Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Er, just how old (young) are people on here that they think 70 is old??
My local yoga center is filled with 70s standing on their heads and doing shoulder-stand.
I am late 50s with 3 teenagers. My parents are in their 80s and until a month ago went to the gym everyday.
There is a large number 70+ in my masters swimming group.
70s folks are yesterday's hippies! They fought hard to get that weed legalized for you.
Avg life expectancy for someone born in 1950s is 70-72 yrs. Avg life expectancy for those those today is late 70s-80- in non covid times. Awesome if you make it past that and are trying to keep healthy and go to the gym, etc., but the country should not have to come to screeching halt to keep people already at the end of their life alive a little bit longer. That is not “for the greater good”
Anonymous wrote:Er, just how old (young) are people on here that they think 70 is old??
My local yoga center is filled with 70s standing on their heads and doing shoulder-stand.
I am late 50s with 3 teenagers. My parents are in their 80s and until a month ago went to the gym everyday.
There is a large number 70+ in my masters swimming group.
70s folks are yesterday's hippies! They fought hard to get that weed legalized for you.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Er, just how old (young) are people on here that they think 70 is old??
My local yoga center is filled with 70s standing on their heads and doing shoulder-stand.
I am late 50s with 3 teenagers. My parents are in their 80s and until a month ago went to the gym everyday.
There is a large number 70+ in my masters swimming group.
70s folks are yesterday's hippies! They fought hard to get that weed legalized for you.
If they're old and healthy, they will be fine. If they have substantial health problems then they need to quarantine themselves.
Most COVID-19 infections among the elderly are not lethal.
Sure. In MD there are about 2,000 cases among those in their 70s and 250 deaths.
So 1750 of 2000, that is most.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Er, just how old (young) are people on here that they think 70 is old??
My local yoga center is filled with 70s standing on their heads and doing shoulder-stand.
I am late 50s with 3 teenagers. My parents are in their 80s and until a month ago went to the gym everyday.
There is a large number 70+ in my masters swimming group.
70s folks are yesterday's hippies! They fought hard to get that weed legalized for you.
If they're old and healthy, they will be fine. If they have substantial health problems then they need to quarantine themselves.
Most COVID-19 infections among the elderly are not lethal.
Sure. In MD there are about 2,000 cases among those in their 70s and 250 deaths.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Er, just how old (young) are people on here that they think 70 is old??
My local yoga center is filled with 70s standing on their heads and doing shoulder-stand.
I am late 50s with 3 teenagers. My parents are in their 80s and until a month ago went to the gym everyday.
There is a large number 70+ in my masters swimming group.
70s folks are yesterday's hippies! They fought hard to get that weed legalized for you.
If they're old and healthy, they will be fine. If they have substantial health problems then they need to quarantine themselves.
Most COVID-19 infections among the elderly are not lethal.
Anonymous wrote:Er, just how old (young) are people on here that they think 70 is old??
My local yoga center is filled with 70s standing on their heads and doing shoulder-stand.
I am late 50s with 3 teenagers. My parents are in their 80s and until a month ago went to the gym everyday.
There is a large number 70+ in my masters swimming group.
70s folks are yesterday's hippies! They fought hard to get that weed legalized for you.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Except it IS community spread, and workers there can and do spread the infection outside of their workplace and into the community, including hospitals, other nursing homes, group homes, and prisons... all places with people highly likely to catch it, and perhaps die from it.
No. It’s not. Treat nursing home workers totally differently. You can isolate them until this is over. We need a strong public health response to this. This is NOT the same as general community spread.
Anonymous wrote:Hogan keeps lowering the goals in an effort to reopen faster.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Except it IS community spread, and workers there can and do spread the infection outside of their workplace and into the community, including hospitals, other nursing homes, group homes, and prisons... all places with people highly likely to catch it, and perhaps die from it.
No. It’s not. Treat nursing home workers totally differently. You can isolate them until this is over. We need a strong public health response to this. This is NOT the same as general community spread.
Unless all the residents/workers of these nursing homes took recent vacations to Wuhan, it IS community spread. Members of the COMMUNITY SPREAD the virus to workers and patients.
