Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Your cause also includes calling people who don’t care for biking as “bigots”. You’re nuts.

If you don't like to bicycle, that doesn't make you bigot.

If you obsessively hate on "bikers", then yeah, you're a bigot.

Anonymous wrote:
Your cause also includes calling people who don’t care for biking as “bigots”. You’re nuts.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Riding a bike in a major city is inherently dangerous. I know bicyclists are 100 percent in denial about the risks they are taking. But it is extremely dangerous and there's nothing the government can do to turn it into something that's even somewhat safe.

That's a silly thing to say. There's nothing inherently dangerous about riding a bicycle, major city or no major city. The danger comes from cars and their drivers. So, how can we make it safer for people to ride a bicycle? By adding safe bicycle infrastructure. Which will, in turn, encourage more people to ride a bicycle, and that will also make it safer for people to ride a bicycle.

This bike hatred on DCUM is pure bigotry. There is no such thing as a "biker". We are people. When we ride a bicycle, we are bicyclists. When we take the bus, we are bus riders. When we walk, we are pedestrians. When we drive, we are drivers.

If you, personally, don't want to ride a bicycle, that's fine. Nobody is going to force you to ride a bicycle.

Car drivers who drive dangerously should be held to account. So should bikers who don't obey the traffic laws, fail to stop at stop signs and signals and don't yield the right of way to pedestrians. These idiots who think they're riding in the Tour de F@#$ give other sub/urban cyclists a bad name.

But, in fact, car drivers who drive dangerously are not held to account (whatever you mean by that). And when car drivers drive dangerously, it endangers everyone on the street. If you're truly concerned for the safety of people riding bicycles, you should support safe bicycle infrastructure.

If you only want to continue your bigotry, keep doing what you're doing.

"Bigotry"?! Take a deep breath and think before you type - or hype. You must be overdue for your nap time in your mother's basement.

Did this person seriously accuse people who don’t care about biking as bigots? Talk about losing perspective. Furthers my thesis that bikers are the biggest whiners. Now adding a persecution complex to the mix.

No, this person said, "This bike hatred on DCUM is pure bigotry."

If you don't want to bike, you're not a bigot. If you hate on "bikers", then yeah, you're a bigot.

This is great. I encourage you continue to use this language publicly to further your biking cause.

My biking cause is that I would like to be able to go places safely by bike instead of having to drive everywhere. No, that's not true - my biking cause is also that I would like for my children to be able to go places by bike instead of having to be driven everywhere.

Your cause also includes calling people who don’t care for biking as “bigots”. You’re nuts.

Define bigot. Shoe fits.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Riding a bike in a major city is inherently dangerous. I know bicyclists are 100 percent in denial about the risks they are taking. But it is extremely dangerous and there's nothing the government can do to turn it into something that's even somewhat safe.

That's a silly thing to say. There's nothing inherently dangerous about riding a bicycle, major city or no major city. The danger comes from cars and their drivers. So, how can we make it safer for people to ride a bicycle? By adding safe bicycle infrastructure. Which will, in turn, encourage more people to ride a bicycle, and that will also make it safer for people to ride a bicycle.

This bike hatred on DCUM is pure bigotry. There is no such thing as a "biker". We are people. When we ride a bicycle, we are bicyclists. When we take the bus, we are bus riders. When we walk, we are pedestrians. When we drive, we are drivers.

If you, personally, don't want to ride a bicycle, that's fine. Nobody is going to force you to ride a bicycle.

Car drivers who drive dangerously should be held to account. So should bikers who don't obey the traffic laws, fail to stop at stop signs and signals and don't yield the right of way to pedestrians. These idiots who think they're riding in the Tour de F@#$ give other sub/urban cyclists a bad name.

But, in fact, car drivers who drive dangerously are not held to account (whatever you mean by that). And when car drivers drive dangerously, it endangers everyone on the street. If you're truly concerned for the safety of people riding bicycles, you should support safe bicycle infrastructure.

If you only want to continue your bigotry, keep doing what you're doing.

"Bigotry"?! Take a deep breath and think before you type - or hype. You must be overdue for your nap time in your mother's basement.

