Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:People can make whatever arguments they'd like, but having to simply show identification that you are eligible to vote is not suppression. People have to make some effort and this is minimal.
It is suppression, and it’s racist.
https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2017/02/how-voter-id-laws-discriminate-study/517218/
https://www.wired.com/story/voter-id-law-algorithm/
But it seems Republicans are cool with interfering with black people’s ability to vote through whatever means possible.
You aren't giving people of color much credit here, pp.
I can see examining the elimination and relocation of polling places for racial discrimination/disparate impact, but i.d. is basic.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:People can make whatever arguments they'd like, but having to simply show identification that you are eligible to vote is not suppression. People have to make some effort and this is minimal.
It is suppression, and it’s racist.
https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2017/02/how-voter-id-laws-discriminate-study/517218/
https://www.wired.com/story/voter-id-law-algorithm/
But it seems Republicans are cool with interfering with black people’s ability to vote through whatever means possible.
You aren't giving people of color much credit here, pp.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:People can make whatever arguments they'd like, but having to simply show identification that you are eligible to vote is not suppression. People have to make some effort and this is minimal.
+1
Earlier today I had to show a driving license to access a local pool.
Voting is way more important.
Voting is a right and accessing a local pool is not.
And, as a right, we should be sure that those who show up to vote are actually who they say they are.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:People can make whatever arguments they'd like, but having to simply show identification that you are eligible to vote is not suppression. People have to make some effort and this is minimal.
+1
Earlier today I had to show a driving license to access a local pool.
Voting is way more important.
Voting is a right and accessing a local pool is not.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:People can make whatever arguments they'd like, but having to simply show identification that you are eligible to vote is not suppression. People have to make some effort and this is minimal.
+1
Earlier today I had to show a driving license to access a local pool.
Voting is way more important.
Voting is a right and accessing a local pool is not.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:People can make whatever arguments they'd like, but having to simply show identification that you are eligible to vote is not suppression. People have to make some effort and this is minimal.
+1
Earlier today I had to show a driving license to access a local pool.
Voting is way more important.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:People can make whatever arguments they'd like, but having to simply show identification that you are eligible to vote is not suppression. People have to make some effort and this is minimal.
It is suppression, and it’s racist.
https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2017/02/how-voter-id-laws-discriminate-study/517218/
https://www.wired.com/story/voter-id-law-algorithm/
But it seems Republicans are cool with interfering with black people’s ability to vote through whatever means possible.
Anonymous wrote:People can make whatever arguments they'd like, but having to simply show identification that you are eligible to vote is not suppression. People have to make some effort and this is minimal.
Anonymous wrote:People can make whatever arguments they'd like, but having to simply show identification that you are eligible to vote is not suppression. People have to make some effort and this is minimal.
Anonymous wrote:White rage... LOL. Really sets the tone for the interview. Wack job alert.
I hear nothing in terms of substance, just a lot of race based blaming of white people.
Being reasonable is a cover? She complains about scrubbing voter rolls because people move - people are supposed to vote in the location where they live, and only in the location where they live, how is this prejudicial? The election bodies of the governments are charged with the work of enforcing rules and policies, you can't argue that the enforcement of rules and policies are bad just because you don't like the outcome. A citizen's right to vote comes with the responsibility of following the rules to keeping their voter registration updated.
Rights have responsibilities!!!

Anonymous wrote:South Carolina agrees to change voter registration requirements after Democratic officials sue. Almost one million eligible South Carolinians can now register to vote.
https://amp.thestate.com/news/local/crime/article239387333.html?__twitter_impression=true