Anonymous wrote:I don't really care that the misogynists on the site are going after all the women. Let them continue to slobber over Boldoni and his "sexy" and porn addiction comments. I will simply continue to enjoy the fact that he was dropped by WME, period, and compelled to fork over what little wealth he has on legal fees.

Too stupid to realize that he isn’t paying his legal fees, WF is.

Looks like the misogynist persona is back. The texts were pretty embarrassing for Reynolds/Lively and someone was triggered.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ha, keep trying to make fetch happen. Those 2 are not prominent liberals in any meaningful way. Signed, an actual lifelong liberal who sees what you're trying to do by constantly bringing up Maga.

Another +1.

They are both trash. Read the perspective on a primarily Black message board.

Yes Lively triggers most black people. She feels like a Carolyn Bryant. Watching people defend her and jump through mental gymnastics to explain why she and her husband should be able to label this man a predator for saying “I like your outfit” triggers a certain ptsd. And to the extent it’s political at all, it’s only in that it shows cracks in the Democratic Party. The Democratic Party is a big tent and there’s an ocean between the average black person (almost all of whom are democrats) and anyone supporting lively in the name of feminism (also democrats).

He didn't compliment her outfit. She was wearing a coat, bent down to pick something up and it opened to where her cleavage was exposed, then he said he liked her outfit while gesturing at his chest. He's a creep.

There is enough evidence to establish 100% he's a creep. Also telling that he only started behaving like this when he came into a position of power over women.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ha, keep trying to make fetch happen. Those 2 are not prominent liberals in any meaningful way. Signed, an actual lifelong liberal who sees what you're trying to do by constantly bringing up Maga.

Another +1.

They are both trash. Read the perspective on a primarily Black message board.

Yes Lively triggers most black people. She feels like a Carolyn Bryant. Watching people defend her and jump through mental gymnastics to explain why she and her husband should be able to label this man a predator for saying “I like your outfit” triggers a certain ptsd. And to the extent it’s political at all, it’s only in that it shows cracks in the Democratic Party. The Democratic Party is a big tent and there’s an ocean between the average black person (almost all of whom are democrats) and anyone supporting lively in the name of feminism (also democrats).

He didn't compliment her outfit. She was wearing a coat, bent down to pick something up and it opened to where her cleavage was exposed, then he said he liked her outfit while gesturing at his chest. He's a creep.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't really care that the misogynists on the site are going after all the women. Let them continue to slobber over Boldoni and his "sexy" and porn addiction comments. I will simply continue to enjoy the fact that he was dropped by WME, period, and compelled to fork over what little wealth he has on legal fees.

And the rest of us will enjoy the fact that, aside from a few misguided women who thinks being a feminist means blindly supporting all when, the public has turned on Blake lively and she’ll never work again in Hollywood.

Really? She seems to have a Lionsgate film in the works.
https://deadline.com/2025/08/blake-lively-to-star-the-survival-list-lionsgate-1236494593/

LOL no. This was a blatant PR move. She is producing this film and there are no others attached except I think a writer.

Go to her IMDB. She has two other movies attached, but they are clearly not being made. One has not been updated since May 2017 when her casting was announced. She has probably aged out of that role. The other has not been updated since August 2020.

Movies get announced all the time but very few get made.

Interestingly enough, a movie with this exact same plot is coming out this weekend starring Rachel McAdams called Send Help. Blake’s is not even remotely an original idea and it likely wont be made.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Lively's lawsuit is moving forward, while Boldoni's countersuit was dismissed. The judges carefully read and weighed the evidence, unlike you fools. There are TEN separate complaints in evidence against Boldoni, most of which have nothing to do with Lively. Real champions of women, you guys.

The judge has not decided Lively’s lawsuit is moving forward. That’s what he’s weighing right now. Most of her case will get kicked before trial. Baldoni’s case was only kicked due tor privilege, not on the merits. Blake has conniving lawyers who set it up well, as we say with Vanzan, but that has nothing to do whatsoever with who’s right and who’s wooing.

DP. I agree much of Blake's case will likely be dismissed before trial, with perhaps only contract issues proceeding. Very likely.

But it's inaccurate to say Baldoni's case was only dismissed due to privilege. His complaint had huge fundamental flaws, and it's telling he chose not to replead when given the chance.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't really care that the misogynists on the site are going after all the women. Let them continue to slobber over Boldoni and his "sexy" and porn addiction comments. I will simply continue to enjoy the fact that he was dropped by WME, period, and compelled to fork over what little wealth he has on legal fees.

And the rest of us will enjoy the fact that, aside from a few misguided women who thinks being a feminist means blindly supporting all when, the public has turned on Blake lively and she’ll never work again in Hollywood.

