Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Tulsi is a democrat that will appeal to many republican voters. Maybe that's the problem -- quasi neo-con Hillary-biden types.

Disagree. She is exceedingly unimpressive as a candidate in my mind. Her CNN town hall was simply boring. Dems have too many candidates that really have nothing to offer. And I am a long-time Democrat. Several need to drop out, including her.

Nothing unimpressive about a kick ass woman of color who was a major in the reserves, surfs, and wants to keep us out of wars.

What’s your real agenda, friend?

+1

The Tulsi hatred here is laughable. She’s exposed professional Democrats as frauds and they’ Lashing out at her for that.

I'm listening to her interview with Rogan now.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kR8UcnwLH24&app=desktop

She is very impressive. I love her background and her thoughts on our international relations.

Extreme liberals will not like her, but we can't be run by extremists on either side.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Tulsi is a democrat that will appeal to many republican voters. Maybe that's the problem -- quasi neo-con Hillary-biden types.

Disagree. She is exceedingly unimpressive as a candidate in my mind. Her CNN town hall was simply boring. Dems have too many candidates that really have nothing to offer. And I am a long-time Democrat. Several need to drop out, including her.

She's the only Democratic candidate that always saw the Russia BS for what it was. That alone makes her worthy of serious consideration.

What has she said about the “Russia BS”?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Tulsi is a democrat that will appeal to many republican voters. Maybe that's the problem -- quasi neo-con Hillary-biden types.

Disagree. She is exceedingly unimpressive as a candidate in my mind. Her CNN town hall was simply boring. Dems have too many candidates that really have nothing to offer. And I am a long-time Democrat. Several need to drop out, including her.

She's the only Democratic candidate that always saw the Russia BS for what it was. That alone makes her worthy of serious consideration.

The Russia thing was not BS, whether or not Trump is guilty of anything. Read the report.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Tulsi is a democrat that will appeal to many republican voters. Maybe that's the problem -- quasi neo-con Hillary-biden types.

Disagree. She is exceedingly unimpressive as a candidate in my mind. Her CNN town hall was simply boring. Dems have too many candidates that really have nothing to offer. And I am a long-time Democrat. Several need to drop out, including her.

She's the only Democratic candidate that always saw the Russia BS for what it was. That alone makes her worthy of serious consideration.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Tulsi is a democrat that will appeal to many republican voters. Maybe that's the problem -- quasi neo-con Hillary-biden types.

Disagree. She is exceedingly unimpressive as a candidate in my mind. Her CNN town hall was simply boring. Dems have too many candidates that really have nothing to offer. And I am a long-time Democrat. Several need to drop out, including her.

Nothing unimpressive about a kick ass woman of color who was a major in the reserves, surfs, and wants to keep us out of wars.

What’s your real agenda, friend?

+1

The Tulsi hatred here is laughable. She’s exposed professional Democrats as frauds and they’ Lashing out at her for that.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Tulsi is a democrat that will appeal to many republican voters. Maybe that's the problem -- quasi neo-con Hillary-biden types.

Disagree. She is exceedingly unimpressive as a candidate in my mind. Her CNN town hall was simply boring. Dems have too many candidates that really have nothing to offer. And I am a long-time Democrat. Several need to drop out, including her.

Nothing unimpressive about a kick ass woman of color who was a major in the reserves, surfs, and wants to keep us out of wars.

What’s your real agenda, friend?

Anonymous wrote:
Tulsi is a democrat that will appeal to many republican voters. Maybe that's the problem -- quasi neo-con Hillary-biden types.

Disagree. She is exceedingly unimpressive as a candidate in my mind. Her CNN town hall was simply boring. Dems have too many candidates that really have nothing to offer. And I am a long-time Democrat. Several need to drop out, including her.

Black Swan author Nassim Taleb has endorsed Tulsi!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Tulsi is the most authentic person in the race, maybe tied w Bernie.

More so than Amtrak Joe? Cory Booker?

Much more so than Biden - what a phoney.

Booker is just authentically .... low iq

Rhodes Scholars are not low iq.

Let’s not go there. Comment stands.

Where exactly are we not going? Into your dreamworld in which a guy who gets a BA and MA from Stanford, where he made the All–Pacific-10 Academic team and was elected senior class president, gets a Rhodes Scholarship to study at Oxford, and graduates from Yale Law School is “low iq”?

NP. Credentialism, especially the ultra-predictable DC type, is the height of middlebrow. Show me where Booker did well in an environment that wasn't best modeled as a discrete game.

He beat the corrupt mayor of Newark, last in a long line of corrupt mayors of Newark, as a total outsider.

From which universe are you posting, bub?

The one where everything posted above is correct? Why can’t you engage on the substance of the discussion?

