Anonymous wrote:

Hmm I live in the slimmest state in USA and at 117 and 5’5 everyone calls me tiny here.

Hmm well nearly 20% of the population in your “slim” state is obese and an even larger percentage is overweight so being called “tiny” doesn’t hold much weight (ha!) given who you’re being compared to.

And what state do you live in that everyone is so stick skinny?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I keep seeing people on here mentioning that they've let themselves go because they wear casual clothing all the time as SAHMs.

Can someone give me an example of a person who is dressed up but casually and hasn't let themselves go?

What are you supposed to wear to the park if not jeans and a tee shirt?

I like how this person dresses. She mostly wears dresses and skirts but even when she's wearing jeans, she still wears jewelry and no tennis shoes.

https://www.instagram.com/p/BxJJU1BH50j/

https://www.instagram.com/p/BwsxM3LHikU/

https://www.instagram.com/p/BwIt9xtHlVW/

https://www.instagram.com/p/BvM7N6jno01/

It's funny you bring her up. She is always at the beach wearing uncomfortable sandals and a dress that looks like you'd lose your mind if you got any sand on it. It's a cute look but also seems like she's pretending to be an elderly Kennedy! (I like that look on her - elderly Kennedy cosplay - but I think for most people who get dirty or sandy or want to actually be able to go for a walk while they're out on vacation, it's not a very practical look.)

I think it must be exhausting to constantly curate your life for cute IG photos. Feels a bit suffocating and joyless.

Yeah - that's how it feels to me, too. I wonder what it is actually like if this is how you earn your living. I guess any job has its tedious and joyless moments.

NP here. There are a lot of naturally thin people commenting in this thread and feeling rightfully offended by the rude comments of others. But I think the reaction is coming from the fact that there are many many threads on DCUM in which disordered eating is praised and in which people seem to be obsessed with how tiny they could become.

Not to mention the many threads in which someone will mention feeling attractive at their average weight, and someone immediately chimes in with “you’re not that thin” or disputes that a PP at X height and weight could possibly wear a size 4 as they claim.

The large volume of comments like these create a difficult and skeptical environment on here for the naturally slim.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I keep seeing people on here mentioning that they've let themselves go because they wear casual clothing all the time as SAHMs.

Can someone give me an example of a person who is dressed up but casually and hasn't let themselves go?

What are you supposed to wear to the park if not jeans and a tee shirt?

I like how this person dresses. She mostly wears dresses and skirts but even when she's wearing jeans, she still wears jewelry and no tennis shoes.

https://www.instagram.com/p/BxJJU1BH50j/

https://www.instagram.com/p/BwsxM3LHikU/

https://www.instagram.com/p/BwIt9xtHlVW/

https://www.instagram.com/p/BvM7N6jno01/

It's funny you bring her up. She is always at the beach wearing uncomfortable sandals and a dress that looks like you'd lose your mind if you got any sand on it. It's a cute look but also seems like she's pretending to be an elderly Kennedy! (I like that look on her - elderly Kennedy cosplay - but I think for most people who get dirty or sandy or want to actually be able to go for a walk while they're out on vacation, it's not a very practical look.)

I think it must be exhausting to constantly curate your life for cute IG photos. Feels a bit suffocating and joyless.

Hmm I live in the slimmest state in USA and at 117 and 5’5 everyone calls me tiny here.

Hmm well nearly 20% of the population in your “slim” state is obese and an even larger percentage is overweight so being called “tiny” doesn’t hold much weight (ha!) given who you’re being compared to.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

5'2" and 110 lbs and I'm a fatass? OK! Not sure why you felt the need to be offensive but it's an anon board; please watch what you write/try not to give someone an eating disorder.

NP. I wouldn’t say you’re a “fatass” (such a vulgar term) but I’m 5’8” and 110 and I am slender but nowhere near emaciated. I can only imagine I would look a bit thick at this weight half a foot shorter.

Whoa - that's some really disordered thinking.

Right? In what world is someone who is 5'2 and 110 pounds "a bit thick"? I'm also 5''2 and 110. I wear a size 0 and am routinely told how "tiny" I am.

Pp who is 5'8 and 110, I am quite certain you look like skeletor and people you know speculate that you probably have an eating disorder.

There are naturally slender people. It is unkind to call someone skeletal .

5'2 and 110 pounds is "slender." The Pp who is 5'8 and 110 is not only rude but probably looks like she is ill.

Agreed. 5’6” and slim here. To the anorexic morons here, proudly posting grossly underweight stats: you wear your mental illness like a badge of honor. Don’t f-ck up your daughters (too late, probably) and get some goddamned therapy.

