Anonymous wrote:This MSNBC “analysis” is so condescending.
They are speaking about how they were wrong and that Americans did not allow their better angels to prevail.

Basically, we were wrong. We thought you were good people but you aren’t.

So obnoxious and self righteous and unaware even in sound defeat.

Anonymous wrote:This MSNBC “analysis” is so condescending.
They are speaking about how they were wrong and that Americans did not allow their better angels to prevail.

Basically, we were wrong. We thought you were good people but you aren’t.

So obnoxious and self righteous and unaware even in sound defeat.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Didn’t the DNC learn anything from 2016??The country is not ready for a female president, let alone a black one from the feared, “failed” state of California. A candidate like Tim Waltz would have wiped the floor with Trump. Why do we keep pushing candidates that are doomed from the start?

Do I think that Hillary would’ve been the most accomplished president this country has ever had? Yes, that is likely, but also irrelevant. We need to be pragmatic and most importantly, we need to learn from mistakes.

Yup.

Well, I think that is on Biden, and then on the democrat party establishment for supporting him so long. If he had not run earlier, we could have had a real primary. No way Harris would have been the winner of the primary. Thanks Biden!!

+1, the timing of Biden's exit made any other candidate unrealistic. And Harris is blameless here. I don't think she could have run a better campaign without literally being another person, and I actually think she's a good person, just not a great presidential candidate. She did her best and I think would have made a pretty good president.

I think we'll elect a white guy governor next. Which is fine. I'm frustrated with how misogynist this country is turning out to be (I'm a woman) but with the state of the Supreme Court and Congress, I think we have no choice but to wrap our policies in old white guy for the foreseeable future.

🥱 seriously?.. seriously? It’s not misogyny.

Trump has no real plans. This is not about policy.

Anonymous wrote:Why do women have to be likeable to be elected but men only need to have a pulse?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Joe Scarborough is trying to sound incredulous but seems giddy

Because Trump hates him and would likely imprison him.

Is Trump going to be trying to jail political enemies? Is he going to kill transgender people?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Didn’t the DNC learn anything from 2016??The country is not ready for a female president, let alone a black one from the feared, “failed” state of California. A candidate like Tim Waltz would have wiped the floor with Trump. Why do we keep pushing candidates that are doomed from the start?

Do I think that Hillary would’ve been the most accomplished president this country has ever had? Yes, that is likely, but also irrelevant. We need to be pragmatic and most importantly, we need to learn from mistakes.

Yup.

Well, I think that is on Biden, and then on the democrat party establishment for supporting him so long. If he had not run earlier, we could have had a real primary. No way Harris would have been the winner of the primary. Thanks Biden!!

+1, the timing of Biden's exit made any other candidate unrealistic. And Harris is blameless here. I don't think she could have run a better campaign without literally being another person, and I actually think she's a good person, just not a great presidential candidate. She did her best and I think would have made a pretty good president.

I think we'll elect a white guy governor next. Which is fine. I'm frustrated with how misogynist this country is turning out to be (I'm a woman) but with the state of the Supreme Court and Congress, I think we have no choice but to wrap our policies in old white guy for the foreseeable future.

🥱 seriously?.. seriously? It’s not misogyny.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Dems aren’t going to know how to process it when the first woman president turns out to be a republican.

I think Dems will know exactly how to process that, actually.

Anonymous wrote:The Dems aren’t going to know how to process it when the first woman president turns out to be a republican.

Anonymous wrote:I don’t know how they expect Democrats to continue with this President. He has no desire to represent us. He called us the enemy of the people. He is a divider not a leader.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Joe Scarborough is trying to sound incredulous but seems giddy

Because Trump hates him and would likely imprison him.

Anonymous wrote:Joe Scarborough is trying to sound incredulous but seems giddy