Anonymous wrote:No. And I’m old enough to know that reason diamonds suddenly got so much bigger is that they’re lab created and now the same amount of money buys a stone three times the size. I think that’s great - no conflict. And if I weren’t around newly engaged couples all the time, I wouldn’t even notice rings at all.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I am very much judging the PP from a few pages ago who bumped a six year old thread to tell everyone she has a four carat yellow diamond and a Cartier band.
+1
Anonymous wrote:No. but they may judge me, I suppose? I just wear a very simple silver band.
Anonymous wrote:I do judge, but I look at the whole look/environment too. I have been judged on my ring before. Mine is a 9ct yellow sapphire set in 18ct yellow and white gold. It's part family heirloom/part reset. I did not wear it much in my 20s but now in my 40s I am enjoying it daily on my right hand. My wedding band is a Cartier Trinity Classic.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I am very much judging the PP from a few pages ago who bumped a six year old thread to tell everyone she has a four carat yellow diamond and a Cartier band.
+1
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Not at all. Also, my wealthiest friends all have smaller rings. Most are vintage or family rings but not all. I’m talking friends with very high net worths or big trust funds.
How do you define high net worth?
Net worth’s over $25 million.
Um, no. There are recognized standards for this and yours clearly isn’t it.
https://www.forbes.com/advisor/investing/financial-advisor/high-net-worth-individual-hnwi/#:~:text=HNWIs%20are%20people%20or%20households,high%2Dnet%2Dworth%20individuals.
Anonymous wrote:I am very much judging the PP from a few pages ago who bumped a six year old thread to tell everyone she has a four carat yellow diamond and a Cartier band.