Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s the principal. He is pushing out pro-IB/pro-Hoover teachers. These are all excellent teachers with many years with IB program.
You have absolutely no idea what you are talking about yet you get on this forum and act as if you do. You are not privy to the reasons behind people leaving yet you speculate and start rumors. What's your idea of an "excellent" teacher? No one gives a SH*# about Hoover anymore and anyone who knows what really happened understands why she is gone. Stop acting like you have some inside knowledge. You don't! Where's your education degree? Where's your knowledge of MCPS policy? If you don't like it, go! That's the real deal! It applies to teachers AND parents. Quite frankly, I do not understand why you and your type get any air time.
Aaaaand mic drop.
Sorry, the parents and students are the ultimate consumers of this system. MCPS is being run from our tax dollars. RMIB Diploma rate has fallen after the departure of Hoover and now other teachers. Parents, students and teachers don't need to leave the system. The administrators need to leave the system. The irony is that there will be no court case against the substandard Principal who is a bully and just wants to be there riding on the glory of the RMIB program but does not want to nurture it. He is not the only psychopath. MCPS Central office and the guardianship of the current BOE allowed such people to thrive in MCPS.
Did you read the case brought on by Hoover against MCPS? You make it sound like it was entirely the Principal's fault that she left. It wasn't.
A school district is not the same as a business. It cannot be driven by the wants of a small group of parents. It doesn't work that way, just as we as taxpayers can't always decide where our tax dollars go. The only thing we can do is vote, either with our feet or at the polls.
-signed a parent in the RM cluster, one in IB,
Where can one read the case Hoover brought against MCPS?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s the principal. He is pushing out pro-IB/pro-Hoover teachers. These are all excellent teachers with many years with IB program.
You have absolutely no idea what you are talking about yet you get on this forum and act as if you do. You are not privy to the reasons behind people leaving yet you speculate and start rumors. What's your idea of an "excellent" teacher? No one gives a SH*# about Hoover anymore and anyone who knows what really happened understands why she is gone. Stop acting like you have some inside knowledge. You don't! Where's your education degree? Where's your knowledge of MCPS policy? If you don't like it, go! That's the real deal! It applies to teachers AND parents. Quite frankly, I do not understand why you and your type get any air time.
Aaaaand mic drop.
Sorry, the parents and students are the ultimate consumers of this system. MCPS is being run from our tax dollars. RMIB Diploma rate has fallen after the departure of Hoover and now other teachers. Parents, students and teachers don't need to leave the system. The administrators need to leave the system. The irony is that there will be no court case against the substandard Principal who is a bully and just wants to be there riding on the glory of the RMIB program but does not want to nurture it. He is not the only psychopath. MCPS Central office and the guardianship of the current BOE allowed such people to thrive in MCPS.
Did you read the case brought on by Hoover against MCPS? You make it sound like it was entirely the Principal's fault that she left. It wasn't.
A school district is not the same as a business. It cannot be driven by the wants of a small group of parents. It doesn't work that way, just as we as taxpayers can't always decide where our tax dollars go. The only thing we can do is vote, either with our feet or at the polls.
-signed a parent in the RM cluster, one in IB,
Anonymous wrote:
Sorry, the parents and students are the ultimate consumers of this system. MCPS is being run from our tax dollars. RMIB Diploma rate has fallen after the departure of Hoover and now other teachers. Parents, students and teachers don't need to leave the system. The administrators need to leave the system. The irony is that there will be no court case against the substandard Principal who is a bully and just wants to be there riding on the glory of the RMIB program but does not want to nurture it. He is not the only psychopath. MCPS Central office and the guardianship of the current BOE allowed such people to thrive in MCPS.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s the principal. He is pushing out pro-IB/pro-Hoover teachers. These are all excellent teachers with many years with IB program.
You have absolutely no idea what you are talking about yet you get on this forum and act as if you do. You are not privy to the reasons behind people leaving yet you speculate and start rumors. What's your idea of an "excellent" teacher? No one gives a SH*# about Hoover anymore and anyone who knows what really happened understands why she is gone. Stop acting like you have some inside knowledge. You don't! Where's your education degree? Where's your knowledge of MCPS policy? If you don't like it, go! That's the real deal! It applies to teachers AND parents. Quite frankly, I do not understand why you and your type get any air time.
Aaaaand mic drop.
Sorry, the parents and students are the ultimate consumers of this system. MCPS is being run from our tax dollars. RMIB Diploma rate has fallen after the departure of Hoover and now other teachers. Parents, students and teachers don't need to leave the system. The administrators need to leave the system. The irony is that there will be no court case against the substandard Principal who is a bully and just wants to be there riding on the glory of the RMIB program but does not want to nurture it. He is not the only psychopath. MCPS Central office and the guardianship of the current BOE allowed such people to thrive in MCPS.
Anonymous wrote:if kids just do their school work, all these would be pointless.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s the principal. He is pushing out pro-IB/pro-Hoover teachers. These are all excellent teachers with many years with IB program.
You have absolutely no idea what you are talking about yet you get on this forum and act as if you do. You are not privy to the reasons behind people leaving yet you speculate and start rumors. What's your idea of an "excellent" teacher? No one gives a SH*# about Hoover anymore and anyone who knows what really happened understands why she is gone. Stop acting like you have some inside knowledge. You don't! Where's your education degree? Where's your knowledge of MCPS policy? If you don't like it, go! That's the real deal! It applies to teachers AND parents. Quite frankly, I do not understand why you and your type get any air time.