I get that you are advocating for some plan that isolates these sub-communities to allow the rest of society to open up, and there may very well be a way to do that if you can actually test and measure the spread of the virus elsewhere, but you don't get to just redefine established words and phrases that have real meaning and implications. Unless there is some data that shows the spread in these nursing homes is all due to resident patient zeros, the fact is the rest of society brought the virus to the nursing homes, not the other way around. So even if you isolate them, that means the virus is still floating around the rest of us.
Hogan has already said he is not considering high occupancy living, like nursing homes, and I assume jails, as community spread for obvious reasons.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Except it IS community spread, and workers there can and do spread the infection outside of their workplace and into the community, including hospitals, other nursing homes, group homes, and prisons... all places with people highly likely to catch it, and perhaps die from it.
No. It’s not. Treat nursing home workers totally differently. You can isolate them until this is over. We need a strong public health response to this. This is NOT the same as general community spread.
Unless all the residents/workers of these nursing homes took recent vacations to Wuhan, it IS community spread. Members of the COMMUNITY SPREAD the virus to workers and patients.
I get that you are advocating for some plan that isolates these sub-communities to allow the rest of society to open up, and there may very well be a way to do that if you can actually test and measure the spread of the virus elsewhere, but you don't get to just redefine established words and phrases that have real meaning and implications. Unless there is some data that shows the spread in these nursing homes is all due to resident patient zeros, the fact is the rest of society brought the virus to the nursing homes, not the other way around. So even if you isolate them, that means the virus is still floating around the rest of us.
Hogan has already said he is not considering high occupancy living, like nursing homes, and I assume jails, as community spread for obvious reasons.
Oh that’s excellent! I hadn’t heard that.
It is in his blueprint for recovery, released last Friday.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Except it IS community spread, and workers there can and do spread the infection outside of their workplace and into the community, including hospitals, other nursing homes, group homes, and prisons... all places with people highly likely to catch it, and perhaps die from it.
No. It’s not. Treat nursing home workers totally differently. You can isolate them until this is over. We need a strong public health response to this. This is NOT the same as general community spread.
Unless all the residents/workers of these nursing homes took recent vacations to Wuhan, it IS community spread. Members of the COMMUNITY SPREAD the virus to workers and patients.
I get that you are advocating for some plan that isolates these sub-communities to allow the rest of society to open up, and there may very well be a way to do that if you can actually test and measure the spread of the virus elsewhere, but you don't get to just redefine established words and phrases that have real meaning and implications. Unless there is some data that shows the spread in these nursing homes is all due to resident patient zeros, the fact is the rest of society brought the virus to the nursing homes, not the other way around. So even if you isolate them, that means the virus is still floating around the rest of us.
Hogan has already said he is not considering high occupancy living, like nursing homes, and I assume jails, as community spread for obvious reasons.
Oh that’s excellent! I hadn’t heard that.
Anonymous wrote:Er, just how old (young) are people on here that they think 70 is old??
My local yoga center is filled with 70s standing on their heads and doing shoulder-stand.
I am late 50s with 3 teenagers. My parents are in their 80s and until a month ago went to the gym everyday.
There is a large number 70+ in my masters swimming group.
70s folks are yesterday's hippies! They fought hard to get that weed legalized for you.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Except it IS community spread, and workers there can and do spread the infection outside of their workplace and into the community, including hospitals, other nursing homes, group homes, and prisons... all places with people highly likely to catch it, and perhaps die from it.
No. It’s not. Treat nursing home workers totally differently. You can isolate them until this is over. We need a strong public health response to this. This is NOT the same as general community spread.
Unless all the residents/workers of these nursing homes took recent vacations to Wuhan, it IS community spread. Members of the COMMUNITY SPREAD the virus to workers and patients.
I get that you are advocating for some plan that isolates these sub-communities to allow the rest of society to open up, and there may very well be a way to do that if you can actually test and measure the spread of the virus elsewhere, but you don't get to just redefine established words and phrases that have real meaning and implications. Unless there is some data that shows the spread in these nursing homes is all due to resident patient zeros, the fact is the rest of society brought the virus to the nursing homes, not the other way around. So even if you isolate them, that means the virus is still floating around the rest of us.
Hogan has already said he is not considering high occupancy living, like nursing homes, and I assume jails, as community spread for obvious reasons.