wrote:
Side parts are often more flattering, and it's sad to me that so many women give in to the middle part trend.