Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Thank you but I am in boundary, with sibling preference and Spanish proficiency. It hurts to see that they accept whoever they want and that what they sell as a "rigorous admission process" is that a personal decision, not sure based on what. I am not so much interested in trying to appeal the decision as in making sure that the process becomes open and fair, which it is not at the moment. Glad to hear that parents are doing something and I believe that the more complaints they get, the more likely they are to be forced to do something. Will a lawyer help?
Probably not, but why don’t you hire a lawyer and see what happens. You won’t be the first person to (unsuccessfully) sue Oyster because you don’t like the admissions result.
You’re also NOT an IB parent.
On the bright side, you may be better off staying away from Oyster the upcoming year as there will be changes that nobody can explain to you (90% Spanish copy cat from Marie Reed for instance). Do I want my child to be a guinea pig? I attended a parent meeting for kinder and decided to look for another school. My IB friend has not made up her mind either and parents who know about language learning will have doubts. Watch the spots for changes and report back....
Oyster’s switch to a 90/10 (Spanish/English) model in PK4 and K is based on research and best practices:
https://carla.umn.edu/immersion/acie/vol10/may2007_researchminority.html
“ELL students in 90:10 programs attain the same levels of proficiency in English and the same or higher standards of achievement in reading/language arts and math (measured in English) as ELL students in 50:50 programs. Thus, more exposure to instructional time in English does not lead to an improvement in English language proficiency or achievement in reading/language arts and math as measured in English.“
Btw, WIS follows the 90/10 model in PK and K as well. At WIS, 1st through 5th is 50/50.
You can always find evidence for anything (50:50, 80:20, 90/10...) if you look for it. Nothing convincing was given to us and this "research" you linked is just a summary (no references) more than 10 years old intended for ELL (English Language Learners) not to drop out of school (in San Jose, California?). Would you try a treatment that a doctor gives you based on so called "evidence" that is not up to date? I would not.
If given a choice to believe research from the highly respected Center for Advanced Research on Language Acquisition at the University of Minnesota, or you (an anonymous poster with an ax to grind with Oyster), I’ll go with the former.
Btw, a quick Google search yields additional research that strongly supports the 90/10 model:
https://sole-jole.org/16111.pdf (From 2015)
https://www.americancouncils.org/sites/default/files/DLI-portfolio.pdf
https://www.littleelmisd.net/cms/lib5/TX01918043/Centricity/Domain/130/Dual%20Language%20Program%20-%20Research.pdf
https://www.berkeleyschools.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/TWIAstounding_Effectiveness_Dual_Language_Ed.pdf?864d7e
http://www.cal.org/twi/toolkit/PI/P_QA/parent_a3.htm
“Comparing the achievement of students in 90/10 and 50/50 models, Lindholm-Leary (2001) found that by Grades 7-8, English language learners and native-English-speaking students scored similarly to their peers of the same language and economic backgrounds on achievement tests in English. When achievement was measured in Spanish, students in 90/10 programs scored higher than students in 50/50 programs. Thus, more instructional time spent in Spanish positively affected achievement in Spanish and had no negative effect on achievement measured in English.”