Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The guttenberg printing press was invented in 1420. By the 1500, printing shops were everywhere in major cities in Europe. Rather than spread tolerance and ideas it sparked the Protestant reformation which led to 150-200 years of bloody religious warfare, balkanization of the Holy Roman Empire and sectarian extremism. Death tolls ran around 6-15 million which was approximately 10-25% of the entire European population at the time, countries like Germany lost 35-40% of its entire population.

Darpanet was invented in 1983. By 2010, the internet was ubiquitous around the world. By 2020 it is leading to increasing popularization and violence. Tensions are flaring up in everywhere from France to Chile to Britain to Hong Kong to Virginia, The world is full of tinder and waiting for a spark. Based on historical analogy, We will likely face incredible violence and chaos for the reminder of our lives. Virginia may be the first spark of the conflagration to come. Is your bunker in New Zealand ready?

Wow. Speaking of off the rocker...

You guys are hungry for a civil war. Scary.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Martin Luther King Jr was killed with a gun.

Why hold a pro-gun rally *on* MLK Day?

Instead of reflecting on his great work and words we will be worried about more gun violence. It’s disrespectful at a minimum. It’s blatant hate & racism at worst.

Disgusting.

Lol is this your first time hearing about lobby day? I know you hate rights, so I guess we can add the right to assembly to your list of evil.

Holding a pro-gun rally on MLK Day is disgusting. That’s probably a bigger draw to the white supremacists than the gun rights. Have fun with your very fine friends.

Anonymous wrote:The guttenberg printing press was invented in 1420. By the 1500, printing shops were everywhere in major cities in Europe. Rather than spread tolerance and ideas it sparked the Protestant reformation which led to 150-200 years of bloody religious warfare, balkanization of the Holy Roman Empire and sectarian extremism. Death tolls ran around 6-15 million which was approximately 10-25% of the entire European population at the time, countries like Germany lost 35-40% of its entire population.

Darpanet was invented in 1983. By 2010, the internet was ubiquitous around the world. By 2020 it is leading to increasing popularization and violence. Tensions are flaring up in everywhere from France to Chile to Britain to Hong Kong to Virginia, The world is full of tinder and waiting for a spark. Based on historical analogy, We will likely face incredible violence and chaos for the reminder of our lives. Virginia may be the first spark of the conflagration to come. Is your bunker in New Zealand ready?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You sound absolutely crazy. Like full-tilt nuts.

I mean, I don't want you to stop posting, because it's fascinating, the stuff you come up with. Like, if I weren't reading it, I wouldn't believe it if someone told me second hand.


In fact, I suspect you're actually a pro-gun troll, saying crazy, insane, outlandish stuff like this to make antigunners look bad. But I can't say for sure, because there actually are antigunners out there as crazy as you sound. But I have a hunch you're a troll.

+1
This person has been posting compulsively for several days. I'm a psychiatrist and can tell you that she is off her rocker. Let's leave her alone, guys.

Anonymous wrote:You sound absolutely crazy. Like full-tilt nuts.

I mean, I don't want you to stop posting, because it's fascinating, the stuff you come up with. Like, if I weren't reading it, I wouldn't believe it if someone told me second hand.


In fact, I suspect you're actually a pro-gun troll, saying crazy, insane, outlandish stuff like this to make antigunners look bad. But I can't say for sure, because there actually are antigunners out there as crazy as you sound. But I have a hunch you're a troll.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

OK. And?

I'm not pushing to ban all AR-15s - just some components.

Yeah? What components, exactly?

The Lower? The FCG? The Upper? The buffer tube? The BCG?

Which components, exactly? Do tell!

What I find telling about the ignorance of the gun-grabbers is that they consider a bayonet mount as one of the "evil features" that defines a so-called assault weapon. An M1 carbine without a bayonet lug would be legal under the terms of their proposed assault weapon law. The same gun with a bayonet lug would be considered an assault weapon, and would be illegal.

