Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Is TP seats are for entire DCC or only for TP? If it's only for TP, it makes no sense.
+1
What's so unique about TP to give them quota?
Many MCCPTA leaders and county executives live in TP.
Yo crazy people every MS magnet in MCPS has a set aside for the host school because it doesn't cost anything as has been explained here about 1000 times.
Yup. Roberto Clemente MS had it. I don't know if MLK MS has taken over the Humanities one, but I would assume so.
They shouldn't have it because if we are putting 25 kids n magnet from one middle school then that means that middle school has large enough peer group.
You're shifting the goalposts.
The kids who at Roberto Clemente MS who benefit from the set-aside are, by and large, not white kids. They're Asian-American kids.
Shifting goal post???
Same person???
Come, on lots of people post here.
Since MCPS is focusing on peer group and if peer group is large enough then they shouldn't be in magnet. That's what MCPS is saying.
Clearly, if Roberto Clemente MS or TPMS is having 25 kids good enough for magnet then they don't need to be in magnet. Magnet seats should be given to others who don't have large enough peer group.
Then they'll get rid of the 25 seats, and the outliers at TPMS will take some of the 100 seats currently designated for OOB. This is so stupid. Same for RCMS. Less kids served all around. Certainly fewer OOB kids. If that's what you want....
No, MCPS shouldn't get rid of those 25 seats because there are enough teachers to educate 125 magnet students. They should simply allow 125 as county wide seat and not give backdoor entry to magnet to anyone. As far as capacity of school is concerned, it should be addressed by county wide boundary change to balance everything. This is one issue I want consultant to look closely when doing boundary analysis.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Is TP seats are for entire DCC or only for TP? If it's only for TP, it makes no sense.
+1
What's so unique about TP to give them quota?
Many MCCPTA leaders and county executives live in TP.
Yo crazy people every MS magnet in MCPS has a set aside for the host school because it doesn't cost anything as has been explained here about 1000 times.
Yup. Roberto Clemente MS had it. I don't know if MLK MS has taken over the Humanities one, but I would assume so.
They shouldn't have it because if we are putting 25 kids n magnet from one middle school then that means that middle school has large enough peer group.
You're shifting the goalposts.
The kids who at Roberto Clemente MS who benefit from the set-aside are, by and large, not white kids. They're Asian-American kids.
Shifting goal post???
Same person???
Come, on lots of people post here.
Since MCPS is focusing on peer group and if peer group is large enough then they shouldn't be in magnet. That's what MCPS is saying.
Clearly, if Roberto Clemente MS or TPMS is having 25 kids good enough for magnet then they don't need to be in magnet. Magnet seats should be given to others who don't have large enough peer group.
Then they'll get rid of the 25 seats, and the outliers at TPMS will take some of the 100 seats currently designated for OOB. This is so stupid. Same for RCMS. Less kids served all around. Certainly fewer OOB kids. If that's what you want....
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Is TP seats are for entire DCC or only for TP? If it's only for TP, it makes no sense.
+1
What's so unique about TP to give them quota?
Many MCCPTA leaders and county executives live in TP.
Yo crazy people every MS magnet in MCPS has a set aside for the host school because it doesn't cost anything as has been explained here about 1000 times.
Yup. Roberto Clemente MS had it. I don't know if MLK MS has taken over the Humanities one, but I would assume so.
They shouldn't have it because if we are putting 25 kids n magnet from one middle school then that means that middle school has large enough peer group.
You're shifting the goalposts.
The kids who at Roberto Clemente MS who benefit from the set-aside are, by and large, not white kids. They're Asian-American kids.
Shifting goal post???
Same person???
Come, on lots of people post here.
Since MCPS is focusing on peer group and if peer group is large enough then they shouldn't be in magnet. That's what MCPS is saying.
Clearly, if Roberto Clemente MS or TPMS is having 25 kids good enough for magnet then they don't need to be in magnet. Magnet seats should be given to others who don't have large enough peer group.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Is TP seats are for entire DCC or only for TP? If it's only for TP, it makes no sense.
+1
What's so unique about TP to give them quota?
Many MCCPTA leaders and county executives live in TP.
Yo crazy people every MS magnet in MCPS has a set aside for the host school because it doesn't cost anything as has been explained here about 1000 times.
Yup. Roberto Clemente MS had it. I don't know if MLK MS has taken over the Humanities one, but I would assume so.
They shouldn't have it because if we are putting 25 kids n magnet from one middle school then that means that middle school has large enough peer group.
You're shifting the goalposts.
The kids who at Roberto Clemente MS who benefit from the set-aside are, by and large, not white kids. They're Asian-American kids.
Shifting goal post???
Same person???
Come, on lots of people post here.
Since MCPS is focusing on peer group and if peer group is large enough then they shouldn't be in magnet. That's what MCPS is saying.
Clearly, if Roberto Clemente MS or TPMS is having 25 kids good enough for magnet then they don't need to be in magnet. Magnet seats should be given to others who don't have large enough peer group.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It is nuts that the same bitter t-mom whose kid was rejected from TPMS keeps posting the same unintelligible drivel over and over.
There are many participants on this thread. I predict end to the set aside. If Cold Spring can't have its 20 seats, how can Takoma Park keep 25?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Is TP seats are for entire DCC or only for TP? If it's only for TP, it makes no sense.
+1
What's so unique about TP to give them quota?
Many MCCPTA leaders and county executives live in TP.
Yo crazy people every MS magnet in MCPS has a set aside for the host school because it doesn't cost anything as has been explained here about 1000 times.
