Anonymous wrote:Looks like the post was actually taken down?!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OMG the OP of that post just admitted she doesn't know where the arrest occurred, Arlington or FFX!
Guess I still have some capacity for shock.
I almost fell out of my chair!![]()
![]()
If the OP of that had any integrity, she'd take it down. We'll see. Cue the supporters that fake news is OK in 3, 2, 1......
0.00% chance it comes down. Don't you CARE that this child got arrested??
What was the alleged crime? Marijuana possession? Murder?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OMG the OP of that post just admitted she doesn't know where the arrest occurred, Arlington or FFX!
Guess I still have some capacity for shock.
I almost fell out of my chair!![]()
![]()
If the OP of that had any integrity, she'd take it down. We'll see. Cue the supporters that fake news is OK in 3, 2, 1......
0.00% chance it comes down. Don't you CARE that this child got arrested??
What was the alleged crime? Marijuana possession? Murder?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OMG the OP of that post just admitted she doesn't know where the arrest occurred, Arlington or FFX!
Guess I still have some capacity for shock.
I almost fell out of my chair!![]()
![]()
If the OP of that had any integrity, she'd take it down. We'll see. Cue the supporters that fake news is OK in 3, 2, 1......
0.00% chance it comes down. Don't you CARE that this child got arrested??
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OMG the OP of that post just admitted she doesn't know where the arrest occurred, Arlington or FFX!
Guess I still have some capacity for shock.
I almost fell out of my chair!![]()
![]()
If the OP of that had any integrity, she'd take it down. We'll see. Cue the supporters that fake news is OK in 3, 2, 1......
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OMG the OP of that post just admitted she doesn't know where the arrest occurred, Arlington or FFX!
Guess I still have some capacity for shock.
I almost fell out of my chair!![]()
![]()
Anonymous wrote:OMG the OP of that post just admitted she doesn't know where the arrest occurred, Arlington or FFX!
Guess I still have some capacity for shock.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I look forward to the election being over after tomorrow.
To the Tafti supporters who have made their way over - At this point you have made multiple claims that ended up being either completely false or severely misrepresented about Stamos. You can present whatever stories about your friend's child that you want at this point, I am not going to believe you are giving an accurate representation of the situation. You are too biased.
Yes! And I’m sure your kid’s friend and his parents didn’t really appreciate you sharing that experience on their behalf, especially since you are “waiting for more details” which surely will fit your narrative.
+1
Such an invasion of privacy!
Right! They don't even know why the child was arrested, but several people are up in arms that it isn't fair or that the bond was unreasonable. Why is the first step always to jump to bad intentions? I don't think anyone needs to know why the kid was arrested (for a crime, obviously) b/c it is no one's business. That is exactly why it SHOULDN'T be on AEM. What is wrong with that poster?
Desperation on the eve of the primary.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I look forward to the election being over after tomorrow.
To the Tafti supporters who have made their way over - At this point you have made multiple claims that ended up being either completely false or severely misrepresented about Stamos. You can present whatever stories about your friend's child that you want at this point, I am not going to believe you are giving an accurate representation of the situation. You are too biased.
Yes! And I’m sure your kid’s friend and his parents didn’t really appreciate you sharing that experience on their behalf, especially since you are “waiting for more details” which surely will fit your narrative.
+1
Such an invasion of privacy!
Right! They don't even know why the child was arrested, but several people are up in arms that it isn't fair or that the bond was unreasonable. Why is the first step always to jump to bad intentions? I don't think anyone needs to know why the kid was arrested (for a crime, obviously) b/c it is no one's business. That is exactly why it SHOULDN'T be on AEM. What is wrong with that poster?