Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If you want to see Trump go down, you have to be enraged that Willis/Wade, relatively unintelligent, lazy, inexperienced and palpably crooked prosecutors, were selected to handle this case. There are hundreds, maybe more than a thousand, highly intelligent, experienced, deadly serious and honest Democrat-oriented prosecutors and civil trial attorneys who would have done this trial for little or no pay. This entire disqualification catastrophe would never have happened -- even a relatively unintelligent, inexperienced prosecutor would know not to hire their married lover as a lawyer, let alone the lead lawyer, on this case bc of exactly this disqualification circus.

Willis was not “selected” to handle the case. She’s the DA for Fulton county. She is the only person in the world who has authority bring state criminal charges for crimes committed in Fulton county.

Willis CHOSE to bring this case. And, some wonder what role the WH had in encouraging her to bring charges considering the background of Jeff DiSantis, the Deputing DA and spokesperson for Fulton County.
There is nothing illegal about Trump urging Raffensperger to investigate the election results especially considering the shenanigans that went on the evening of the election.

Trump was caught on tape telling him to find more votes. You’re insane PP. Trump is guilty AF. The election was clean. Your guy lost. Don’t let him drag you down into thinking otherwise. You look like a total fool.

Votes or illegal votes?

Exactly. "Find more votes" = do a recount and investigate the shenanigans.

There had been three recounts already. Your guy lost.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If you want to see Trump go down, you have to be enraged that Willis/Wade, relatively unintelligent, lazy, inexperienced and palpably crooked prosecutors, were selected to handle this case. There are hundreds, maybe more than a thousand, highly intelligent, experienced, deadly serious and honest Democrat-oriented prosecutors and civil trial attorneys who would have done this trial for little or no pay. This entire disqualification catastrophe would never have happened -- even a relatively unintelligent, inexperienced prosecutor would know not to hire their married lover as a lawyer, let alone the lead lawyer, on this case bc of exactly this disqualification circus.

Willis was not “selected” to handle the case. She’s the DA for Fulton county. She is the only person in the world who has authority bring state criminal charges for crimes committed in Fulton county.

Willis CHOSE to bring this case. And, some wonder what role the WH had in encouraging her to bring charges considering the background of Jeff DiSantis, the Deputing DA and spokesperson for Fulton County.
There is nothing illegal about Trump urging Raffensperger to investigate the election results especially considering the shenanigans that went on the evening of the election.

Trump was caught on tape telling him to find more votes. You’re insane PP. Trump is guilty AF. The election was clean. Your guy lost. Don’t let him drag you down into thinking otherwise. You look like a total fool.

Votes or illegal votes?

Exactly. "Find more votes" = do a recount and investigate the shenanigans.

Anonymous wrote:I am well over 50 and in all my years I have never seen so much public discussion over exactly where a DA lives, their day to day travel routes, triangulation of their home, etc. It seems like someone is tossing chum into the water hoping to attract the crazies. It is almost like swatting.

Anonymous wrote:

Two of my oldest friends went to the courthouse and got married. They didn't tell anyone for almost 10 years! If I was called to testify I would have sworn on the Bible that they were just two divorced people having a casual thing.

That's nice.
Evidently, Wade's and Willis' fling was not the secret they wanted it to be given that one witness testified that she knew it started in at least 2021.
And, the fact that they went on cruises and luxury trips together.

Two of my oldest friends went to the courthouse and got married. They didn't tell anyone for almost 10 years! If I was called to testify I would have sworn on the Bible that they were just two divorced people having a casual thing.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why is Bradley changing his story? He looks evasive on the stand.

Because he doesn’t want to lose his law license by lying under oath. He was big mad with Wade and Willis, willing to help someone who wanted to take them down. When he ended up on the stand, he was unwilling to continue the charade. Now, he’s pissed at Merchant for calling him to testify when she couldn’t find anyone else to back up his story. She promised she wouldn’t drag him publicly into this.