Did this person seriously accuse people who don’t care about biking as bigots? Talk about losing perspective. Furthers my thesis that bikers are the biggest whiners. Now adding a persecution complex to the mix.

No, this person said, "This bike hatred on DCUM is pure bigotry."

If you don't want to bike, you're not a bigot. If you hate on "bikers", then yeah, you're a bigot.

This is great. I encourage you continue to use this language publicly to further your biking cause.

My biking cause is that I would like to be able to go places safely by bike instead of having to drive everywhere. No, that's not true - my biking cause is also that I would like for my children to be able to go places by bike instead of having to be driven everywhere.

Your cause also includes calling people who don’t care for biking as “bigots”. You’re nuts.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Riding a bike in a major city is inherently dangerous. I know bicyclists are 100 percent in denial about the risks they are taking. But it is extremely dangerous and there's nothing the government can do to turn it into something that's even somewhat safe.

That's a silly thing to say. There's nothing inherently dangerous about riding a bicycle, major city or no major city. The danger comes from cars and their drivers. So, how can we make it safer for people to ride a bicycle? By adding safe bicycle infrastructure. Which will, in turn, encourage more people to ride a bicycle, and that will also make it safer for people to ride a bicycle.

This bike hatred on DCUM is pure bigotry. There is no such thing as a "biker". We are people. When we ride a bicycle, we are bicyclists. When we take the bus, we are bus riders. When we walk, we are pedestrians. When we drive, we are drivers.

If you, personally, don't want to ride a bicycle, that's fine. Nobody is going to force you to ride a bicycle.

Car drivers who drive dangerously should be held to account. So should bikers who don't obey the traffic laws, fail to stop at stop signs and signals and don't yield the right of way to pedestrians. These idiots who think they're riding in the Tour de F@#$ give other sub/urban cyclists a bad name.

But, in fact, car drivers who drive dangerously are not held to account (whatever you mean by that). And when car drivers drive dangerously, it endangers everyone on the street. If you're truly concerned for the safety of people riding bicycles, you should support safe bicycle infrastructure.

If you only want to continue your bigotry, keep doing what you're doing.

"Bigotry"?! Take a deep breath and think before you type - or hype. You must be overdue for your nap time in your mother's basement.

Did this person seriously accuse people who don’t care about biking as bigots? Talk about losing perspective. Furthers my thesis that bikers are the biggest whiners. Now adding a persecution complex to the mix.

No, this person said, "This bike hatred on DCUM is pure bigotry."

If you don't want to bike, you're not a bigot. If you hate on "bikers", then yeah, you're a bigot.

This is great. I encourage you continue to use this language publicly to further your biking cause.

My biking cause is that I would like to be able to go places safely by bike instead of having to drive everywhere. No, that's not true - my biking cause is also that I would like for my children to be able to go places by bike instead of having to be driven everywhere.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Riding a bike in a major city is inherently dangerous. I know bicyclists are 100 percent in denial about the risks they are taking. But it is extremely dangerous and there's nothing the government can do to turn it into something that's even somewhat safe.

That's a silly thing to say. There's nothing inherently dangerous about riding a bicycle, major city or no major city. The danger comes from cars and their drivers. So, how can we make it safer for people to ride a bicycle? By adding safe bicycle infrastructure. Which will, in turn, encourage more people to ride a bicycle, and that will also make it safer for people to ride a bicycle.

This bike hatred on DCUM is pure bigotry. There is no such thing as a "biker". We are people. When we ride a bicycle, we are bicyclists. When we take the bus, we are bus riders. When we walk, we are pedestrians. When we drive, we are drivers.

If you, personally, don't want to ride a bicycle, that's fine. Nobody is going to force you to ride a bicycle.

Car drivers who drive dangerously should be held to account. So should bikers who don't obey the traffic laws, fail to stop at stop signs and signals and don't yield the right of way to pedestrians. These idiots who think they're riding in the Tour de F@#$ give other sub/urban cyclists a bad name.

But, in fact, car drivers who drive dangerously are not held to account (whatever you mean by that). And when car drivers drive dangerously, it endangers everyone on the street. If you're truly concerned for the safety of people riding bicycles, you should support safe bicycle infrastructure.