This is what I am talking about. I was naturally really thin until I hit my forties, 5'11" and 120 to 125 in my 20s which is an average of 17 BMI. I ate healthfully, did not overeat but ate what I wanted. I have a very small build and was naturally thin. I was not a moron and did not need therapy. I am now 165, not at all fat but feel I could lose 10 lbs.

It was people like you that made me feel ugly.

+1 Thanks for accusing me of mental illness. I eat more than most women I know. This is just my body. Good to know you're judging, tho.

Pp you clearly started the judgement. I'm 5'4 and about 115. Everyone I know calls me tiny. You do sound sick.

You’re tiny in America, especially flyover country. You aren’t tiny in a wealthy part of the US.

Hmm I live in the slimmest state in USA and at 117 and 5’5 everyone calls me tiny here.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

5'2" and 110 lbs and I'm a fatass? OK! Not sure why you felt the need to be offensive but it's an anon board; please watch what you write/try not to give someone an eating disorder.

NP. I wouldn’t say you’re a “fatass” (such a vulgar term) but I’m 5’8” and 110 and I am slender but nowhere near emaciated. I can only imagine I would look a bit thick at this weight half a foot shorter.

Whoa - that's some really disordered thinking.

Right? In what world is someone who is 5'2 and 110 pounds "a bit thick"? I'm also 5''2 and 110. I wear a size 0 and am routinely told how "tiny" I am.

Pp who is 5'8 and 110, I am quite certain you look like skeletor and people you know speculate that you probably have an eating disorder.

There are naturally slender people. It is unkind to call someone skeletal .

5'2 and 110 pounds is "slender." The Pp who is 5'8 and 110 is not only rude but probably looks like she is ill.

Agreed. 5’6” and slim here. To the anorexic morons here, proudly posting grossly underweight stats: you wear your mental illness like a badge of honor. Don’t f-ck up your daughters (too late, probably) and get some goddamned therapy.

This is what I am talking about. I was naturally really thin until I hit my forties, 5'11" and 120 to 125 in my 20s which is an average of 17 BMI. I ate healthfully, did not overeat but ate what I wanted. I have a very small build and was naturally thin. I was not a moron and did not need therapy. I am now 165, not at all fat but feel I could lose 10 lbs.

It was people like you that made me feel ugly.

+1 Thanks for accusing me of mental illness. I eat more than most women I know. This is just my body. Good to know you're judging, tho.

Pp you clearly started the judgement. I'm 5'4 and about 115. Everyone I know calls me tiny. You do sound sick.

You’re tiny in America, especially flyover country. You aren’t tiny in a wealthy part of the US.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

5'2" and 110 lbs and I'm a fatass? OK! Not sure why you felt the need to be offensive but it's an anon board; please watch what you write/try not to give someone an eating disorder.

NP. I wouldn’t say you’re a “fatass” (such a vulgar term) but I’m 5’8” and 110 and I am slender but nowhere near emaciated. I can only imagine I would look a bit thick at this weight half a foot shorter.

Whoa - that's some really disordered thinking.

Right? In what world is someone who is 5'2 and 110 pounds "a bit thick"? I'm also 5''2 and 110. I wear a size 0 and am routinely told how "tiny" I am.

Pp who is 5'8 and 110, I am quite certain you look like skeletor and people you know speculate that you probably have an eating disorder.

There are naturally slender people. It is unkind to call someone skeletal .

5'2 and 110 pounds is "slender." The Pp who is 5'8 and 110 is not only rude but probably looks like she is ill.

Agreed. 5’6” and slim here. To the anorexic morons here, proudly posting grossly underweight stats: you wear your mental illness like a badge of honor. Don’t f-ck up your daughters (too late, probably) and get some goddamned therapy.

This is what I am talking about. I was naturally really thin until I hit my forties, 5'11" and 120 to 125 in my 20s which is an average of 17 BMI. I ate healthfully, did not overeat but ate what I wanted. I have a very small build and was naturally thin. I was not a moron and did not need therapy. I am now 165, not at all fat but feel I could lose 10 lbs.

It was people like you that made me feel ugly.

+1 Thanks for accusing me of mental illness. I eat more than most women I know. This is just my body. Good to know you're judging, tho.

Pp you clearly started the judgement. I'm 5'4 and about 115. Everyone I know calls me tiny. You do sound sick.

I'm 5'9'', 115lbs, and have been since college. I'm not sick, or anorexic, or anything else. It's just how I'm built. My whole family is built similarly - long, lean, and narrow. I may not have the "ideal" body type based on whatever completely constructed and subjective beauty standards there are out there, but my body is valid. Please stop with the body-shaming.

You’re the one who started the mud-slinging by calling someone the same weight but shorter than you “thick”, so stop with playing the victim.

???? You must be referring to a PP.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

5'2" and 110 lbs and I'm a fatass? OK! Not sure why you felt the need to be offensive but it's an anon board; please watch what you write/try not to give someone an eating disorder.