What I'm wondering is this: What is it about a bayonet lug that makes a gun with that feature so dangerous? How many people in the entire USA have been bayonetted to death in the past 150 years? I would bet that the answer is NONE. But that doesn't stop the gun-grabbers. They'll use any excuse they can to make life difficult for law-abiding gun owners and to grab as many guns as they can.

Why do you feel the need to "grab as many guns as you can"?

How many guns do you own?
How many guns do/did your parents own?
How many guns do/did your grandparents own?

Because they are elitists who are afraid of the deplorable (veterans, blue collar, minorities) being armed.

No, we are afraid of these legends in their own mind who are trigger happy and afraid of their own shadow. Every rabid gun enthusiast is, at heart, a coward with poor judgment. They shouldn’t be allowed to own guns.

What makes them a coward? Wanting to protect ones family is the opposite of cowardice.

Perhaps you feel their fears are unfounded, but that doesn't make them a coward.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

OK. And?

I'm not pushing to ban all AR-15s - just some components.

Yeah? What components, exactly?

The Lower? The FCG? The Upper? The buffer tube? The BCG?

Which components, exactly? Do tell!

What I find telling about the ignorance of the gun-grabbers is that they consider a bayonet mount as one of the "evil features" that defines a so-called assault weapon. An M1 carbine without a bayonet lug would be legal under the terms of their proposed assault weapon law. The same gun with a bayonet lug would be considered an assault weapon, and would be illegal.

What I'm wondering is this: What is it about a bayonet lug that makes a gun with that feature so dangerous? How many people in the entire USA have been bayonetted to death in the past 150 years? I would bet that the answer is NONE. But that doesn't stop the gun-grabbers. They'll use any excuse they can to make life difficult for law-abiding gun owners and to grab as many guns as they can.

Why do you feel the need to "grab as many guns as you can"?

How many guns do you own?
How many guns do/did your parents own?
How many guns do/did your grandparents own?

Because they are elitists who are afraid of the deplorable (veterans, blue collar, minorities) being armed.

No, we are afraid of these legends in their own mind who are trigger happy and afraid of their own shadow. Every rabid gun enthusiast is, at heart, a coward with poor judgment. They shouldn’t be allowed to own guns.

What makes them a coward? Wanting to protect ones family is the opposite of cowardice.

Perhaps you feel their fears are unfounded, but that doesn't make them a coward.

sure it does. The cowardice is being afraid of their own shadow. Protect them from WHAT? They see boogeymen behind every corner. BLACK boogeymen!

People are generally poor at assessing actual risk. Conservatives in general tend to be less smart and more fearful. It really doesn’t make much sense to allow them have guns because they will just end up hurting someone (as incidents daily prove).

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Martin Luther King Jr was killed with a gun.

Why hold a pro-gun rally *on* MLK Day?

Instead of reflecting on his great work and words we will be worried about more gun violence. It’s disrespectful at a minimum. It’s blatant hate & racism at worst.

Disgusting.

Lol is this your first time hearing about lobby day? I know you hate rights, so I guess we can add the right to assembly to your list of evil.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

OK. And?

I'm not pushing to ban all AR-15s - just some components.

Yeah? What components, exactly?

The Lower? The FCG? The Upper? The buffer tube? The BCG?

Which components, exactly? Do tell!

What I find telling about the ignorance of the gun-grabbers is that they consider a bayonet mount as one of the "evil features" that defines a so-called assault weapon. An M1 carbine without a bayonet lug would be legal under the terms of their proposed assault weapon law. The same gun with a bayonet lug would be considered an assault weapon, and would be illegal.

What I'm wondering is this: What is it about a bayonet lug that makes a gun with that feature so dangerous? How many people in the entire USA have been bayonetted to death in the past 150 years? I would bet that the answer is NONE. But that doesn't stop the gun-grabbers. They'll use any excuse they can to make life difficult for law-abiding gun owners and to grab as many guns as they can.