If you only want to continue your bigotry, keep doing what you're doing.

"Bigotry"?! Take a deep breath and think before you type - or hype. You must be overdue for your nap time in your mother's basement.

Did this person seriously accuse people who don’t care about biking as bigots? Talk about losing perspective. Furthers my thesis that bikers are the biggest whiners. Now adding a persecution complex to the mix.

No, this person said, "This bike hatred on DCUM is pure bigotry."

If you don't want to bike, you're not a bigot. If you hate on "bikers", then yeah, you're a bigot.

This is great. I encourage you continue to use this language publicly to further your biking cause.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Riding a bike in a major city is inherently dangerous. I know bicyclists are 100 percent in denial about the risks they are taking. But it is extremely dangerous and there's nothing the government can do to turn it into something that's even somewhat safe.

That's a silly thing to say. There's nothing inherently dangerous about riding a bicycle, major city or no major city. The danger comes from cars and their drivers. So, how can we make it safer for people to ride a bicycle? By adding safe bicycle infrastructure. Which will, in turn, encourage more people to ride a bicycle, and that will also make it safer for people to ride a bicycle.

This bike hatred on DCUM is pure bigotry. There is no such thing as a "biker". We are people. When we ride a bicycle, we are bicyclists. When we take the bus, we are bus riders. When we walk, we are pedestrians. When we drive, we are drivers.

If you, personally, don't want to ride a bicycle, that's fine. Nobody is going to force you to ride a bicycle.

Car drivers who drive dangerously should be held to account. So should bikers who don't obey the traffic laws, fail to stop at stop signs and signals and don't yield the right of way to pedestrians. These idiots who think they're riding in the Tour de F@#$ give other sub/urban cyclists a bad name.

But, in fact, car drivers who drive dangerously are not held to account (whatever you mean by that). And when car drivers drive dangerously, it endangers everyone on the street. If you're truly concerned for the safety of people riding bicycles, you should support safe bicycle infrastructure.

If you only want to continue your bigotry, keep doing what you're doing.

"Bigotry"?! Take a deep breath and think before you type - or hype. You must be overdue for your nap time in your mother's basement.

Did this person seriously accuse people who don’t care about biking as bigots? Talk about losing perspective. Furthers my thesis that bikers are the biggest whiners. Now adding a persecution complex to the mix.

No, this person said, "This bike hatred on DCUM is pure bigotry."

If you don't want to bike, you're not a bigot. If you hate on "bikers", then yeah, you're a bigot.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Riding a bike in a major city is inherently dangerous. I know bicyclists are 100 percent in denial about the risks they are taking. But it is extremely dangerous and there's nothing the government can do to turn it into something that's even somewhat safe.

That's a silly thing to say. There's nothing inherently dangerous about riding a bicycle, major city or no major city. The danger comes from cars and their drivers. So, how can we make it safer for people to ride a bicycle? By adding safe bicycle infrastructure. Which will, in turn, encourage more people to ride a bicycle, and that will also make it safer for people to ride a bicycle.

This bike hatred on DCUM is pure bigotry. There is no such thing as a "biker". We are people. When we ride a bicycle, we are bicyclists. When we take the bus, we are bus riders. When we walk, we are pedestrians. When we drive, we are drivers.

If you, personally, don't want to ride a bicycle, that's fine. Nobody is going to force you to ride a bicycle.

Car drivers who drive dangerously should be held to account. So should bikers who don't obey the traffic laws, fail to stop at stop signs and signals and don't yield the right of way to pedestrians. These idiots who think they're riding in the Tour de F@#$ give other sub/urban cyclists a bad name.

But, in fact, car drivers who drive dangerously are not held to account (whatever you mean by that). And when car drivers drive dangerously, it endangers everyone on the street. If you're truly concerned for the safety of people riding bicycles, you should support safe bicycle infrastructure.

If you only want to continue your bigotry, keep doing what you're doing.

"Bigotry"?! Take a deep breath and think before you type - or hype. You must be overdue for your nap time in your mother's basement.

Did this person seriously accuse people who don’t care about biking as bigots? Talk about losing perspective. Furthers my thesis that bikers are the biggest whiners. Now adding a persecution complex to the mix.

