Anonymous
Post 01/28/2020 01:23     Subject: It appears Bolton's book undercuts Trump's defense
Anonymous wrote:

Bush= Hitler, until he trashed Trump

Romney= evil white billionaire until he trashed Trump

McCain= evil war monger until he trashed Trump and brought the false dossier to DC. He then became America’s war hero patriot, after that move.

Bolton= war criminal liar, until: today.



That's exactly what terrifies us: that even the evil billionaires and warmongers and war criminals think Trump crosses the line.
Anonymous
Post 01/27/2020 23:19     Subject: It appears Bolton's book undercuts Trump's defense
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
I am curious as to how NYT got the entire book, when both House prosecutors and White House defense were unaware of its exact contents.




It's been sitting on Trump's desk since Dec. 30.

Someone in the White House leaked it.


Bolton team is accusing that WH made copies of it and circulated...


I love that there are moles in the WH.
Anonymous
Post 01/27/2020 23:13     Subject: It appears Bolton's book undercuts Trump's defense
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
I am curious as to how NYT got the entire book, when both House prosecutors and White House defense were unaware of its exact contents.




It's been sitting on Trump's desk since Dec. 30.

Someone in the White House leaked it.


Bolton team is accusing that WH made copies of it and circulated...
Anonymous
Post 01/27/2020 23:02     Subject: It appears Bolton's book undercuts Trump's defense
Anonymous wrote:
I am curious as to how NYT got the entire book, when both House prosecutors and White House defense were unaware of its exact contents.




It's been sitting on Trump's desk since Dec. 30.

Someone in the White House leaked it.
Anonymous
Post 01/27/2020 22:37     Subject: It appears Bolton's book undercuts Trump's defense
Anonymous wrote:Graham wants to see the manuscript!

https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/480205-graham-says-he-wants-to-see-bolton-manuscript



This is to avoid having him testify. Don't fall for it.
Anonymous
Post 01/27/2020 22:35     Subject: It appears Bolton's book undercuts Trump's defense
Graham wants to see the manuscript!

https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/480205-graham-says-he-wants-to-see-bolton-manuscript
Anonymous
Post 01/27/2020 22:09     Subject: It appears Bolton's book undercuts Trump's defense
Oh boy, sounds like Bolton took notes!!

Also another former official has suggested Bolton went home every night and was working on the book - how else could he have finished it so quickly?

https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/bolton-book-roils-washington-as-onetime-allies-turn-on-trumps-former-national-security-adviser/2020/01/27/f8ab83d8-4145-11ea-b503-2b077c436617_story.html
Anonymous
Post 01/27/2020 22:04     Subject: It appears Bolton's book undercuts Trump's defense
Anonymous wrote:the house had the right to subpoena Bolton, they chose not to. They did not want Bolton because Bolton had and has nothing to offer.

Except his book- which he’s getting tons of free advertising and publicity for right now.


you can't be serious. if they subpoenaed Bolton and it was held up in court until three months before the election, then you would scream they were playing politics. The Dems elected to not go the Comey route (or, more broady, the Chaffetz route as he was a key actor in orchestrating the big reveal. Guessing that you had no problems with any of that.

Alas, Comey's large ego probably effectively blunts any conscience he should have on getting the nation into this mess.
Anonymous
Post 01/27/2020 22:03     Subject: It appears Bolton's book undercuts Trump's defense

I am curious as to how NYT got the entire book, when both House prosecutors and White House defense were unaware of its exact contents.


Anonymous
Post 01/27/2020 21:37     Subject: It appears Bolton's book undercuts Trump's defense
Apparently Bolton expressed concerns to Barr about Trump's love of dictators and fear that he was granting them favors.

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/01/27/us/politics/john-bolton-trump-book-barr.html?smid=tw-nytimes&smtyp=cur

John R. Bolton, the former national security adviser, privately told Attorney General William P. Barr last year that he had concerns that President Trump was effectively granting personal favors to the autocratic leaders of Turkey and China, according to an unpublished manuscript by Mr. Bolton.

Mr. Barr responded by pointing to a pair of Justice Department investigations of companies in those countries and said he was worried that Mr. Trump had created the appearance that he had undue influence over what would typically be independent inquiries, according to the manuscript. Backing up his point, Mr. Barr mentioned conversations Mr. Trump had with the leaders, President Recep Tayyip Erdogan of Turkey and President Xi Jinping of China.

Mr. Bolton’s account underscores the fact that the unease about Mr. Trump’s seeming embrace of authoritarian leaders, long expressed by experts and his opponents, also existed among some of the senior cabinet officers entrusted by the president to carry out his foreign policy and national security agendas.
Anonymous
Post 01/27/2020 19:25     Subject: It appears Bolton's book undercuts Trump's defense
Anonymous wrote:the house had the right to subpoena Bolton, they chose not to. They did not want Bolton because Bolton had and has nothing to offer.

Except his book- which he’s getting tons of free advertising and publicity for right now.


And which directly contradicts Trump's defense.

Do you think it's fiction? Or simply the truth, which must continue to be swept under the rug.
Anonymous
Post 01/27/2020 19:10     Subject: It appears Bolton's book undercuts Trump's defense
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:the house had the right to subpoena Bolton, they chose not to. They did not want Bolton because Bolton had and has nothing to offer.

Except his book- which he’s getting tons of free advertising and publicity for right now.


Oh no. They wanted Bolten but he said that they were going to have to subpoena him and go to court. They weren’t willing to go to court. It was going to take too long.

this has been stated repeatedly, but Trumpsters ignore it. Don't waste your breath.

"If you can't argue the facts, attack the process" -- signed from some R person who stated this about Trump.
Anonymous
Post 01/27/2020 18:59     Subject: It appears Bolton's book undercuts Trump's defense
Anonymous wrote:the house had the right to subpoena Bolton, they chose not to. They did not want Bolton because Bolton had and has nothing to offer.

Except his book- which he’s getting tons of free advertising and publicity for right now.


Oh no. They wanted Bolten but he said that they were going to have to subpoena him and go to court. They weren’t willing to go to court. It was going to take too long.
Anonymous
Post 01/27/2020 18:57     Subject: Re:It appears Bolton's book undercuts Trump's defense
Donate for the Billborad to display Bolton's news in front of Senate: https://secure.actblue.com/donate/boltontruck?refcode=confirmed&amount=20.20
Anonymous
Post 01/27/2020 17:58     Subject: It appears Bolton's book undercuts Trump's defense
the house had the right to subpoena Bolton, they chose not to. They did not want Bolton because Bolton had and has nothing to offer.

Except his book- which he’s getting tons of free advertising and publicity for right now.