Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:And just for giggles, here's one for someone looking for a cheap investment property and the quintessential DC landlord experience. "Current tenants do not have lease and do not pay any rent."
https://www.redfin.com/DC/Washington/1032-6th-St-NE-20002/unit-201/home/9896497
Oh, my. I wonder what's going on here. Did a landlord decide to say screw it, he can't evict tenants who have no lease and aren't paying rent, so he'll just try to sell the unit?
I'm really curious what the inside is like: the combination of 3 BRs and 785 sqft sounds...well, slum-like. But if someone could stand to live in that space for a year, they could probably evict the tenants (post-COVID) if the new buyer plans to live in the unit. And the tenants aren't old enough to basically be unevictable.
It'll be really interesting to see how fast that one goes!
Anonymous wrote:Another Kingman Park, zoned for Maury, and a rare opportunity to do you own renovations without destroying the original details, 3br/1ba for $650k:
https://www.redfin.com/DC/Washington/1521-D-St-NE-20002/home/10115675
Anonymous wrote:And just for giggles, here's one for someone looking for a cheap investment property and the quintessential DC landlord experience. "Current tenants do not have lease and do not pay any rent."
https://www.redfin.com/DC/Washington/1032-6th-St-NE-20002/unit-201/home/9896497
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Oh wow the interior of the Florida Ave house is my ideal -- well preserved Wardman with original woodwork intact. That location is tough, though. I don't think I'd want to live right on Florida Ave. I think this close to the corner where that cyclist was killed last year, too. Though I think I heard they are going to streetscape Florida Avenue at some point, like they are doing with Maryland now?
I didn't even open the listing page for this one because it's on Florida, but I agree—that interior is great. I love that they didn't muck with the woodwork.
Those are tiny rooms though. Calling it a 3BR is a stretch when one of them is 6x9.5. That would work as a nursery or maybe a very small office, but that's about it.
Still, that's a great-looking house. I wonder if it will go quickly, and for how much.
PP here. I don’t mind the small 3rd bedroom at that price. And the basement needs work but you could easily add a spare bed down there. But I do expect this one to sit for a bit. Right on Florida plus the exterior isn’t great. It’s priced well though. I would expect it to go for asking.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Oh wow the interior of the Florida Ave house is my ideal -- well preserved Wardman with original woodwork intact. That location is tough, though. I don't think I'd want to live right on Florida Ave. I think this close to the corner where that cyclist was killed last year, too. Though I think I heard they are going to streetscape Florida Avenue at some point, like they are doing with Maryland now?
I didn't even open the listing page for this one because it's on Florida, but I agree—that interior is great. I love that they didn't muck with the woodwork.
Those are tiny rooms though. Calling it a 3BR is a stretch when one of them is 6x9.5. That would work as a nursery or maybe a very small office, but that's about it.
Still, that's a great-looking house. I wonder if it will go quickly, and for how much.
Anonymous wrote:Oh wow the interior of the Florida Ave house is my ideal -- well preserved Wardman with original woodwork intact. That location is tough, though. I don't think I'd want to live right on Florida Ave. I think this close to the corner where that cyclist was killed last year, too. Though I think I heard they are going to streetscape Florida Avenue at some point, like they are doing with Maryland now?
Anonymous wrote:It's gorgeous outside today, get out there and enjoy these open houses. Let us know what you think if you tour any of these properties:
$685,900
2br/1.5ba
840 Sq. Ft.
https://www.redfin.com/DC/Washington/1617-Potomac-Ave-SE-20003/home/9920853
$699,950
2br/1ba
970 Sq. Ft.
https://www.redfin.com/DC/Washington/1420-S-Carolina-Ave-SE-20003/home/9917569
$765,000
3br/2ba
1,632 Sq. Ft
https://www.redfin.com/DC/Washington/1214-Florida-Ave-NE-20002/home/10097075
$799,900
3br/3.5ba
1,720 Sq. Ft.
https://www.redfin.com/DC/Washington/1312-I-St-NE-20002/home/9912385
$800,000
4br/2.5ba
1,410 Sq. Ft.
https://www.redfin.com/DC/Washington/1029-6th-St-NE-20002/home/9898244
$850,000
4br/2.5ba
1,766 Sq. Ft.
https://www.redfin.com/DC/Washington/536-13th-St-SE-20003/home/9915083
$949,950
3br/2ba
1,514 Sq. Ft.
https://www.redfin.com/DC/Washington/726-6th-St-NE-20002/home/9896671
Anonymous wrote:It's gorgeous outside today, get out there and enjoy these open houses. Let us know what you think if you tour any of these properties:
$685,900
2br/1.5ba
840 Sq. Ft.
https://www.redfin.com/DC/Washington/1617-Potomac-Ave-SE-20003/home/9920853
$699,950
2br/1ba
970 Sq. Ft.
https://www.redfin.com/DC/Washington/1420-S-Carolina-Ave-SE-20003/home/9917569
$765,000
3br/2ba
1,632 Sq. Ft
https://www.redfin.com/DC/Washington/1214-Florida-Ave-NE-20002/home/10097075
$799,900
3br/3.5ba
1,720 Sq. Ft.
https://www.redfin.com/DC/Washington/1312-I-St-NE-20002/home/9912385
$800,000
4br/2.5ba
1,410 Sq. Ft.
https://www.redfin.com/DC/Washington/1029-6th-St-NE-20002/home/9898244
$850,000
4br/2.5ba
1,766 Sq. Ft.
https://www.redfin.com/DC/Washington/536-13th-St-SE-20003/home/9915083
$949,950
3br/2ba
1,514 Sq. Ft.
https://www.redfin.com/DC/Washington/726-6th-St-NE-20002/home/9896671
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:mAnonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:3br/2ba for $830k on a cute half-block street near Lincoln Park:
https://www.redfin.com/DC/Washington/1225-Walter-St-SE-20003/home/9911690
I like this one! Lots of outdoor space and that location is terrific. I’ve heard good things about Payne, too.
