Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And this, in a nutshell, is a form of antisemtitsm itself on the left. It's not just about tiki torches. It's the indifference to antisemtism, the call for patience and understanding in the face of repeated infractions, and the excuse-making - compared to the attack and negative motives upon Jews who are upset about it.

Just out of curiosity, how much difference do you see between conspiracy theories about the Rothschilds and conspiracy theories about George Soros? A lot of the Soros discourse is wrapped up in blatant anti-Semitism. Are you equally offended by that? We see Soros being blamed for all sorts of things almost daily in the Political Forum. Does that concern you? Where does this fit in your theories about "hard" and "soft" anti-Semitism?

1) The only thing I object to as far as criticism of Soros is that he was blamed as a child for helping Nazis. Is that what you're talking about? From what I've read, he did not actively assist them and I do not hold him responsible.

2) I notice, though, that you turned this around to put me on defensive - a liberal tactic - without responding to my point at all. Do you not agree that you and other posters are insisting we give White the benefit of the doubt, while you assign the most negative motivations to Jews like me who are appalled by him? You said on one post that we "can't access White's brain" to know what he really feels, yet you accused me of not caring about antisemtism - you know nothing of my childhood and what I experienced, including being kicked out of a car and made to walk home when the driver found out I was Jewish* - and said that I'm using this issue as a tool to drive strife between blacks and Jews. Are you willing to acknowledge that you can't "access my brain" and were wrong in saying I don't care about antisemtitism?

* In case youre interested, same thing happened to my sister, after a round of golf. She apparently let it slip she was Jewish, and she ended up having to "schlep" home with a bag full of clubs. So don't say I don't really care about antisemitism. Of all the things you've ever said to me, that's the worst.

Your sister was at least allowed into a country club , thanks in no small part to the fact she could attempt to pass off as white, Anglo or whatever . African Americans have had no such privilege which proves undoubtedly why attempting to always compare yourselves to AAs in such matters is beyond dishonest and stupid .

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:



Yes, the venom with which some posters "hit back" against Jews offended by what they see as antisemtitism is really telling, isn't it? It's sort of proving my point that there is a terrible double standard when it comes to bigotry against blacks, and bigotry against Jews.

Throughout this thread, we see how many liberals will twist and turn to find a way to interpret White's actions in the best light possible. All sorts of rationalizations and defenses, all basically boiling down to: Let's give him the benefit of the doubt. But for Jews who see associating with and donating to a virulent anti-Semite, advancing an antisemtitc conspiracy theory (I bet he heard it from Farrakhan), and showing indifference to - and even denial of - the horrors of the Holocaust as revealing his antisemitism are given anything BUT the benefit of the doubt! Negative motives are assigned to their interpretation.

And this, in a nutshell, is a form of antisemtitsm itself on the left. It's not just about tiki torches. It's the indifference to antisemtism, the call for patience and understanding in the face of repeated infractions, and the excuse-making - compared to the attack and negative motives upon Jews who are upset about it.

Your insistence on camparing yourselves to African Americans, coopting ans hiding behind their struggles ( past and present ) makes you lose more sympathy than you think , your persecution complex just doesn't jibe with reality no matter what you try to tell yourself

No one is co-opting or hiding behind the struggles of African-Americans. The Jews have faced the same thing in their history and it is taught in their homes and synagogues on a daily and weekly basis to never forget and to always stick up for those being persecuted and treated unjustly. In the US, that has been African-Americans since the founding of the country. You may not want to believe it, but the ties between Jews and say the NAACP and the Jews and Civil Rights leaders and the Jews and non-profits that do work in communities of need has been long-standing.

Are you seriously suggesting that Jews haven't been enslaved, that Jews haven't been persecuted, that Jews haven't been discriminated against, and that Jews haven't been slaughtered because of their religion?

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And this, in a nutshell, is a form of antisemtitsm itself on the left. It's not just about tiki torches. It's the indifference to antisemtism, the call for patience and understanding in the face of repeated infractions, and the excuse-making - compared to the attack and negative motives upon Jews who are upset about it.

Just out of curiosity, how much difference do you see between conspiracy theories about the Rothschilds and conspiracy theories about George Soros? A lot of the Soros discourse is wrapped up in blatant anti-Semitism. Are you equally offended by that? We see Soros being blamed for all sorts of things almost daily in the Political Forum. Does that concern you? Where does this fit in your theories about "hard" and "soft" anti-Semitism?