Yup. Roberto Clemente MS had it. I don't know if MLK MS has taken over the Humanities one, but I would assume so.
They shouldn't have it because if we are putting 25 kids n magnet from one middle school then that means that middle school has large enough peer group.
You're shifting the goalposts.
The kids who at Roberto Clemente MS who benefit from the set-aside are, by and large, not white kids. They're Asian-American kids.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The TP kids are not any smarter than kids from inbound for Eastern or SSIM and they certainly are not smarter than the kids from Frost, Hoover or Pyle.
The fed investigation is going to see all these white kids from TP with much lower scores than not only the rest of the magnet but from OOB kids that were denied admissions.
You can't say that one school with 25 kids that score well enough to do magnet work need to stay in their home school because they have a cohort yet another school with 25 kids that don't score as high yet can do the work get to be in a magnet.
Where to start with this idiocy?
1. You have no idea how TP kids are scoring. Would you like to see my kids' scores? They were significantly above the median. No one said TP kids are smarter than any other area, but there certainly are enough to fill the spaces and then some, and they are certainly no less smart than Frost/Hoover/Pyle (not sure why you make a distinction between these schools and others). I will say there was a larger representation of PBES at our HGC several years ago than any other elementary.
2. Not all kids coming from TP are white. I don't know where you're getting this nonsense.
3. You have completely missed the point of the 25 kids. It's not a cohort thing. It's a resources issue coupled with an integration issue. The TP kids FREE UP spots for out of boundary kids.
Trump may have made this kind of wishful-thinking "alternative facts" a thing, but just because you want it to be true does not mean the facts support it. Quit bashing the kids and advocate for more spaces overall.
Isn't that a bit wishful thinking? There are Magnet level teachers and classrooms for 125 kids.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:FYI TPMS has already started their renovations to expand the school so the overcrowding issue of adding 75 additional out of boundary magnet slots (instead of keeping the 75 in boundary slots) is not real.
It was never real. The in bound seats are a leftover vestige of white privilege. Time to end this.
It's common for Asian families to leave Potomac for TKPK these days because they value their children's education.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The TPMS parent vehemently trying to defend her entitlement to easy set aside seats is really shooting herself in the foot.
An addition 20 inbound TPMS student who perform at or above grade level can easily be absorbed into the general program. Its the increase in kids with learning disabilities or who are performing several grade levels behind and need to be in collaborative or lower ratio classes that create more os a strain on staffing levels.
Parents don't realize that there is a cut off in all advanced classes that doesn't always correlate with who can do the work. Many of the inbound TPMS students are better suited to the advanced track in the general program. By pulling them away, there are fewer advanced track classes. If they go into the general program then more non advanced track classes can flip to advanced which will open the door to kids who are in on grade level math but could move up if there were more peers available.
From a score standpoint, the overall growth at TPMS, like most schools in MCPS, is coming from kids who are performing below grade level and achieving lower scores. Making all 75 seats open to the entire potential applicant pool and accepting the top performers or outliers while keeping the inbound TPMS students that score high but not as well in the general program helps offset the shifting % of students toward lower performance.
There is no way that allowing the inbound seats to predominantly go to white kids that score lower than OOB minorities is going to hold up with a federal investigation into discrimination. One of the easy remedies to save the program from being shut down altogether is to allow those seats not to be hoarded by white families with lower scoring kids but to be competed fairly throughout the county.
There is so much wrong here, the whole post needs to be bolded. Please stop with the unsubstantiated assumptions. I am guessing you have no experience with TPMS, magnet or non-magnet.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Is TP seats are for entire DCC or only for TP? If it's only for TP, it makes no sense.
+1
What's so unique about TP to give them quota?
Many MCCPTA leaders and county executives live in TP.
Yo crazy people every MS magnet in MCPS has a set aside for the host school because it doesn't cost anything as has been explained here about 1000 times.
Yup. Roberto Clemente MS had it. I don't know if MLK MS has taken over the Humanities one, but I would assume so.
They shouldn't have it because if we are putting 25 kids n magnet from one middle school then that means that middle school has large enough peer group.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Is TP seats are for entire DCC or only for TP? If it's only for TP, it makes no sense.
+1
What's so unique about TP to give them quota?
Many MCCPTA leaders and county executives live in TP.
Yo crazy people every MS magnet in MCPS has a set aside for the host school because it doesn't cost anything as has been explained here about 1000 times.
Yup. Roberto Clemente MS had it. I don't know if MLK MS has taken over the Humanities one, but I would assume so.
They shouldn't have it because if we are putting 25 kids n magnet from one middle school then that means that middle school has large enough peer group.
Anonymous wrote:FYI TPMS has already started their renovations to expand the school so the overcrowding issue of adding 75 additional out of boundary magnet slots (instead of keeping the 75 in boundary slots) is not real.
It was never real. The in bound seats are a leftover vestige of white privilege. Time to end this.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Is TP seats are for entire DCC or only for TP? If it's only for TP, it makes no sense.
+1
What's so unique about TP to give them quota?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Is TP seats are for entire DCC or only for TP? If it's only for TP, it makes no sense.
+1
What's so unique about TP to give them quota?
Many MCCPTA leaders and county executives live in TP.
Yo crazy people every MS magnet in MCPS has a set aside for the host school because it doesn't cost anything as has been explained here about 1000 times.
Yup. Roberto Clemente MS had it. I don't know if MLK MS has taken over the Humanities one, but I would assume so.