Layout is a little weird but I kind of like it. The kitchen is really nice and I don’t mind the weird location of the dining room.
It isn’t staged so I’m guessing current owners just don’t have kids. But it feels like a good time to show a house with two home offices![]()
I think this will go for over asking.
Does anyone know how to find out how wide this place is? It seems really narrow to me.
Most likely it’s 12’ wide. Maybe 14-16’, but 12’ is standard for this style in this neighborhood.
yep. we have one of the narrower row houses, and it’s 11 ft.
Just measured my townhouse after reading this because I didn't even realize there were variations. What's average for a Capitol Hill rowhouse? Mine is 17 ft (on the inside from wall to wall). . . . . which seems on the wider side. Are different styles different widths (Victorian, federal, etc.)? Any info/articles on this would be useful!
I am curious too! I see houses that look like they have exactly the same plan as ours, but ours is the only one on the block. I’m not sure if people built houses one by one or in groups. Ours is at the end of the block so it seems like it may have just been squeezed into some available space. The Victorians seem to be the narrowest.
Houses were generally built in rows, several at a time. Think of it as the cookie cutter suburban development of the Victorian era. The Capitol Hill Restoration Society has some interesting guides on the history of the neighborhood. Here's one on building styles: https://chrs.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/04_CHRS_BldgStyles.pdf
You can also find hints about house histories in the architects and ward guides on the DC Office of Planning website: https://planning.dc.gov/page/dc-history
Anonymous wrote:This property on H St corridor area was sold for $1,265,000 in APR 2018 and now pending under 10 days while listed for $1,395,000 wow wow https://www.redfin.com/DC/Washington/1241-G-St-NE-20002/home/9910096?utm_source=myredfin&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=instant_listings_update&riftinfo=ZXY9ZW1haWwmbD0xMzAxMTIwOSZwPWxpc3RpbmdfdXBkYXRlc19pbnN0YW50XzE1JmE9Y2xpY2smcz1mYXZvcml0ZXMmdD1hZGRyZXNzJmVtYWlsX2lkPTEzMDExMjA5XzE2MDA2MDgyMzVfMiZ1cGRhdGVfdHlwZT00Jmxpc3RpbmdfaWQ9MTI0NTg1MjU3JnByb3BlcnR5X2lkPTk5MTAwOTYmcG9zaXRpb25fbnVtYmVyPTA=
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:mAnonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:3br/2ba for $830k on a cute half-block street near Lincoln Park:
https://www.redfin.com/DC/Washington/1225-Walter-St-SE-20003/home/9911690
I like this one! Lots of outdoor space and that location is terrific. I’ve heard good things about Payne, too.
Layout is a little weird but I kind of like it. The kitchen is really nice and I don’t mind the weird location of the dining room.
It isn’t staged so I’m guessing current owners just don’t have kids. But it feels like a good time to show a house with two home offices![]()
I think this will go for over asking.
Does anyone know how to find out how wide this place is? It seems really narrow to me.
Most likely it’s 12’ wide. Maybe 14-16’, but 12’ is standard for this style in this neighborhood.
yep. we have one of the narrower row houses, and it’s 11 ft.
Just measured my townhouse after reading this because I didn't even realize there were variations. What's average for a Capitol Hill rowhouse? Mine is 17 ft (on the inside from wall to wall). . . . . which seems on the wider side. Are different styles different widths (Victorian, federal, etc.)? Any info/articles on this would be useful!
I am curious too! I see houses that look like they have exactly the same plan as ours, but ours is the only one on the block. I’m not sure if people built houses one by one or in groups. Ours is at the end of the block so it seems like it may have just been squeezed into some available space. The Victorians seem to be the narrowest.
You will definitely see some variation by style, as.well as within blocks because they were trying to fit the available length of the street. The width is measured on the survey plat from the middle of the adjoining walls, so the interior width will always be a little less. The 1910s and 1920s Wardman-style houses that were built later tend to be a bit wider on average, but those tend to be a bit newer than most houses on the Hill (many are near H Street, Columbia Heights, Mt. Pleasant, and Petworth). 19-20 feet is pretty common in that era, which would previously only be found in the largest Victorians. Once you get into the '30s and '40s, attached houses tend to get a little narrower again (and the ceilings lower), probably because upper middle income buyers started moving to detached-home neighborhoods in Upper NW and NE.
This is great info and very cool. Is there a good source you have found to read up on architecture in the neighborhood? I'm in one of the Wardmans.