Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Uh yeah this notion that the quick kids will effectively become teacher assistants once they learn the material is exactly what many of us are mad about!!!
The best way to master content is to be able to teach to someone else.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Why assume the work won’t be challenging in different ways?
Well, the classroom teachers on this thread and the ones I know IRL are stating that they won't be able to challenge the top kids in heterogeneous classes. There's only so much a teacher can do if the lesson is on adding two digit numbers, some kids are still struggling to add single digit numbers, while others mastered this skill in preschool. The only examples that have been given are group projects and drafting the advanced kids to act as teachers' helpers. That might be "challenging in different ways," but it won't be challenging in the right way.
Anonymous wrote:
Why assume the work won’t be challenging in different ways?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
On the flip side, how would his life meaningfully change if he didn’t take AP Calculus until 12th grade?
I don't know. How would a kid's life meaningfully change if the kid was reading chapter books in K, but then got stuck doing BOB books for the next two years? The powers that be never want to force kids into language arts programs that are remedial for them, but they're certainly eager to do so with math.
Anonymous wrote:Honest question. I'm very thankful my son is in 10th grade and this won't impact him and my youngest was moved to private after the public schools bungled the pandemic.
However my oldest is naturally gifted in math. He takes AP calc in 10th grade and finds it easy. His Q3 grade was a 99. His overall grade right now is a 98.
What happens to a kid like him who had his multiplication tables memorized by 2nd grade?
Does he just wither on a vine? If math were a sport he'd be an elite athlete. It would be like putting a teenager LeBron James on a rec team for basketball.
how very DCUM of you.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Honest question. I'm very thankful my son is in 10th grade and this won't impact him and my youngest was moved to private after the public schools bungled the pandemic.
However my oldest is naturally gifted in math. He takes AP calc in 10th grade and finds it easy. His Q3 grade was a 99. His overall grade right now is a 98.
What happens to a kid like him who had his multiplication tables memorized by 2nd grade?
Does he just wither on a vine? If math were a sport he'd be an elite athlete. It would be like putting a teenager LeBron James on a rec team for basketball.
On the flip side, how would his life meaningfully change if he didn’t take AP Calculus until 12th grade?
Anonymous wrote:
On the flip side, how would his life meaningfully change if he didn’t take AP Calculus until 12th grade?
Anonymous wrote:Honest question. I'm very thankful my son is in 10th grade and this won't impact him and my youngest was moved to private after the public schools bungled the pandemic.
However my oldest is naturally gifted in math. He takes AP calc in 10th grade and finds it easy. His Q3 grade was a 99. His overall grade right now is a 98.
What happens to a kid like him who had his multiplication tables memorized by 2nd grade?
Does he just wither on a vine? If math were a sport he'd be an elite athlete. It would be like putting a teenager LeBron James on a rec team for basketball.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Group work doesn't automatically mean making kids "responsible" for other kids' comprehension or tying grades to other members... You drew that conclusion yourself.
I didn't draw any conclusions. I noted that the Riverside study, which is being used as a citation for how well detracking has worked in the past, made kids responsible for other kids' comprehension. It doesn't mean that VDOE will do the same, but they are heavily pushing group work as a model, and they're also heavily relying upon studies like the Riverside one to justify their view that detracking will benefit all students.
This was the quote from the article.
From the first link:
“ A major part of the equitable results attained at Railside was the serious way in which teachers expected
students to be responsible for each other’s learning. Many schools employ group work which, by its nature, brings with it an element of interdependence, but Railside teachers went beyond this to ensure that students took their responsibility to each other very seriously. One way in which teachers nurtured a feeling of responsibility was through the assessment system. For example, teachers occasionally graded the work of a group by rating the quality of the conversations groups had. In addition, the teachers occasionally gave group tests, which took several formats. In one version, students worked through a test together, but the teachers graded only one of the individual papers and that grade stood as the grade for all the students in the group. A third way in which responsibility was encouraged was through the practice of asking one student in a group to answer a follow-up question after a group had worked on something. If the student could not answer the question, the teacher would leave the group to further discussion before returning to ask the same student again. In the intervening time, it was the group’s responsibility to help the student learn the mathematics they needed to answer the question.”
Anonymous wrote:
From the first link:
“ A major part of the equitable results attained at Railside was the serious way in which teachers expected
students to be responsible for each other’s learning. Many schools employ group work which, by its nature, brings with it an element of interdependence, but Railside teachers went beyond this to ensure that students took their responsibility to each other very seriously. One way in which teachers nurtured a feeling of responsibility was through the assessment system. For example, teachers occasionally graded the work of a group by rating the quality of the conversations groups had. In addition, the teachers occasionally gave group tests, which took several formats. In one version, students worked through a test together, but the teachers graded only one of the individual papers and that grade stood as the grade for all the students in the group. A third way in which responsibility was encouraged was through the practice of asking one student in a group to answer a follow-up question after a group had worked on something. If the student could not answer the question, the teacher would leave the group to further discussion before returning to ask the same student again. In the intervening time, it was the group’s responsibility to help the student learn the mathematics they needed to answer the question.”