Why do you feel the need to "grab as many guns as you can"?

How many guns do you own?
How many guns do/did your parents own?
How many guns do/did your grandparents own?

Because they are elitists who are afraid of the deplorable (veterans, blue collar, minorities) being armed.

No, we are afraid of these legends in their own mind who are trigger happy and afraid of their own shadow. Every rabid gun enthusiast is, at heart, a coward with poor judgment. They shouldn’t be allowed to own guns.

What makes them a coward? Wanting to protect ones family is the opposite of cowardice.

Perhaps you feel their fears are unfounded, but that doesn't make them a coward.

sure it does. The cowardice is being afraid of their own shadow. Protect them from WHAT? They see boogeymen behind every corner. BLACK boogeymen!

People are generally poor at assessing actual risk. Conservatives in general tend to be less smart and more fearful. It really doesn’t make much sense to allow them have guns because they will just end up hurting someone (as incidents daily prove).

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

OK. And?

I'm not pushing to ban all AR-15s - just some components.

Yeah? What components, exactly?

The Lower? The FCG? The Upper? The buffer tube? The BCG?

Which components, exactly? Do tell!

What I find telling about the ignorance of the gun-grabbers is that they consider a bayonet mount as one of the "evil features" that defines a so-called assault weapon. An M1 carbine without a bayonet lug would be legal under the terms of their proposed assault weapon law. The same gun with a bayonet lug would be considered an assault weapon, and would be illegal.

What I'm wondering is this: What is it about a bayonet lug that makes a gun with that feature so dangerous? How many people in the entire USA have been bayonetted to death in the past 150 years? I would bet that the answer is NONE. But that doesn't stop the gun-grabbers. They'll use any excuse they can to make life difficult for law-abiding gun owners and to grab as many guns as they can.

Why do you feel the need to "grab as many guns as you can"?

How many guns do you own?
How many guns do/did your parents own?
How many guns do/did your grandparents own?

Because they are elitists who are afraid of the deplorable (veterans, blue collar, minorities) being armed.

No, we are afraid of these legends in their own mind who are trigger happy and afraid of their own shadow. Every rabid gun enthusiast is, at heart, a coward with poor judgment. They shouldn’t be allowed to own guns.

What makes them a coward? Wanting to protect ones family is the opposite of cowardice.

Perhaps you feel their fears are unfounded, but that doesn't make them a coward.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

OK. And?

I'm not pushing to ban all AR-15s - just some components.

Yeah? What components, exactly?

The Lower? The FCG? The Upper? The buffer tube? The BCG?

Which components, exactly? Do tell!

What I find telling about the ignorance of the gun-grabbers is that they consider a bayonet mount as one of the "evil features" that defines a so-called assault weapon. An M1 carbine without a bayonet lug would be legal under the terms of their proposed assault weapon law. The same gun with a bayonet lug would be considered an assault weapon, and would be illegal.

What I'm wondering is this: What is it about a bayonet lug that makes a gun with that feature so dangerous? How many people in the entire USA have been bayonetted to death in the past 150 years? I would bet that the answer is NONE. But that doesn't stop the gun-grabbers. They'll use any excuse they can to make life difficult for law-abiding gun owners and to grab as many guns as they can.

Why do you feel the need to "grab as many guns as you can"?

How many guns do you own?
How many guns do/did your parents own?
How many guns do/did your grandparents own?

Because they are elitists who are afraid of the deplorable (veterans, blue collar, minorities) being armed.

No, we are afraid of these legends in their own mind who are trigger happy and afraid of their own shadow. Every rabid gun enthusiast is, at heart, a coward with poor judgment. They shouldn’t be allowed to own guns.

The minority comment is hilarious. The NRA and its members, and the GOP would crap their collective pants if African Americans joined en masse and started exercising open carry rights.