1) The only thing I object to as far as criticism of Soros is that he was blamed as a child for helping Nazis. Is that what you're talking about? From what I've read, he did not actively assist them and I do not hold him responsible.

2) I notice, though, that you turned this around to put me on defensive - a liberal tactic - without responding to my point at all. Do you not agree that you and other posters are insisting we give White the benefit of the doubt, while you assign the most negative motivations to Jews like me who are appalled by him? You said on one post that we "can't access White's brain" to know what he really feels, yet you accused me of not caring about antisemtism - you know nothing of my childhood and what I experienced, including being kicked out of a car and made to walk home when the driver found out I was Jewish* - and said that I'm using this issue as a tool to drive strife between blacks and Jews. Are you willing to acknowledge that you can't "access my brain" and were wrong in saying I don't care about antisemtitism?

* In case youre interested, same thing happened to my sister, after a round of golf. She apparently let it slip she was Jewish, and she ended up having to "schlep" home with a bag full of clubs. So don't say I don't really care about antisemitism. Of all the things you've ever said to me, that's the worst.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:



Yes, the venom with which some posters "hit back" against Jews offended by what they see as antisemtitism is really telling, isn't it? It's sort of proving my point that there is a terrible double standard when it comes to bigotry against blacks, and bigotry against Jews.

Throughout this thread, we see how many liberals will twist and turn to find a way to interpret White's actions in the best light possible. All sorts of rationalizations and defenses, all basically boiling down to: Let's give him the benefit of the doubt. But for Jews who see associating with and donating to a virulent anti-Semite, advancing an antisemtitc conspiracy theory (I bet he heard it from Farrakhan), and showing indifference to - and even denial of - the horrors of the Holocaust as revealing his antisemitism are given anything BUT the benefit of the doubt! Negative motives are assigned to their interpretation.

And this, in a nutshell, is a form of antisemtitsm itself on the left. It's not just about tiki torches. It's the indifference to antisemtism, the call for patience and understanding in the face of repeated infractions, and the excuse-making - compared to the attack and negative motives upon Jews who are upset about it.

Your insistence on camparing yourselves to African Americans, coopting ans hiding behind their struggles ( past and present ) makes you lose more sympathy than you think , your persecution complex just doesn't jibe with reality no matter what you try to tell yourself

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Are you kidding me here? Why are you defending someone who has expressed such retrograde, abhorrent views and at every public opportunity has doubled down on them?

Because no such thing has happened. Get back to me when you are ready to discuss reality.

I'm completely ready to "discuss reality." Here is what White said: “And D.C. keep talking about, ‘We a resilient city.’ And that’s a model based off the Rothschilds controlling the climate to create natural disasters they can pay for to own the cities, man. Be careful.”

I'm dumbfounded that anyone with even the slightest awareness of history could suggest this is not anti-Semitic.

It is only anti-Semitic if you know that the Rothschilds are Jewish and are part of historical anti-Semitic conspiracy theories. If you don't know such things -- and it appears that White didn't -- it is no different than as if he had blamed the weather on the Smith family.

Yes, it is hard to believe that he was unaware of the religion of the Rothschilds, but I have run into other DC natives -- some quite well educated -- who also didn't know anything about the Rothschilds. You are confusing ignorance with anti-Semitism.

Moreover, White has not espoused his moronic conspiracy theory "at every public opportunity" and nor has he "doubled down on them". To the contrary, he apologized and engaged in an effort to educate himself about anti-Semitism. Given your misunderstanding of White's actions, it appears that White may not be the only one speaking from a position of ignorance.

I don't misunderstand anything. Hate speech is hate speech. Ignorance is not a justification for disseminating vile conspiracy theories, especially about an ethnic or racial group. And his behavior at the Holocaust Museum was worse than doubling down. He walked out on his tour guide after making attempts to justify Nazi barbarism. That's not "an effort to educate himself about anti-Semitism."

Why are you defending him?

DP point to me the exact phrase where Mr White explicitly blames Jews for the climate manipulation .

The Rothschilds were a wealthy Jewish family from Germany. There has been an antisemetic conspiracy theory surrounding the Rothschilds which emanated, I believe from the Nazis since the 1930’s or thereabouts. It is an age old antisemetic trope to blame the Rothschilds for all the bad in the world or to say thaT they control things. Anyone who knows anything about antisemetism knows that invoking the Rothschilds name is the same as saying the Jews. This could probably be explained better, but I gave it a shot.

