Anonymous
02/27/2024 18:30
Subject: GA Case
Anonymous wrote:Fani is arrogant, prideful, dishonest and thinks she can talk publicly about getting Trump off the ballot, at a church full of hatred, she needs to step down and be erased from the Bar of Georgia never to serve publicly again - shameful.
She is my hero. A strong educated Black woman that racist conservatives fear so much they are desperately trying to smear her with anything in the hope that something sticks. It won't. She will win!
Anonymous
02/27/2024 18:27
Subject: GA Case
Sorry if this has been asked and answered, but can the judge penalize the defense for stalling the trial with frivolous side-tracks?
At minimum, Fani Willis and the other guy should be reimbursed their personal legal fees.
Anonymous
02/27/2024 18:23
Subject: GA Case
Hey MAGA’s!
Have you caught on yet? We’ve been at this for a few years now.
Durham…
The Kraken cases about election integrity…
Biden impeachment…
And now this…
The headlines you are fed on right wing media never seem to hold up in court.
Have you figured out why that is?
Have you caught on yet? We’ve been at this for a few years now.
Durham…
The Kraken cases about election integrity…
Biden impeachment…
And now this…
The headlines you are fed on right wing media never seem to hold up in court.
Have you figured out why that is?
Anonymous
02/27/2024 17:46
Subject: GA Case
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Did you watch it? He IS lying!
Do you so, so, so want this sideshow to mean something that you won't accept any testimony the doesn't support your thesis?
He has such a poor memory.
They’re trying to put words in his mouth, and he’s not playing along.
This Bradley testimony is a shitshow for the defense.
It may be. It also lets observers realize the degree of incompetence of some attorneys.
Well, the partners were paid in cash by clients.
Anonymous
02/27/2024 17:26
Subject: GA Case
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Did you watch it? He IS lying!
Do you so, so, so want this sideshow to mean something that you won't accept any testimony the doesn't support your thesis?
He has such a poor memory.
They’re trying to put words in his mouth, and he’s not playing along.
This Bradley testimony is a shitshow for the defense.
It may be. It also lets observers realize the degree of incompetence of some attorneys.
The defense attorneys are the ones looking incompetent.
The person who signed the affidavit about the CallHawk data did not testify today, or was it this morning?
Anonymous
02/27/2024 17:15
Subject: GA Case
Anonymous wrote:People testify "I don't recall" either when they don't actually recall or when they recognize the Yes/No questions are meant to lead the witness into saying something they don't actually know - because if they don't then they will have perjured themselves on one of the lead up questions.
+1. As anyone who has given a deposition or testified knows, your lawyer will tell you not to speculate or guess or say things you are not certain about. If you’re even slightly not sure you remember, the answer is “I don’t recall.”
Anonymous
02/27/2024 17:08
Subject: GA Case
Just one recent headline:
"Trump said he could not recall, remember or recollect more than 30 times in his answers to Mueller"
How about we all just accept the defense only hopes to slow the case down?
"Trump said he could not recall, remember or recollect more than 30 times in his answers to Mueller"
How about we all just accept the defense only hopes to slow the case down?
Anonymous
02/27/2024 17:06
Subject: GA Case
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Did you watch it? He IS lying!
His testimony really seemed evasive.
This guy is testifying in court where he can't say anything that might be even a little inaccurate. His career is on the line. He won't say anything after swearing in that he may not know without a doubt to be true.
With such a poor memory, I can't imagine how he earned a law degree and practices law. Very sad.
What would you want your lawyer to say about you if called to the stand? As close to nothing as possible.
But you think it should be different for other people?
I would want my attorney to be able to give a definitive yes or no and not keep saying can't remember.
Then you are an idiot.
LOL You are the one who sounds like a 16 year old.
Anonymous
02/27/2024 17:06
Subject: GA Case
People testify "I don't recall" either when they don't actually recall or when they recognize the Yes/No questions are meant to lead the witness into saying something they don't actually know - because if they don't then they will have perjured themselves on one of the lead up questions.
