Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's not illegal to have an affair.
I do believe it's illegal to be a blatant partisan (in any direction) while also serving as a supposedly "impartial" FBI Director.![]()
Anonymous wrote:It's not illegal to have an affair.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The US DOJ says that evidence was *altered* by St. Louis FBI/DOJ employees in their review of Andy McCabe and Peter Strzok’s investigation of Mike Flynn.
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.dcd.191592/gov.uscourts.dcd.191592.259.0_4.pdf
This will get interesting.
Between this case, the mishandling of the Larry Nasser gymnast sexual abuses, the fact that FBI got advance warning of 1/6 and did absolutely nothing about it... FBI needs to do some serious house cleaning. They were already notoriously "Trumpland" during the Clinton campaign and only went more and more downhill after that.
+1
They’re really gross. That Nasser thing was absolutely the lowest of the low and just totally baffling. Why didn’t the FBI agent take the report seriously? I’m not ignorant of the fact that sexual assault is not taken seriously (here’s an example of a woman dying because the police didn’t take another woman’s
reported rape and attempted homicide seriously https://www.nytimes.com/2021/10/09/nyregion/khalil-wheeler-weaver-new-jersey.html), but I hold the FBI to a higher standard. Or I used to.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The US DOJ says that evidence was *altered* by St. Louis FBI/DOJ employees in their review of Andy McCabe and Peter Strzok’s investigation of Mike Flynn.
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.dcd.191592/gov.uscourts.dcd.191592.259.0_4.pdf
This will get interesting.
Between this case, the mishandling of the Larry Nasser gymnast sexual abuses, the fact that FBI got advance warning of 1/6 and did absolutely nothing about it... FBI needs to do some serious house cleaning. They were already notoriously "Trumpland" during the Clinton campaign and only went more and more downhill after that.
Anonymous wrote:The US DOJ says that evidence was *altered* by St. Louis FBI/DOJ employees in their review of Andy McCabe and Peter Strzok’s investigation of Mike Flynn.
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.dcd.191592/gov.uscourts.dcd.191592.259.0_4.pdf
This will get interesting.
Anonymous wrote:The US DOJ says that evidence was *altered* by St. Louis FBI/DOJ employees in their review of Andy McCabe and Peter Strzok’s investigation of Mike Flynn.
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.dcd.191592/gov.uscourts.dcd.191592.259.0_4.pdf
This will get interesting.
Anonymous wrote:So he didn’t lie to investigators?
Anonymous wrote:This isn’t a lack of candor issue. This is a termination due process issue. Trump and company violated his due process. Any employment law novice knew this would be the eventual outcome.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So he didn’t lie to investigators?
Yes. Yes, he did.
But, this is Biden's DOJ now. Lying doesn't seem to matter if you're on "the right side."
Can't say I expected a different outcome. When they refused to prosecute him, it opened the door for him to sue.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So he didn’t lie to investigators?
Yes. Yes, he did.
But, this is Biden's DOJ now. Lying doesn't seem to matter if you're on "the right side."
Can't say I expected a different outcome. When they refused to prosecute him, it opened the door for him to sue.
By “they” you mean the grand jury, right? That’s who refused to prosecute him. The DOJ certainly tried.