He could've said the same thing about the koch brothers and there would be No gesticulation from you , you're well within your right to draw or attempt to parallels between his blaming the Rothschild for climate manipulation and anti Semitism , but what you won't do is pretend that you have the monopoly of the truth and that there's no difference between someone explicitly saying stuff like Jews are responsible for climate manipulation or Jews will not replace us and someone blaming a bunch of wealthy who happen to be Jewish ( a fact that he may or may not have known ) for climate manipulation.

Jews are not above reproach and criticizing someone who also happens to be Jewish , or spreading conspiracy theories about someone who happens to be Jewish and anti Semitism isn't mutually exclusive . From the onset some of you decided that it was anti Semitism and were certainly not expecting to be met with vigorous counter arguments that although not necsssrily defending Mr White, sought to push back against this troubling mindset that if you Jews deem something anti Semite then it must be so . IT IS NOT

So you're pissed that "we Jews" have decided it's antisemtitsm, yet you in your superior wisdom have decided IT IS NOT? So why do you get to decide?

And does it not concern you that (some) Jews find his remarks and actions offensive? For example, I once used "the" when I said "the blacks" and was criticized, soundly, for saying "the." I don't get why it's racist, because I refer to the Jews in that context plenty of times. Yet, because I was told it IS offensive, I never did it again. Why? Because I don't want to refer to black people in a way that (some at least) find offensive, even if I myself don't see that it is.

Amazing how the anger and pushback is being leveled at Jews who dare open their mouths when they see obvious antisemtitsm. It should be Trayon White you're condemning, not "us Jews."

There is no point in paying any lip service to this anti Semitic poster pp. Don’t waste your time. They obviously resent Jews and it makes him angry that Jews recognize this in both him and others and are not willing to give a pass. I am assuming the poster is male, but I could be wrong.

Yes, the venom with which some posters "hit back" against Jews offended by what they see as antisemtitism is really telling, isn't it? It's sort of proving my point that there is a terrible double standard when it comes to bigotry against blacks, and bigotry against Jews.

Throughout this thread, we see how many liberals will twist and turn to find a way to interpret White's actions in the best light possible. All sorts of rationalizations and defenses, all basically boiling down to: Let's give him the benefit of the doubt. But for Jews who see associating with and donating to a virulent anti-Semite, advancing an antisemtitc conspiracy theory (I bet he heard it from Farrakhan), and showing indifference to - and even denial of - the horrors of the Holocaust as revealing his antisemitism are given anything BUT the benefit of the doubt! Negative motives are assigned to their interpretation.

And this, in a nutshell, is a form of antisemtitsm itself on the left. It's not just about tiki torches. It's the indifference to antisemtism, the call for patience and understanding in the face of repeated infractions, and the excuse-making - compared to the attack and negative motives upon Jews who are upset about it.

Your insistence on camparing yourselves to African Americans, coopting ans hiding behind their struggles ( past and present ) makes you lose more sympathy than you think , your persecution complex just doesn't jibe with reality no matter what you try to tell yourself

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And this, in a nutshell, is a form of antisemtitsm itself on the left. It's not just about tiki torches. It's the indifference to antisemtism, the call for patience and understanding in the face of repeated infractions, and the excuse-making - compared to the attack and negative motives upon Jews who are upset about it.

Just out of curiosity, how much difference do you see between conspiracy theories about the Rothschilds and conspiracy theories about George Soros? A lot of the Soros discourse is wrapped up in blatant anti-Semitism. Are you equally offended by that? We see Soros being blamed for all sorts of things almost daily in the Political Forum. Does that concern you? Where does this fit in your theories about "hard" and "soft" anti-Semitism?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Are you kidding me here? Why are you defending someone who has expressed such retrograde, abhorrent views and at every public opportunity has doubled down on them?

Because no such thing has happened. Get back to me when you are ready to discuss reality.

I'm completely ready to "discuss reality." Here is what White said: “And D.C. keep talking about, ‘We a resilient city.’ And that’s a model based off the Rothschilds controlling the climate to create natural disasters they can pay for to own the cities, man. Be careful.”

I'm dumbfounded that anyone with even the slightest awareness of history could suggest this is not anti-Semitic.