Anonymous
02/27/2024 17:05
Subject: GA Case
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Did you watch it? He IS lying!
His testimony really seemed evasive.
This guy is testifying in court where he can't say anything that might be even a little inaccurate. His career is on the line. He won't say anything after swearing in that he may not know without a doubt to be true.
With such a poor memory, I can't imagine how he earned a law degree and practices law. Very sad.
What would you want your lawyer to say about you if called to the stand? As close to nothing as possible.
But you think it should be different for other people?
I would want my attorney to be able to give a definitive yes or no and not keep saying can't remember.
Only a terrible attorney would give a definitive yes or no answer.
How old are you? Sixteen?
In your world, attorneys should be skilled in being evasive and skirting the truth; when pressed to the wall, claim no recall. Okay. That's why many people hold attorneys in low regard.
Anonymous
02/27/2024 17:05
Subject: GA Case
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Did you watch it? He IS lying!
His testimony really seemed evasive.
This guy is testifying in court where he can't say anything that might be even a little inaccurate. His career is on the line. He won't say anything after swearing in that he may not know without a doubt to be true.
With such a poor memory, I can't imagine how he earned a law degree and practices law. Very sad.
What would you want your lawyer to say about you if called to the stand? As close to nothing as possible.
But you think it should be different for other people?
I would want my attorney to be able to give a definitive yes or no and not keep saying can't remember.
Then you are an idiot.
Anonymous
02/27/2024 17:01
Subject: GA Case
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Did you watch it? He IS lying!
His testimony really seemed evasive.
This guy is testifying in court where he can't say anything that might be even a little inaccurate. His career is on the line. He won't say anything after swearing in that he may not know without a doubt to be true.
With such a poor memory, I can't imagine how he earned a law degree and practices law. Very sad.
What would you want your lawyer to say about you if called to the stand? As close to nothing as possible.
But you think it should be different for other people?
I would want my attorney to be able to give a definitive yes or no and not keep saying can't remember.
Only a terrible attorney would give a definitive yes or no answer.
How old are you? Sixteen?
Anonymous
02/27/2024 16:59
Subject: GA Case
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Did you watch it? He IS lying!
Do you so, so, so want this sideshow to mean something that you won't accept any testimony the doesn't support your thesis?
He has such a poor memory.
They’re trying to put words in his mouth, and he’s not playing along.
This Bradley testimony is a shitshow for the defense.
I'm just shocked that someone with such poor recall of events could be a practicing attorney.
No, you are not. You are shocked that an attorney is parsing his words like an attorney. What did you think was going to happen?
Listen. I'm no Trump supporter and used to admire Fani Willis. I can see her smarts, although she's also shown poor judgment. This guy seems not so bright.
Anonymous
02/27/2024 16:58
Subject: GA Case
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Did you watch it? He IS lying!
His testimony really seemed evasive.
This guy is testifying in court where he can't say anything that might be even a little inaccurate. His career is on the line. He won't say anything after swearing in that he may not know without a doubt to be true.
With such a poor memory, I can't imagine how he earned a law degree and practices law. Very sad.
What would you want your lawyer to say about you if called to the stand? As close to nothing as possible.
But you think it should be different for other people?
I would want my attorney to be able to give a definitive yes or no and not keep saying can't remember.
Anonymous
02/27/2024 16:57
Subject: GA Case
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Did you watch it? He IS lying!
Do you so, so, so want this sideshow to mean something that you won't accept any testimony the doesn't support your thesis?
He has such a poor memory.
They’re trying to put words in his mouth, and he’s not playing along.
This Bradley testimony is a shitshow for the defense.
I'm just shocked that someone with such poor recall of events could be a practicing attorney.
No, you are not. You are shocked that an attorney is parsing his words like an attorney. What did you think was going to happen?