Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Looks like the officers didn’t even notice his hand gun in the first encounter. He was lucky he wasn’t arrested, shot, or disarmed then. Then he follows ICE around for more? Wild.
He probably should have been arrested that day, yes. But that's not related to his being disarmed and shot days later.
No”probably” about it. He would be alive today if he had been arrested then, as he should have been. ALL of these agitators should be arrested at first offense and carted off for processing and booking.
Most of them are standing, whistling, yelling, filming. You can't legitimately arrest them for that. The only difference is on Jan. 13 he kicked a car. That's what you'd arrest him for. That said, five ICE agents shouldn't have tackled him and broken his rib in response.
They should have cuffed him and take him in the ICE facility for a couple days to chill out. He would be alive today but no he wanted what he got.
No, ICE does not have the authority to detain citizens for chill out purposes or otherwise.
Yes, this is where local Minneapolis officials are failing. What he was doing was illegal and they were responsible. They don't have to enforce federal laws like immigration if they don't want to, but all other laws they are responsible for.
You still can’t murder people over hurt feelings.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:ICE agent in a private chat with colleagues: "Ten versus one and somehow they couldn’t find a way to subdue the guy...They all carry belts and vests with 9,000 pieces of equipment on them and the best they can do is shoot a guy in the back?”
https://www.kenklippenstein.com/p/ices-secret-watchlists-of-americans
Such obvious hyperbole, why should we listen to one word he has to say? My mind closed at the ridiculous “9000 pieces”
If you want to change minds, do better
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Have we seen the bodycam from the agent who shot Pretti?
I thought it was confirmed that bodycam footage existed.
You KNOW if it was exonerating for the agent, they would have posted it already.
I agree with your assessment. We would have seen it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Looks like the officers didn’t even notice his hand gun in the first encounter. He was lucky he wasn’t arrested, shot, or disarmed then. Then he follows ICE around for more? Wild.
He probably should have been arrested that day, yes. But that's not related to his being disarmed and shot days later.
No”probably” about it. He would be alive today if he had been arrested then, as he should have been. ALL of these agitators should be arrested at first offense and carted off for processing and booking.
Most of them are standing, whistling, yelling, filming. You can't legitimately arrest them for that. The only difference is on Jan. 13 he kicked a car. That's what you'd arrest him for. That said, five ICE agents shouldn't have tackled him and broken his rib in response.
They should have cuffed him and take him in the ICE facility for a couple days to chill out. He would be alive today but no he wanted what he got.
No, ICE does not have the authority to detain citizens for chill out purposes or otherwise.
Yes, this is where local Minneapolis officials are failing. What he was doing was illegal and they were responsible. They don't have to enforce federal laws like immigration if they don't want to, but all other laws they are responsible for.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:^^^ won’t embed because the video is graphic, but shows that two Border agents who were part of the group that interacted with Alex Pretti when he was killed, confirmed by their numbers NS-919 and NS-909, are in this [earlier] video.
NS-919 was one of the main instigators of the Pretti encounter -- pushing the woman initially. Here is a clearer shot of him from allegedly days before Pretti died.
https://x.com/jsweetli/status/2016900430509265055?s=46&t=kf1qYlCXQnKgUhJWEIu2vg
It’s pretty obv they weren’t “after” him. Who gets a rib broken then goes back out again a week later and is chasing down ICE again and inserting himself in conflict? He was unhinged and obsessed.
+1.
And he kept wearing the same outfit. He wanted them to recognize him.
Anonymous wrote:ICE agent in a private chat with colleagues: "Ten versus one and somehow they couldn’t find a way to subdue the guy...They all carry belts and vests with 9,000 pieces of equipment on them and the best they can do is shoot a guy in the back?”
https://www.kenklippenstein.com/p/ices-secret-watchlists-of-americans
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:^^^ won’t embed because the video is graphic, but shows that two Border agents who were part of the group that interacted with Alex Pretti when he was killed, confirmed by their numbers NS-919 and NS-909, are in this [earlier] video.
NS-919 was one of the main instigators of the Pretti encounter -- pushing the woman initially. Here is a clearer shot of him from allegedly days before Pretti died.
https://x.com/jsweetli/status/2016900430509265055?s=46&t=kf1qYlCXQnKgUhJWEIu2vg
It’s pretty obv they weren’t “after” him. Who gets a rib broken then goes back out again a week later and is chasing down ICE again and inserting himself in conflict? He was unhinged and obsessed.
Anonymous wrote:Have we seen the bodycam from the agent who shot Pretti?
I thought it was confirmed that bodycam footage existed.
You KNOW if it was exonerating for the agent, they would have posted it already.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Looks like the officers didn’t even notice his hand gun in the first encounter. He was lucky he wasn’t arrested, shot, or disarmed then. Then he follows ICE around for more? Wild.
He probably should have been arrested that day, yes. But that's not related to his being disarmed and shot days later.
No”probably” about it. He would be alive today if he had been arrested then, as he should have been. ALL of these agitators should be arrested at first offense and carted off for processing and booking.
Most of them are standing, whistling, yelling, filming. You can't legitimately arrest them for that. The only difference is on Jan. 13 he kicked a car. That's what you'd arrest him for. That said, five ICE agents shouldn't have tackled him and broken his rib in response.
They should have cuffed him and take him in the ICE facility for a couple days to chill out. He would be alive today but no he wanted what he got.
No, ICE does not have the authority to detain citizens for chill out purposes or otherwise.
Anonymous wrote:^^^ won’t embed because the video is graphic, but shows that two Border agents who were part of the group that interacted with Alex Pretti when he was killed, confirmed by their numbers NS-919 and NS-909, are in this [earlier] video.
NS-919 was one of the main instigators of the Pretti encounter -- pushing the woman initially. Here is a clearer shot of him from allegedly days before Pretti died.
https://x.com/jsweetli/status/2016900430509265055?s=46&t=kf1qYlCXQnKgUhJWEIu2vg
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Looks like the officers didn’t even notice his hand gun in the first encounter. He was lucky he wasn’t arrested, shot, or disarmed then. Then he follows ICE around for more? Wild.
He probably should have been arrested that day, yes. But that's not related to his being disarmed and shot days later.
No”probably” about it. He would be alive today if he had been arrested then, as he should have been. ALL of these agitators should be arrested at first offense and carted off for processing and booking.
Most of them are standing, whistling, yelling, filming. You can't legitimately arrest them for that. The only difference is on Jan. 13 he kicked a car. That's what you'd arrest him for. That said, five ICE agents shouldn't have tackled him and broken his rib in response.
They should have cuffed him and take him in the ICE facility for a couple days to chill out. He would be alive today but no he wanted what he got.