Another theory.......
He knows good and well that the relationship between Wade and Willis started long before they testified. And, all the information he gave to Merchant in the texts was true and accurate.
But, he knows if he reveals the truth, he will be burning bridges and closing the door to work in Fulton County. If he maintains the charade of pretending that he has no knowledge of their relationship, he may get work thrown at him from the DA's office. [/quote

Nope. He is done. I don't think he knows when the relationship began. Men don't usually talk like that. I asked my DH and brother and they told me that grown men don't have those type of conversations. So, I turned to my 19-year-old son and poised the question to him. His response is that they don't get into details like that. They might see you with a girl and make assumptions, but to have a conversation about when they began "hitting it" is not a thing. That's girl stuff.

Two of my oldest friends went to the courthouse and got married. They didn't tell anyone for almost 10 years! If I was called to testify I would have sworn on the Bible that they were just two divorced people having a casual thing.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why is Bradley changing his story? He looks evasive on the stand.

Because he doesn’t want to lose his law license by lying under oath. He was big mad with Wade and Willis, willing to help someone who wanted to take them down. When he ended up on the stand, he was unwilling to continue the charade. Now, he’s pissed at Merchant for calling him to testify when she couldn’t find anyone else to back up his story. She promised she wouldn’t drag him publicly into this.

Another theory.......
He knows good and well that the relationship between Wade and Willis started long before they testified. And, all the information he gave to Merchant in the texts was true and accurate.
But, he knows if he reveals the truth, he will be burning bridges and closing the door to work in Fulton County. If he maintains the charade of pretending that he has no knowledge of their relationship, he may get work thrown at him from the DA's office.

I doubt it. He already got bounced out of his own law firm after the sexual assault claims. He will probably end up working for the local gangster rappers. Who else will want to deal with him now?

Why would they trust him with their legal matters. He is done. At least I hope he is.

Because who in their right mind would rat on "Young Thug" or "Gunna" or "Slime"

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why is Bradley changing his story? He looks evasive on the stand.

Because he doesn’t want to lose his law license by lying under oath. He was big mad with Wade and Willis, willing to help someone who wanted to take them down. When he ended up on the stand, he was unwilling to continue the charade. Now, he’s pissed at Merchant for calling him to testify when she couldn’t find anyone else to back up his story. She promised she wouldn’t drag him publicly into this.

Another theory.......
He knows good and well that the relationship between Wade and Willis started long before they testified. And, all the information he gave to Merchant in the texts was true and accurate.
But, he knows if he reveals the truth, he will be burning bridges and closing the door to work in Fulton County. If he maintains the charade of pretending that he has no knowledge of their relationship, he may get work thrown at him from the DA's office.

I doubt it. He already got bounced out of his own law firm after the sexual assault claims. He will probably end up working for the local gangster rappers. Who else will want to deal with him now?

Why would they trust him with their legal matters. He is done. At least I hope he is.

Because who in their right mind would rat on "Young Thug" or "Gunna" or "Slime"

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why is Bradley changing his story? He looks evasive on the stand.

Because he doesn’t want to lose his law license by lying under oath. He was big mad with Wade and Willis, willing to help someone who wanted to take them down. When he ended up on the stand, he was unwilling to continue the charade. Now, he’s pissed at Merchant for calling him to testify when she couldn’t find anyone else to back up his story. She promised she wouldn’t drag him publicly into this.

Another theory.......
He knows good and well that the relationship between Wade and Willis started long before they testified. And, all the information he gave to Merchant in the texts was true and accurate.
But, he knows if he reveals the truth, he will be burning bridges and closing the door to work in Fulton County. If he maintains the charade of pretending that he has no knowledge of their relationship, he may get work thrown at him from the DA's office. [/quote

Nope. He is done. I don't think he knows when the relationship began. Men don't usually talk like that. I asked my DH and brother and they told me that grown men don't have those type of conversations. So, I turned to my 19-year-old son and poised the question to him. His response is that they don't get into details like that. They might see you with a girl and make assumptions, but to have a conversation about when they began "hitting it" is not a thing. That's girl stuff.