NP. I wouldn’t say you’re a “fatass” (such a vulgar term) but I’m 5’8” and 110 and I am slender but nowhere near emaciated. I can only imagine I would look a bit thick at this weight half a foot shorter.

Whoa - that's some really disordered thinking.

Right? In what world is someone who is 5'2 and 110 pounds "a bit thick"? I'm also 5''2 and 110. I wear a size 0 and am routinely told how "tiny" I am.

Pp who is 5'8 and 110, I am quite certain you look like skeletor and people you know speculate that you probably have an eating disorder.

There are naturally slender people. It is unkind to call someone skeletal .

5'2 and 110 pounds is "slender." The Pp who is 5'8 and 110 is not only rude but probably looks like she is ill.

Agreed. 5’6” and slim here. To the anorexic morons here, proudly posting grossly underweight stats: you wear your mental illness like a badge of honor. Don’t f-ck up your daughters (too late, probably) and get some goddamned therapy.

This is what I am talking about. I was naturally really thin until I hit my forties, 5'11" and 120 to 125 in my 20s which is an average of 17 BMI. I ate healthfully, did not overeat but ate what I wanted. I have a very small build and was naturally thin. I was not a moron and did not need therapy. I am now 165, not at all fat but feel I could lose 10 lbs.

It was people like you that made me feel ugly.

+1 Thanks for accusing me of mental illness. I eat more than most women I know. This is just my body. Good to know you're judging, tho.

Pp you clearly started the judgement. I'm 5'4 and about 115. Everyone I know calls me tiny. You do sound sick.

I'm 5'9'', 115lbs, and have been since college. I'm not sick, or anorexic, or anything else. It's just how I'm built. My whole family is built similarly - long, lean, and narrow. I may not have the "ideal" body type based on whatever completely constructed and subjective beauty standards there are out there, but my body is valid. Please stop with the body-shaming.

You’re the one who started the mud-slinging by calling someone the same weight but shorter than you “thick”, so stop with playing the victim.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

5'2" and 110 lbs and I'm a fatass? OK! Not sure why you felt the need to be offensive but it's an anon board; please watch what you write/try not to give someone an eating disorder.

NP. I wouldn’t say you’re a “fatass” (such a vulgar term) but I’m 5’8” and 110 and I am slender but nowhere near emaciated. I can only imagine I would look a bit thick at this weight half a foot shorter.

Whoa - that's some really disordered thinking.

Right? In what world is someone who is 5'2 and 110 pounds "a bit thick"? I'm also 5''2 and 110. I wear a size 0 and am routinely told how "tiny" I am.

Pp who is 5'8 and 110, I am quite certain you look like skeletor and people you know speculate that you probably have an eating disorder.

There are naturally slender people. It is unkind to call someone skeletal .

5'2 and 110 pounds is "slender." The Pp who is 5'8 and 110 is not only rude but probably looks like she is ill.

Agreed. 5’6” and slim here. To the anorexic morons here, proudly posting grossly underweight stats: you wear your mental illness like a badge of honor. Don’t f-ck up your daughters (too late, probably) and get some goddamned therapy.

This is what I am talking about. I was naturally really thin until I hit my forties, 5'11" and 120 to 125 in my 20s which is an average of 17 BMI. I ate healthfully, did not overeat but ate what I wanted. I have a very small build and was naturally thin. I was not a moron and did not need therapy. I am now 165, not at all fat but feel I could lose 10 lbs.

It was people like you that made me feel ugly.

+1 Thanks for accusing me of mental illness. I eat more than most women I know. This is just my body. Good to know you're judging, tho.

Pp you clearly started the judgement. I'm 5'4 and about 115. Everyone I know calls me tiny. You do sound sick.

I'm 5'9'', 115lbs, and have been since college. I'm not sick, or anorexic, or anything else. It's just how I'm built. My whole family is built similarly - long, lean, and narrow. I may not have the "ideal" body type based on whatever completely constructed and subjective beauty standards there are out there, but my body is valid. Please stop with the body-shaming.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

5'2" and 110 lbs and I'm a fatass? OK! Not sure why you felt the need to be offensive but it's an anon board; please watch what you write/try not to give someone an eating disorder.

NP. I wouldn’t say you’re a “fatass” (such a vulgar term) but I’m 5’8” and 110 and I am slender but nowhere near emaciated. I can only imagine I would look a bit thick at this weight half a foot shorter.

Whoa - that's some really disordered thinking.

Right? In what world is someone who is 5'2 and 110 pounds "a bit thick"? I'm also 5''2 and 110. I wear a size 0 and am routinely told how "tiny" I am.

Pp who is 5'8 and 110, I am quite certain you look like skeletor and people you know speculate that you probably have an eating disorder.

There are naturally slender people. It is unkind to call someone skeletal .

