Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m a liberal woman who is NOT offended by the ad. Heck, I’m even a bit overweight. Here’s my take on the ad: she’s a working mom with a demanding job (just like me) and she and her husband have a high HHI. Her husband knows her friends have Pelotons and she wanted one...even though they have a gym membership and she’s done barre and yoga. But she explained that it would be so much more convenient to have the peloton in the house so she doesn’t need to leave the house and find a sitter since he’s always on work travel or golfing. He obviously doesn’t need the guilt or a fight, so he bought her the peloton. NBD because they can easily afford it.
I think the drama over the ad is ridiculous.
Why must everyone assign malicious intent? Why see evil in everything? Why create issues that don’t exist? So stupid.
I could see her sunken Bambi eyes of a woman with an eating disorder:
![]()
I would have preferred if they picked a slightly sturdier looking actress.
Yes! I'm the pp who said I think it has something to do with her look. Her eyes have this pleading "help me" look.
Huh.
I’m guessing they picked her specifically because she has dark features so they could check the diversity box (as opposed to using a blonde hair lady). Point being: there’s simply no way to please everyone.
What I said has nothing to do with her hair or eye color. It's her crazy eyed look
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:She is now in a gin ad
https://www.cnn.com/2019/12/07/us/peloton-ad-ryan-reynolds-gin-trnd/index.html
I thought this was a run on from the Peloton ad: the husband was such a jerk, she left him, and now has to drink with her girl pals to get her confidence back and know that she is "safe."
Anonymous wrote:She is now in a gin ad
https://www.cnn.com/2019/12/07/us/peloton-ad-ryan-reynolds-gin-trnd/index.html
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think one of their biggest problems with this as was casting. The actress has large, round eyes. And I think that's what gave off the negative "husband pleasing, anxious " vibe. I really think a less wide eyes actress would have made a difference
Sadly this is probably the most wise comment on the entire thread.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think one of their biggest problems with this as was casting. The actress has large, round eyes. And I think that's what gave off the negative "husband pleasing, anxious " vibe. I really think a less wide eyes actress would have made a difference
Sadly this is probably the most wise comment on the entire thread.
Pp here. And it sad. But that picture that a PP posted is exactly that sad wide eyed look.
Anonymous wrote:People are overreacting to the commercial. That woman is very thin but it seems like she doesn't workout much. Exercise is crucial to health even for thin people.
Btw, I am thin and love to workout. My husband just bought me a peloton for xmas (it was delivered early). I'm not offended and I don't think he is trying to tell me something.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think one of their biggest problems with this as was casting. The actress has large, round eyes. And I think that's what gave off the negative "husband pleasing, anxious " vibe. I really think a less wide eyes actress would have made a difference
Sadly this is probably the most wise comment on the entire thread.
Anonymous wrote:I think one of their biggest problems with this as was casting. The actress has large, round eyes. And I think that's what gave off the negative "husband pleasing, anxious " vibe. I really think a less wide eyes actress would have made a difference
Anonymous wrote:Does anyone know how the supposed uproar started? I think Peloton just created the fake controversy for publicity.
As of yesterday, they had hit their 52-week high. And I say 52-week. They've only been public since September. Today they are back down.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Does anyone know how the supposed uproar started? I think Peloton just created the fake controversy for publicity.
Well that person would be out of a job considering how much it's costed them!
I bet they increase their sales.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Does anyone know how the supposed uproar started? I think Peloton just created the fake controversy for publicity.
Well that person would be out of a job considering how much it's costed them!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m a liberal woman who is NOT offended by the ad. Heck, I’m even a bit overweight. Here’s my take on the ad: she’s a working mom with a demanding job (just like me) and she and her husband have a high HHI. Her husband knows her friends have Pelotons and she wanted one...even though they have a gym membership and she’s done barre and yoga. But she explained that it would be so much more convenient to have the peloton in the house so she doesn’t need to leave the house and find a sitter since he’s always on work travel or golfing. He obviously doesn’t need the guilt or a fight, so he bought her the peloton. NBD because they can easily afford it.
I think the drama over the ad is ridiculous.
Why must everyone assign malicious intent? Why see evil in everything? Why create issues that don’t exist? So stupid.
I could see her sunken Bambi eyes of a woman with an eating disorder:
![]()
I would have preferred if they picked a slightly sturdier looking actress.
Yes! I'm the pp who said I think it has something to do with her look. Her eyes have this pleading "help me" look.
Huh.
I’m guessing they picked her specifically because she has dark features so they could check the diversity box (as opposed to using a blonde hair lady). Point being: there’s simply no way to please everyone.