Anonymous wrote:Today's WP Metro Section talked about the rise of/non-prosecution of hate crimes in the District. Apparently there was a vicious attack on U street a while ago...charges against the adult dropped, and we will never know about the two minors (how their case was dispensed) due to DC's strong protection for minors under the Youth Justice Acts that provide them complete anonymity.

Not sure the Hilton thing was a hate crime. It was good old fashioned aggravated assault. The reason or motive is irrelevant. It was a violent crime and it needs to be prosecuted else they’ll do it again and others will be emboldened to do it as well.

Today's WP Metro Section talked about the rise of/non-prosecution of hate crimes in the District. Apparently there was a vicious attack on U street a while ago...charges against the adult dropped, and we will never know about the two minors (how their case was dispensed) due to DC's strong protection for minors under the Youth Justice Acts that provide them complete anonymity.

Anonymous wrote:Still no updates on the NAAHM noose incident deity there being video footage

This is NOT equivalent.

Any updates on the victim’s condition?

Still no updates on the NAAHM noose incident deity there being video footage

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:why have there only been 3 arrests?

Where do you see that?

An update would be welcome. I'd love to hear statements from our Mayor and Council as well.

Anonymous wrote:why have there only been 3 arrests?

Where do you see that?

why have there only been 3 arrests?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Black teens in DC lashing out at gays is nothing new.
If it has happened out in the boonies, the kids would have looked different.
Why is this confusing?

Because DC loonies can't acknowledge the obvious.

Now go and share what proportion of violent crime is committed by blacks in our city or our country and you will be banned from this site.

I think Breitbart still has a column "black crime" perhaps you should go there?

Humans should be evaluated based on their own actions, not based on groupings by race, religion etc.

That is indeed the liberal creed - but its a liberalism that used to be embraced by Ronald Reagan and George Bush. The broad sense of liberalism that includes classical liberalism.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Black teens in DC lashing out at gays is nothing new.
If it has happened out in the boonies, the kids would have looked different.
Why is this confusing?

Because DC loonies can't acknowledge the obvious.

Now go and share what proportion of violent crime is committed by blacks in our city or our country and you will be banned from this site.

50% of all homicides are committed by a demographic that constitutes 4% of the population.

This is true.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Black teens in DC lashing out at gays is nothing new.
If it has happened out in the boonies, the kids would have looked different.
Why is this confusing?

Because DC loonies can't acknowledge the obvious.

Now go and share what proportion of violent crime is committed by blacks in our city or our country and you will be banned from this site.

50% of all homicides are committed by a demographic that constitutes 4% of the population.

Brave soul...

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Black teens in DC lashing out at gays is nothing new.
If it has happened out in the boonies, the kids would have looked different.
Why is this confusing?

Because DC loonies can't acknowledge the obvious.

Now go and share what proportion of violent crime is committed by blacks in our city or our country and you will be banned from this site.

50% of all homicides are committed by a demographic that constitutes 4% of the population.

Anonymous wrote:Black teens in DC lashing out at gays is nothing new.
If it has happened out in the boonies, the kids would have looked different.
Why is this confusing?

Because DC loonies can't acknowledge the obvious.

Now go and share what proportion of violent crime is committed by blacks in our city or our country and you will be banned from this site.

Anonymous wrote:Black teens in DC lashing out at gays is nothing new.
If it has happened out in the boonies, the kids would have looked different.
Why is this confusing?

If the kids looked “different” (and clearly you meant “white”, since you think only white people live in the boonies), this would’ve been leading the 24/7 news cycle for weeks. But they weren’t different. They were black. So it barely got a mention.

Black teens in DC lashing out at gays is nothing new.
If it has happened out in the boonies, the kids would have looked different.
Why is this confusing?