It is only anti-Semitic if you know that the Rothschilds are Jewish and are part of historical anti-Semitic conspiracy theories. If you don't know such things -- and it appears that White didn't -- it is no different than as if he had blamed the weather on the Smith family.

Yes, it is hard to believe that he was unaware of the religion of the Rothschilds, but I have run into other DC natives -- some quite well educated -- who also didn't know anything about the Rothschilds. You are confusing ignorance with anti-Semitism.

Moreover, White has not espoused his moronic conspiracy theory "at every public opportunity" and nor has he "doubled down on them". To the contrary, he apologized and engaged in an effort to educate himself about anti-Semitism. Given your misunderstanding of White's actions, it appears that White may not be the only one speaking from a position of ignorance.

I don't misunderstand anything. Hate speech is hate speech. Ignorance is not a justification for disseminating vile conspiracy theories, especially about an ethnic or racial group. And his behavior at the Holocaust Museum was worse than doubling down. He walked out on his tour guide after making attempts to justify Nazi barbarism. That's not "an effort to educate himself about anti-Semitism."

Why are you defending him?

DP point to me the exact phrase where Mr White explicitly blames Jews for the climate manipulation .

The Rothschilds were a wealthy Jewish family from Germany. There has been an antisemetic conspiracy theory surrounding the Rothschilds which emanated, I believe from the Nazis since the 1930’s or thereabouts. It is an age old antisemetic trope to blame the Rothschilds for all the bad in the world or to say thaT they control things. Anyone who knows anything about antisemetism knows that invoking the Rothschilds name is the same as saying the Jews. This could probably be explained better, but I gave it a shot.

He could've said the same thing about the koch brothers and there would be No gesticulation from you , you're well within your right to draw or attempt to parallels between his blaming the Rothschild for climate manipulation and anti Semitism , but what you won't do is pretend that you have the monopoly of the truth and that there's no difference between someone explicitly saying stuff like Jews are responsible for climate manipulation or Jews will not replace us and someone blaming a bunch of wealthy who happen to be Jewish ( a fact that he may or may not have known ) for climate manipulation.

Jews are not above reproach and criticizing someone who also happens to be Jewish , or spreading conspiracy theories about someone who happens to be Jewish and anti Semitism isn't mutually exclusive . From the onset some of you decided that it was anti Semitism and were certainly not expecting to be met with vigorous counter arguments that although not necsssrily defending Mr White, sought to push back against this troubling mindset that if you Jews deem something anti Semite then it must be so . IT IS NOT

So you're pissed that "we Jews" have decided it's antisemtitsm, yet you in your superior wisdom have decided IT IS NOT? So why do you get to decide?

And does it not concern you that (some) Jews find his remarks and actions offensive? For example, I once used "the" when I said "the blacks" and was criticized, soundly, for saying "the." I don't get why it's racist, because I refer to the Jews in that context plenty of times. Yet, because I was told it IS offensive, I never did it again. Why? Because I don't want to refer to black people in a way that (some at least) find offensive, even if I myself don't see that it is.

Amazing how the anger and pushback is being leveled at Jews who dare open their mouths when they see obvious antisemtitsm. It should be Trayon White you're condemning, not "us Jews."

There is no point in paying any lip service to this anti Semitic poster pp. Don’t waste your time. They obviously resent Jews and it makes him angry that Jews recognize this in both him and others and are not willing to give a pass. I am assuming the poster is male, but I could be wrong.

If pushing back against the notion that something is anti Semitic because a bunch of people have decided that it is makes me anti Semitic . I can assure I won't lose any second of my sleep . Try harder you're getting sad and pathetic

So the next time black people claim something is racist, I should tell them " you blacks" don't get to decide what is racist?? Because that's exactly what you said, just addressed to Jews.

Anonymous wrote:And this, in a nutshell, is a form of antisemtitsm itself on the left. It's not just about tiki torches. It's the indifference to antisemtism, the call for patience and understanding in the face of repeated infractions, and the excuse-making - compared to the attack and negative motives upon Jews who are upset about it.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Are you kidding me here? Why are you defending someone who has expressed such retrograde, abhorrent views and at every public opportunity has doubled down on them?

Because no such thing has happened. Get back to me when you are ready to discuss reality.

I'm completely ready to "discuss reality." Here is what White said: “And D.C. keep talking about, ‘We a resilient city.’ And that’s a model based off the Rothschilds controlling the climate to create natural disasters they can pay for to own the cities, man. Be careful.”