Anonymous wrote:

Riding a bike in a major city is inherently dangerous. I know bicyclists are 100 percent in denial about the risks they are taking. But it is extremely dangerous and there's nothing the government can do to turn it into something that's even somewhat safe.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Riding a bike in a major city is inherently dangerous. I know bicyclists are 100 percent in denial about the risks they are taking. But it is extremely dangerous and there's nothing the government can do to turn it into something that's even somewhat safe.

That's a silly thing to say. There's nothing inherently dangerous about riding a bicycle, major city or no major city. The danger comes from cars and their drivers. So, how can we make it safer for people to ride a bicycle? By adding safe bicycle infrastructure. Which will, in turn, encourage more people to ride a bicycle, and that will also make it safer for people to ride a bicycle.

This bike hatred on DCUM is pure bigotry. There is no such thing as a "biker". We are people. When we ride a bicycle, we are bicyclists. When we take the bus, we are bus riders. When we walk, we are pedestrians. When we drive, we are drivers.

If you, personally, don't want to ride a bicycle, that's fine. Nobody is going to force you to ride a bicycle.

Car drivers who drive dangerously should be held to account. So should bikers who don't obey the traffic laws, fail to stop at stop signs and signals and don't yield the right of way to pedestrians. These idiots who think they're riding in the Tour de F@#$ give other sub/urban cyclists a bad name.

But, in fact, car drivers who drive dangerously are not held to account (whatever you mean by that). And when car drivers drive dangerously, it endangers everyone on the street. If you're truly concerned for the safety of people riding bicycles, you should support safe bicycle infrastructure.

If you only want to continue your bigotry, keep doing what you're doing.

"Bigotry"?! Take a deep breath and think before you type - or hype. You must be overdue for your nap time in your mother's basement.

Did this person seriously accuse people who don’t care about biking as bigots? Talk about losing perspective. Furthers my thesis that bikers are the biggest whiners. Now adding a persecution complex to the mix.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Riding a bike in a major city is inherently dangerous. I know bicyclists are 100 percent in denial about the risks they are taking. But it is extremely dangerous and there's nothing the government can do to turn it into something that's even somewhat safe.

That's a silly thing to say. There's nothing inherently dangerous about riding a bicycle, major city or no major city. The danger comes from cars and their drivers. So, how can we make it safer for people to ride a bicycle? By adding safe bicycle infrastructure. Which will, in turn, encourage more people to ride a bicycle, and that will also make it safer for people to ride a bicycle.

This bike hatred on DCUM is pure bigotry. There is no such thing as a "biker". We are people. When we ride a bicycle, we are bicyclists. When we take the bus, we are bus riders. When we walk, we are pedestrians. When we drive, we are drivers.

If you, personally, don't want to ride a bicycle, that's fine. Nobody is going to force you to ride a bicycle.

Car drivers who drive dangerously should be held to account. So should bikers who don't obey the traffic laws, fail to stop at stop signs and signals and don't yield the right of way to pedestrians. These idiots who think they're riding in the Tour de F@#$ give other sub/urban cyclists a bad name.

But, in fact, car drivers who drive dangerously are not held to account (whatever you mean by that). And when car drivers drive dangerously, it endangers everyone on the street. If you're truly concerned for the safety of people riding bicycles, you should support safe bicycle infrastructure.

If you only want to continue your bigotry, keep doing what you're doing.

"Bigotry"?! Take a deep breath and think before you type - or hype. You must be overdue for your nap time in your mother's basement.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Riding a bike in a major city is inherently dangerous. I know bicyclists are 100 percent in denial about the risks they are taking. But it is extremely dangerous and there's nothing the government can do to turn it into something that's even somewhat safe.

That's a silly thing to say. There's nothing inherently dangerous about riding a bicycle, major city or no major city. The danger comes from cars and their drivers. So, how can we make it safer for people to ride a bicycle? By adding safe bicycle infrastructure. Which will, in turn, encourage more people to ride a bicycle, and that will also make it safer for people to ride a bicycle.

This bike hatred on DCUM is pure bigotry. There is no such thing as a "biker". We are people. When we ride a bicycle, we are bicyclists. When we take the bus, we are bus riders. When we walk, we are pedestrians. When we drive, we are drivers.