So an alternate universe? Booker lost in his election to the sitting mayor Newark.

And you really don't understand the world if you describe a politician who's a Rhodie and Yale Law grad as a "total outsider".

And given Booker's love to tech and pharma $$$, I'm not sure I want to be singing his praises by calling others 'corrupt'.

Where did I say he won the first time? And you don’t understand Newark if you think being a “Rhodie and a Yale Law grad” helps you win an election there.

Regarding corruption? Booker’s predecessor was convicted of five counts of fraud by a federal jury and sentenced to 27 months. The guy before that was indicted for bribery and for stealing funds from a school construction project; those charges were dismissed but he still pleaded guilty to tax evasion. The guy before THAT was found guilty by a federal jury on 64 counts of conspiracy and extortion and sentenced to ten years. Then there was one guy who was OK, but before him there was a guy charged by a grand jury with receiving kickbacks. Culture of corruption is an understatement. Call me when you have something more than accepting legal political campaign donations.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Tulsi is the most authentic person in the race, maybe tied w Bernie.

More so than Amtrak Joe? Cory Booker?

Much more so than Biden - what a phoney.

Booker is just authentically .... low iq

Rhodes Scholars are not low iq.

Let’s not go there. Comment stands.

Where exactly are we not going? Into your dreamworld in which a guy who gets a BA and MA from Stanford, where he made the All–Pacific-10 Academic team and was elected senior class president, gets a Rhodes Scholarship to study at Oxford, and graduates from Yale Law School is “low iq”?

NP. Credentialism, especially the ultra-predictable DC type, is the height of middlebrow. Show me where Booker did well in an environment that wasn't best modeled as a discrete game.

He beat the corrupt mayor of Newark, last in a long line of corrupt mayors of Newark, as a total outsider.

From which universe are you posting, bub?

The one where everything posted above is correct? Why can’t you engage on the substance of the discussion?

So an alternate universe? Booker lost in his election to the sitting mayor Newark.

And you really don't understand the world if you describe a politician who's a Rhodie and Yale Law grad as a "total outsider".

And given Booker's love to tech and pharma $$$, I'm not sure I want to be singing his praises by calling others 'corrupt'.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Tulsi is the most authentic person in the race, maybe tied w Bernie.

More so than Amtrak Joe? Cory Booker?

Much more so than Biden - what a phoney.

Booker is just authentically .... low iq

Rhodes Scholars are not low iq.

Let’s not go there. Comment stands.

Where exactly are we not going? Into your dreamworld in which a guy who gets a BA and MA from Stanford, where he made the All–Pacific-10 Academic team and was elected senior class president, gets a Rhodes Scholarship to study at Oxford, and graduates from Yale Law School is “low iq”?

NP. Credentialism, especially the ultra-predictable DC type, is the height of middlebrow. Show me where Booker did well in an environment that wasn't best modeled as a discrete game.

He beat the corrupt mayor of Newark, last in a long line of corrupt mayors of Newark, as a total outsider.

From which universe are you posting, bub?

The one where everything posted above is correct? Why can’t you engage on the substance of the discussion?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Tulsi is the most authentic person in the race, maybe tied w Bernie.

More so than Amtrak Joe? Cory Booker?

Much more so than Biden - what a phoney.

Booker is just authentically .... low iq

Rhodes Scholars are not low iq.

Let’s not go there. Comment stands.

Where exactly are we not going? Into your dreamworld in which a guy who gets a BA and MA from Stanford, where he made the All–Pacific-10 Academic team and was elected senior class president, gets a Rhodes Scholarship to study at Oxford, and graduates from Yale Law School is “low iq”?

NP. Credentialism, especially the ultra-predictable DC type, is the height of middlebrow. Show me where Booker did well in an environment that wasn't best modeled as a discrete game.

He beat the corrupt mayor of Newark, last in a long line of corrupt mayors of Newark, as a total outsider.

From which universe are you posting, bub?

How exactly will any of them address the border crisis?

Anonymous wrote:No. Next.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Tulsi is the most authentic person in the race, maybe tied w Bernie.

More so than Amtrak Joe? Cory Booker?

Much more so than Biden - what a phoney.

Booker is just authentically .... low iq

Rhodes Scholars are not low iq.

Let’s not go there. Comment stands.

Where exactly are we not going? Into your dreamworld in which a guy who gets a BA and MA from Stanford, where he made the All–Pacific-10 Academic team and was elected senior class president, gets a Rhodes Scholarship to study at Oxford, and graduates from Yale Law School is “low iq”?

NP. Credentialism, especially the ultra-predictable DC type, is the height of middlebrow. Show me where Booker did well in an environment that wasn't best modeled as a discrete game.

He beat the corrupt mayor of Newark, last in a long line of corrupt mayors of Newark, as a total outsider.