Really? She seems to have a Lionsgate film in the works.
https://deadline.com/2025/08/blake-lively-to-star-the-survival-list-lionsgate-1236494593/

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't really care that the misogynists on the site are going after all the women. Let them continue to slobber over Boldoni and his "sexy" and porn addiction comments. I will simply continue to enjoy the fact that he was dropped by WME, period, and compelled to fork over what little wealth he has on legal fees.

And the rest of us will enjoy the fact that, aside from a few misguided women who thinks being a feminist means blindly supporting all when, the public has turned on Blake lively and she’ll never work again in Hollywood.

Last I heard, she is still repped by prestigious WME while Bodoni is repped by, let me see let me see, no one. And has zero projects in the works.

Anonymous wrote:I don't really care that the misogynists on the site are going after all the women. Let them continue to slobber over Boldoni and his "sexy" and porn addiction comments. I will simply continue to enjoy the fact that he was dropped by WME, period, and compelled to fork over what little wealth he has on legal fees.

And the rest of us will enjoy the fact that, aside from a few misguided women who thinks being a feminist means blindly supporting all when, the public has turned on Blake lively and she’ll never work again in Hollywood.

Anonymous wrote:Lively's lawsuit is moving forward, while Boldoni's countersuit was dismissed. The judges carefully read and weighed the evidence, unlike you fools. There are TEN separate complaints in evidence against Boldoni, most of which have nothing to do with Lively. Real champions of women, you guys.

The judge has not decided Lively’s lawsuit is moving forward. That’s what he’s weighing right now. Most of her case will get kicked before trial. Baldoni’s case was only kicked due tor privilege, not on the merits. Blake has conniving lawyers who set it up well, as we say with Vanzan, but that has nothing to do whatsoever with who’s right and who’s wooing.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ha, keep trying to make fetch happen. Those 2 are not prominent liberals in any meaningful way. Signed, an actual lifelong liberal who sees what you're trying to do by constantly bringing up Maga.

Another +1.

They are both trash. Read the perspective on a primarily Black message board.

Yes Lively triggers most black people. She feels like a Carolyn Bryant. Watching people defend her and jump through mental gymnastics to explain why she and her husband should be able to label this man a predator for saying “I like your outfit” triggers a certain ptsd. And to the extent it’s political at all, it’s only in that it shows cracks in the Democratic Party. The Democratic Party is a big tent and there’s an ocean between the average black person (almost all of whom are democrats) and anyone supporting lively in the name of feminism (also democrats).

Well thank God we have judges to sort this out and triggered women who deal in emotions and not facts.

It’s such a joke that you, a woman, respond to PP’s actual insight with your own misogyny - because she can make a point, and you cannot. Heal thyself, “triggered woman.”

I don't really care that the misogynists on the site are going after all the women. Let them continue to slobber over Boldoni and his "sexy" and porn addiction comments. I will simply continue to enjoy the fact that he was dropped by WME, period, and compelled to fork over what little wealth he has on legal fees.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ha, keep trying to make fetch happen. Those 2 are not prominent liberals in any meaningful way. Signed, an actual lifelong liberal who sees what you're trying to do by constantly bringing up Maga.

Another +1.

They are both trash. Read the perspective on a primarily Black message board.

Yes Lively triggers most black people. She feels like a Carolyn Bryant. Watching people defend her and jump through mental gymnastics to explain why she and her husband should be able to label this man a predator for saying “I like your outfit” triggers a certain ptsd. And to the extent it’s political at all, it’s only in that it shows cracks in the Democratic Party. The Democratic Party is a big tent and there’s an ocean between the average black person (almost all of whom are democrats) and anyone supporting lively in the name of feminism (also democrats).

Well thank God we have judges to sort this out and triggered women who deal in emotions and not facts.

Lively's lawsuit is moving forward, while Boldoni's countersuit was dismissed. The judges carefully read and weighed the evidence, unlike you fools. There are TEN separate complaints in evidence against Boldoni, most of which have nothing to do with Lively. Real champions of women, you guys.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ha, keep trying to make fetch happen. Those 2 are not prominent liberals in any meaningful way. Signed, an actual lifelong liberal who sees what you're trying to do by constantly bringing up Maga.

Another +1.

They are both trash. Read the perspective on a primarily Black message board.

Yes Lively triggers most black people. She feels like a Carolyn Bryant. Watching people defend her and jump through mental gymnastics to explain why she and her husband should be able to label this man a predator for saying “I like your outfit” triggers a certain ptsd. And to the extent it’s political at all, it’s only in that it shows cracks in the Democratic Party. The Democratic Party is a big tent and there’s an ocean between the average black person (almost all of whom are democrats) and anyone supporting lively in the name of feminism (also democrats).