If you, personally, don't want to ride a bicycle, that's fine. Nobody is going to force you to ride a bicycle.

Car drivers who drive dangerously should be held to account. So should bikers who don't obey the traffic laws, fail to stop at stop signs and signals and don't yield the right of way to pedestrians. These idiots who think they're riding in the Tour de F@#$ give other sub/urban cyclists a bad name.

But, in fact, car drivers who drive dangerously are not held to account (whatever you mean by that). And when car drivers drive dangerously, it endangers everyone on the street. If you're truly concerned for the safety of people riding bicycles, you should support safe bicycle infrastructure.

If you only want to continue your bigotry, keep doing what you're doing.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Riding a bike in a major city is inherently dangerous. I know bicyclists are 100 percent in denial about the risks they are taking. But it is extremely dangerous and there's nothing the government can do to turn it into something that's even somewhat safe.

That's a silly thing to say. There's nothing inherently dangerous about riding a bicycle, major city or no major city. The danger comes from cars and their drivers. So, how can we make it safer for people to ride a bicycle? By adding safe bicycle infrastructure. Which will, in turn, encourage more people to ride a bicycle, and that will also make it safer for people to ride a bicycle.

This bike hatred on DCUM is pure bigotry. There is no such thing as a "biker". We are people. When we ride a bicycle, we are bicyclists. When we take the bus, we are bus riders. When we walk, we are pedestrians. When we drive, we are drivers.

If you, personally, don't want to ride a bicycle, that's fine. Nobody is going to force you to ride a bicycle.

Car drivers who drive dangerously should be held to account. So should bikers who don't obey the traffic laws, fail to stop at stop signs and signals and don't yield the right of way to pedestrians. These idiots who think they're riding in the Tour de F@#$ give other sub/urban cyclists a bad name.

But, in fact, car drivers who drive dangerously are not held to account (whatever you mean by that). And when car drivers drive dangerously, it endangers everyone on the street. If you're truly concerned for the safety of people riding bicycles, you should support safe bicycle infrastructure.

If you only want to continue your bigotry, keep doing what you're doing.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Riding a bike in a major city is inherently dangerous. I know bicyclists are 100 percent in denial about the risks they are taking. But it is extremely dangerous and there's nothing the government can do to turn it into something that's even somewhat safe.

That's a silly thing to say. There's nothing inherently dangerous about riding a bicycle, major city or no major city. The danger comes from cars and their drivers. So, how can we make it safer for people to ride a bicycle? By adding safe bicycle infrastructure. Which will, in turn, encourage more people to ride a bicycle, and that will also make it safer for people to ride a bicycle.

This bike hatred on DCUM is pure bigotry. There is no such thing as a "biker". We are people. When we ride a bicycle, we are bicyclists. When we take the bus, we are bus riders. When we walk, we are pedestrians. When we drive, we are drivers.

If you, personally, don't want to ride a bicycle, that's fine. Nobody is going to force you to ride a bicycle.

Car drivers who drive dangerously should be held to account. So should bikers who don't obey the traffic laws, fail to stop at stop signs and signals and don't yield the right of way to pedestrians. These idiots who think they're riding in the Tour de F@#$ give other sub/urban cyclists a bad name.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Riding a bike in a major city is inherently dangerous. I know bicyclists are 100 percent in denial about the risks they are taking. But it is extremely dangerous and there's nothing the government can do to turn it into something that's even somewhat safe.

That's a silly thing to say. There's nothing inherently dangerous about riding a bicycle, major city or no major city. The danger comes from cars and their drivers. So, how can we make it safer for people to ride a bicycle? By adding safe bicycle infrastructure. Which will, in turn, encourage more people to ride a bicycle, and that will also make it safer for people to ride a bicycle.

This bike hatred on DCUM is pure bigotry. There is no such thing as a "biker". We are people. When we ride a bicycle, we are bicyclists. When we take the bus, we are bus riders. When we walk, we are pedestrians. When we drive, we are drivers.

If you, personally, don't want to ride a bicycle, that's fine. Nobody is going to force you to ride a bicycle.