Aaaaand mic drop.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:"Could anyone expain the 50% rule?"
I'll do you one better, I'll show you the actual language that is in the MCPS Grading and Reporting document:
"Assigning a grade lower than 50 percent to a task/assessment [is prohibited]. However, if a student does no work on the task/assessment, the teacher will assign a zero. If a teacher determines the student did not attempt to meet the basic requirements of the task/assessment or the student engaged in academic dishonesty, the teacher may assign a zero"
Source: https://www.montgomeryschoolsmd.org/departments/policy/pdf/ikara.pdf
"If my child took a math test with 10 problems to solve and finished all but only got 5 correct answers, shoul$ he receive 50% for this rest?"
He should, and would.
My issue with the 50% rule is the zeros for work that is less than 50% attempted.
I’m going to use an actual example for this past school year without identifying the student.
Student never completed a homework assignment. It was either not attempted at all or about 20-30% attempted. The parent was aware of this all year and took the position that homework was the student’s problem. MP 1-3 final grades were Bs and Cs. MP 4, Student blew the final project. Then the parent wanted to protest all the zeroes for quarter 4 homework. Parent wanted them all bumped up to 50% trying to eke out a C from a D. Under the old system, I could have entered the actual grades of 20, 25, 30 percent and we wouldn’t have even wasted time discussing this on the last day of school. In the end, my admin supported the D because I could document ten months of homework-related emails to the parent.
So you are saying this kid was harmed because his 20% became a 0 because s/he did not attempt every problem?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:"Could anyone expain the 50% rule?"
I'll do you one better, I'll show you the actual language that is in the MCPS Grading and Reporting document:
"Assigning a grade lower than 50 percent to a task/assessment [is prohibited]. However, if a student does no work on the task/assessment, the teacher will assign a zero. If a teacher determines the student did not attempt to meet the basic requirements of the task/assessment or the student engaged in academic dishonesty, the teacher may assign a zero"
Source: https://www.montgomeryschoolsmd.org/departments/policy/pdf/ikara.pdf
"If my child took a math test with 10 problems to solve and finished all but only got 5 correct answers, shoul$ he receive 50% for this rest?"
He should, and would.
My issue with the 50% rule is the zeros for work that is less than 50% attempted.
I’m going to use an actual example for this past school year without identifying the student.
Student never completed a homework assignment. It was either not attempted at all or about 20-30% attempted. The parent was aware of this all year and took the position that homework was the student’s problem. MP 1-3 final grades were Bs and Cs. MP 4, Student blew the final project. Then the parent wanted to protest all the zeroes for quarter 4 homework. Parent wanted them all bumped up to 50% trying to eke out a C from a D. Under the old system, I could have entered the actual grades of 20, 25, 30 percent and we wouldn’t have even wasted time discussing this on the last day of school. In the end, my admin supported the D because I could document ten months of homework-related emails to the parent.
Anonymous wrote:"Could anyone expain the 50% rule?"
I'll do you one better, I'll show you the actual language that is in the MCPS Grading and Reporting document:
"Assigning a grade lower than 50 percent to a task/assessment [is prohibited]. However, if a student does no work on the task/assessment, the teacher will assign a zero. If a teacher determines the student did not attempt to meet the basic requirements of the task/assessment or the student engaged in academic dishonesty, the teacher may assign a zero"
Source: https://www.montgomeryschoolsmd.org/departments/policy/pdf/ikara.pdf
"If my child took a math test with 10 problems to solve and finished all but only got 5 correct answers, shoul$ he receive 50% for this rest?"
He should, and would.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s the principal. He is pushing out pro-IB/pro-Hoover teachers. These are all excellent teachers with many years with IB program.
You have absolutely no idea what you are talking about yet you get on this forum and act as if you do. You are not privy to the reasons behind people leaving yet you speculate and start rumors. What's your idea of an "excellent" teacher? No one gives a SH*# about Hoover anymore and anyone who knows what really happened understands why she is gone. Stop acting like you have some inside knowledge. You don't! Where's your education degree? Where's your knowledge of MCPS policy? If you don't like it, go! That's the real deal! It applies to teachers AND parents. Quite frankly, I do not understand why you and your type get any air time.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:"If you look at a typical scoring rubric that assigns 0-5 points"
This is a false premise. A rubric that assigns 0-5 points is not even close to "typical". In fact, I don't know a single teacher that grades any major assignments out of only 5 points.
Again, you're distract by an unnecessary detail.
It's not an unnecessary detail. Your entire argument was to say that rubrics that assign 0-5 points lead to unfair grade outcomes, and you used this to try and argue for the 50% rule. Given that 0-5 rubrics are not "typical", as you claimed, it renders your entire argument moot.
If a test is scored out of 100 points, then "C" level work means earning between 70 and 79 points. You score each question and add up the points. That's it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:"If you look at a typical scoring rubric that assigns 0-5 points"
This is a false premise. A rubric that assigns 0-5 points is not even close to "typical". In fact, I don't know a single teacher that grades any major assignments out of only 5 points.
Again, you're distract by an unnecessary detail.
It's not an unnecessary detail. Your entire argument was to say that rubrics that assign 0-5 points lead to unfair grade outcomes, and you used this to try and argue for the 50% rule. Given that 0-5 rubrics are not "typical", as you claimed, it renders your entire argument moot.
If a test is scored out of 100 points, then "C" level work means earning between 70 and 79 points. You score each question and add up the points. That's it.