Anonymous wrote:Yes, but not sure how "lucky" we're feeling in our 1st year at DCI. Chinese track students are grouped into required language classes, from Level 1A - Level 3B. My girl cracked the most advanced group. On a summer trip to China, we realized that she can't speak half as well as we thought she could.
I'm not thrilled with this result, or with her for-all-comers English class. She reads 2-3 years ahead of the curriculum but is in class with a bunch of kids who are behind, some far behind. The rest of her 6th grade program is OK.
We're waiting to hear if she's been admitted to privates, hoping for good financial aid.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yes, but not sure how "lucky" we're feeling in our 1st year at DCI. Chinese track students are grouped into required language classes, from Level 1A - Level 3B. My girl cracked the most advanced group. On a summer trip to China, we realized that she can't speak half as well as we thought she could.
I'm not thrilled with this result, or with her for-all-comers English class. She reads 2-3 years ahead of the curriculum but is in class with a bunch of kids who are behind, some far behind. The rest of her 6th grade program is OK.
We're waiting to hear if she's been admitted to privates, hoping for good financial aid.
this is what I fear for McFarland too. by middle school, DC needs a test in language option for kids who are coming up through the feeders and actually learning at or above grade level. I am surprised by all the parents who are so confident that McFarland will be a good school even in 10 years, its getting a weak cohort from feeders. DCI is probably getting a much stronger cohort but it could still take years to before to build a solid school. The behavioral problems are as a big an issue as classes with kids 2 grades behind (why are they even in that school). sorry, but as a parent think middle school is critical to set up for success in HS. I am surprised so many parents are willing to gamble away these difficult years so they can give their kids "immersion"-- and I say that as a parent with a kid at an immersion DCPS. I would love for her to continue with it but not if if means lousy academics overall and non stop behavioral problems.
Anonymous wrote:Yes, but not sure how "lucky" we're feeling in our 1st year at DCI. Chinese track students are grouped into required language classes, from Level 1A - Level 3B. My girl cracked the most advanced group. On a summer trip to China, we realized that she can't speak half as well as we thought she could.
I'm not thrilled with this result, or with her for-all-comers English class. She reads 2-3 years ahead of the curriculum but is in class with a bunch of kids who are behind, some far behind. The rest of her 6th grade program is OK.
We're waiting to hear if she's been admitted to privates, hoping for good financial aid.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Not everybody. A few families with strong IB schools enroll at language immersion charters all the way up, e.g. kids in-boundary for Brent at MV, or in-boundary for Lafayette at YY.
Look, in this low-performing school system nobody much cares if kids who attend an immersion ES for years and years leave barely able to speak the target language. If the kids can pass PARCC tests and the school has a high retention rate, in the eyes of system leaders, all's well.
I've been floored by the abysmal IB Diploma points totals coming out of Banneker and Eastern in recent years, partly because of poor quality language instruction all the way up. DCPS could care less that most of the IB Diploma students in the system fail to earn the Diploma with the lowest possible number of pass points (around 24 points on a 24-45-point scale). I would guess that DCI admins will feel the same way once students start taking the IB Diploma exams.
You need to head for privates or the burbs for quality control in learning languages in this Metro area.
Few WOTP families at DCI. It is filled with families with low-performing IB middle and/or high schools. See the 2018 student commute map.
https://www.dcpcsb.org/dc-international-school-location-map
Anonymous wrote:Not everybody. A few families with strong IB schools enroll at language immersion charters all the way up, e.g. kids in-boundary for Brent at MV, or in-boundary for Lafayette at YY.
Look, in this low-performing school system nobody much cares if kids who attend an immersion ES for years and years leave barely able to speak the target language. If the kids can pass PARCC tests and the school has a high retention rate, in the eyes of system leaders, all's well.
I've been floored by the abysmal IB Diploma points totals coming out of Banneker and Eastern in recent years, partly because of poor quality language instruction all the way up. DCPS could care less that most of the IB Diploma students in the system fail to earn the Diploma with the lowest possible number of pass points (around 24 points on a 24-45-point scale). I would guess that DCI admins will feel the same way once students start taking the IB Diploma exams.
You need to head for privates or the burbs for quality control in learning languages in this Metro area.
Anonymous wrote:Um, most DCI families hardly care about anything but escaping crappy in-boundary schools in this story. Repeat.
That's what's going on at DCI.