5'2 and 110 pounds is "slender." The Pp who is 5'8 and 110 is not only rude but probably looks like she is ill.

Agreed. 5’6” and slim here. To the anorexic morons here, proudly posting grossly underweight stats: you wear your mental illness like a badge of honor. Don’t f-ck up your daughters (too late, probably) and get some goddamned therapy.

This is what I am talking about. I was naturally really thin until I hit my forties, 5'11" and 120 to 125 in my 20s which is an average of 17 BMI. I ate healthfully, did not overeat but ate what I wanted. I have a very small build and was naturally thin. I was not a moron and did not need therapy. I am now 165, not at all fat but feel I could lose 10 lbs.

It was people like you that made me feel ugly.

+1 Thanks for accusing me of mental illness. I eat more than most women I know. This is just my body. Good to know you're judging, tho.

Pp you clearly started the judgement. I'm 5'4 and about 115. Everyone I know calls me tiny. You do sound sick.

Lots of good advice here. One more for instant and absolutely free results - maintain excellent posture. So many people forget about it. Makes you look more slender, taller and of course, more confident.

Anonymous wrote:Drink Water
8 hours of sleep every single day
not a drop of alcohol
yoga
meditation
therapy
facials weekly


Lotion your face and your body daily

No gluten, carbs from a "box", preservatives in food
No fake sugar
no soda
No caffeine
No... none... not a drop of alcohol

only 1 fruit serving a day
many veggies
1 serving a meat a day
no dairy
10 nuts

Many reps of low weights
Run but no more than 5 miles... you end up walking like a duck if you run too much
sit ups, pushups, squats, lunges... every single day

This sounds so miserable. I'd rather let myself go!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

5'2" and 110 lbs and I'm a fatass? OK! Not sure why you felt the need to be offensive but it's an anon board; please watch what you write/try not to give someone an eating disorder.

NP. I wouldn’t say you’re a “fatass” (such a vulgar term) but I’m 5’8” and 110 and I am slender but nowhere near emaciated. I can only imagine I would look a bit thick at this weight half a foot shorter.

Whoa - that's some really disordered thinking.

Right? In what world is someone who is 5'2 and 110 pounds "a bit thick"? I'm also 5''2 and 110. I wear a size 0 and am routinely told how "tiny" I am.

Pp who is 5'8 and 110, I am quite certain you look like skeletor and people you know speculate that you probably have an eating disorder.

There are naturally slender people. It is unkind to call someone skeletal .

5'2 and 110 pounds is "slender." The Pp who is 5'8 and 110 is not only rude but probably looks like she is ill.

Agreed. 5’6” and slim here. To the anorexic morons here, proudly posting grossly underweight stats: you wear your mental illness like a badge of honor. Don’t f-ck up your daughters (too late, probably) and get some goddamned therapy.

This is what I am talking about. I was naturally really thin until I hit my forties, 5'11" and 120 to 125 in my 20s which is an average of 17 BMI. I ate healthfully, did not overeat but ate what I wanted. I have a very small build and was naturally thin. I was not a moron and did not need therapy. I am now 165, not at all fat but feel I could lose 10 lbs.

It was people like you that made me feel ugly.

+1 Thanks for accusing me of mental illness. I eat more than most women I know. This is just my body. Good to know you're judging, tho.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

5'2" and 110 lbs and I'm a fatass? OK! Not sure why you felt the need to be offensive but it's an anon board; please watch what you write/try not to give someone an eating disorder.

NP. I wouldn’t say you’re a “fatass” (such a vulgar term) but I’m 5’8” and 110 and I am slender but nowhere near emaciated. I can only imagine I would look a bit thick at this weight half a foot shorter.

Whoa - that's some really disordered thinking.

Right? In what world is someone who is 5'2 and 110 pounds "a bit thick"? I'm also 5''2 and 110. I wear a size 0 and am routinely told how "tiny" I am.

Pp who is 5'8 and 110, I am quite certain you look like skeletor and people you know speculate that you probably have an eating disorder.

There are naturally slender people. It is unkind to call someone skeletal .

5'2 and 110 pounds is "slender." The Pp who is 5'8 and 110 is not only rude but probably looks like she is ill.

Agreed. 5’6” and slim here. To the anorexic morons here, proudly posting grossly underweight stats: you wear your mental illness like a badge of honor. Don’t f-ck up your daughters (too late, probably) and get some goddamned therapy.

This is what I am talking about. I was naturally really thin until I hit my forties, 5'11" and 120 to 125 in my 20s which is an average of 17 BMI. I ate healthfully, did not overeat but ate what I wanted. I have a very small build and was naturally thin. I was not a moron and did not need therapy. I am now 165, not at all fat but feel I could lose 10 lbs.

It was people like you that made me feel ugly.