Anonymous
02/27/2024 16:56
Subject: GA Case
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Did you watch it? He IS lying!
Do you so, so, so want this sideshow to mean something that you won't accept any testimony the doesn't support your thesis?
He has such a poor memory.
They’re trying to put words in his mouth, and he’s not playing along.
This Bradley testimony is a shitshow for the defense.
It may be. It also lets observers realize the degree of incompetence of some attorneys.
Anonymous
02/27/2024 16:54
Subject: GA Case
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Did you watch it? He IS lying!
Do you so, so, so want this sideshow to mean something that you won't accept any testimony the doesn't support your thesis?
He has such a poor memory.
They’re trying to put words in his mouth, and he’s not playing along.
This Bradley testimony is a shitshow for the defense.
I'm just shocked that someone with such poor recall of events could be a practicing attorney.
Anonymous
02/27/2024 16:48
Subject: GA Case
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Did you watch it? He IS lying!
Do you so, so, so want this sideshow to mean something that you won't accept any testimony the doesn't support your thesis?
He has such a poor memory.
They’re trying to put words in his mouth, and he’s not playing along.
This Bradley testimony is a shitshow for the defense.
Anonymous
02/27/2024 16:43
Subject: GA Case
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Did you watch it? He IS lying!
His testimony really seemed evasive.
This guy is testifying in court where he can't say anything that might be even a little inaccurate. His career is on the line. He won't say anything after swearing in that he may not know without a doubt to be true.
With such a poor memory, I can't imagine how he earned a law degree and practices law. Very sad.
What would you want your lawyer to say about you if called to the stand? As close to nothing as possible.
But you think it should be different for other people?
Anonymous
02/27/2024 16:43
Subject: GA Case
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Did you watch it? He IS lying!
Do you so, so, so want this sideshow to mean something that you won't accept any testimony the doesn't support your thesis?
He has such a poor memory.
Anonymous
02/27/2024 16:41
Subject: GA Case
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Did you watch it? He IS lying!
His testimony really seemed evasive.
This guy is testifying in court where he can't say anything that might be even a little inaccurate. His career is on the line. He won't say anything after swearing in that he may not know without a doubt to be true.
With such a poor memory, I can't imagine how he earned a law degree and practices law. Very sad.
Anonymous
02/27/2024 16:31
Subject: GA Case
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So interesting to see the liberal mind at work. GA team is looking to prosecute individuals for making false statements while having difficulty making truthful statements on the stand themselves. So much for officers of the court meeting minimal ethical standards.
On the NY case, what a wonderful waste of NY taxpayer money. Clearly the decision will be overturned on appeal but the damage has already been done. Businesses are leaving NY and more will do so rather than deal the possibility of selective prosecution.
Waste of money?
The state made a fortune!
It will be appealed and also larger businesses are leaving NYC. They don't need the hassle.
Right, and truckers shut down NYC last week.
Anonymous
02/27/2024 16:31
Subject: GA Case
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Did you watch it? He IS lying!
His testimony really seemed evasive.
This guy is testifying in court where he can't say anything that might be even a little inaccurate. His career is on the line. He won't say anything after swearing in that he may not know without a doubt to be true.
Anonymous
02/27/2024 16:29
Subject: Re:GA Case
So are we done with this rabbit hole now?
Can the court get back to trump’s attempt to disenfranchise Georgia voters?
Can the court get back to trump’s attempt to disenfranchise Georgia voters?
Anonymous
02/27/2024 16:29
Subject: GA Case
Anonymous wrote:
Did you watch it? He IS lying!
Then the defense needs to prove he is lying. So far, there is nothing to make their case. Willis should continue as DA and the case should move forward.
Enough of this distracting nonsense.
Anonymous
02/27/2024 16:29
Subject: GA Case
Anonymous wrote:Fani is arrogant, prideful, dishonest and thinks she can talk publicly about getting Trump off the ballot, at a church full of hatred, she needs to step down and be erased from the Bar of Georgia never to serve publicly again - shameful.
She doesn't care. She already has enough years to collect a full pension.
Anonymous
02/27/2024 16:28
Subject: GA Case
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Did you watch it? He IS lying!
His testimony really seemed evasive.
Asking a lawyer for his opinion and for private information about his client on the stand?
He didn't want to answer any of the questions. This whole slideshow has been absolutely insane. I'm not sure if these posters realize how incredible, how outside the norm, all of this is.
Anonymous
02/27/2024 16:27
Subject: GA Case
Anonymous wrote:
Did you watch it? He IS lying!
Do you so, so, so want this sideshow to mean something that you won't accept any testimony the doesn't support your thesis?
Anonymous
02/27/2024 16:25
Subject: GA Case
Anonymous wrote:
Did you watch it? He IS lying!
His testimony really seemed evasive.
Anonymous
02/27/2024 16:22
Subject: GA Case