I'm dumbfounded that anyone with even the slightest awareness of history could suggest this is not anti-Semitic.

It is only anti-Semitic if you know that the Rothschilds are Jewish and are part of historical anti-Semitic conspiracy theories. If you don't know such things -- and it appears that White didn't -- it is no different than as if he had blamed the weather on the Smith family.

Yes, it is hard to believe that he was unaware of the religion of the Rothschilds, but I have run into other DC natives -- some quite well educated -- who also didn't know anything about the Rothschilds. You are confusing ignorance with anti-Semitism.

Moreover, White has not espoused his moronic conspiracy theory "at every public opportunity" and nor has he "doubled down on them". To the contrary, he apologized and engaged in an effort to educate himself about anti-Semitism. Given your misunderstanding of White's actions, it appears that White may not be the only one speaking from a position of ignorance.

I don't misunderstand anything. Hate speech is hate speech. Ignorance is not a justification for disseminating vile conspiracy theories, especially about an ethnic or racial group. And his behavior at the Holocaust Museum was worse than doubling down. He walked out on his tour guide after making attempts to justify Nazi barbarism. That's not "an effort to educate himself about anti-Semitism."

Why are you defending him?

DP point to me the exact phrase where Mr White explicitly blames Jews for the climate manipulation .

The Rothschilds were a wealthy Jewish family from Germany. There has been an antisemetic conspiracy theory surrounding the Rothschilds which emanated, I believe from the Nazis since the 1930’s or thereabouts. It is an age old antisemetic trope to blame the Rothschilds for all the bad in the world or to say thaT they control things. Anyone who knows anything about antisemetism knows that invoking the Rothschilds name is the same as saying the Jews. This could probably be explained better, but I gave it a shot.

He could've said the same thing about the koch brothers and there would be No gesticulation from you , you're well within your right to draw or attempt to parallels between his blaming the Rothschild for climate manipulation and anti Semitism , but what you won't do is pretend that you have the monopoly of the truth and that there's no difference between someone explicitly saying stuff like Jews are responsible for climate manipulation or Jews will not replace us and someone blaming a bunch of wealthy who happen to be Jewish ( a fact that he may or may not have known ) for climate manipulation.

Jews are not above reproach and criticizing someone who also happens to be Jewish , or spreading conspiracy theories about someone who happens to be Jewish and anti Semitism isn't mutually exclusive . From the onset some of you decided that it was anti Semitism and were certainly not expecting to be met with vigorous counter arguments that although not necsssrily defending Mr White, sought to push back against this troubling mindset that if you Jews deem something anti Semite then it must be so . IT IS NOT

So you're pissed that "we Jews" have decided it's antisemtitsm, yet you in your superior wisdom have decided IT IS NOT? So why do you get to decide?

And does it not concern you that (some) Jews find his remarks and actions offensive? For example, I once used "the" when I said "the blacks" and was criticized, soundly, for saying "the." I don't get why it's racist, because I refer to the Jews in that context plenty of times. Yet, because I was told it IS offensive, I never did it again. Why? Because I don't want to refer to black people in a way that (some at least) find offensive, even if I myself don't see that it is.

Amazing how the anger and pushback is being leveled at Jews who dare open their mouths when they see obvious antisemtitsm. It should be Trayon White you're condemning, not "us Jews."

There is no point in paying any lip service to this anti Semitic poster pp. Don’t waste your time. They obviously resent Jews and it makes him angry that Jews recognize this in both him and others and are not willing to give a pass. I am assuming the poster is male, but I could be wrong.

Yes, the venom with which some posters "hit back" against Jews offended by what they see as antisemtitism is really telling, isn't it? It's sort of proving my point that there is a terrible double standard when it comes to bigotry against blacks, and bigotry against Jews.

Throughout this thread, we see how many liberals will twist and turn to find a way to interpret White's actions in the best light possible. All sorts of rationalizations and defenses, all basically boiling down to: Let's give him the benefit of the doubt. But for Jews who see associating with and donating to a virulent anti-Semite, advancing an antisemtitc conspiracy theory (I bet he heard it from Farrakhan), and showing indifference to - and even denial of - the horrors of the Holocaust as revealing his antisemitism are given anything BUT the benefit of the doubt! Negative motives are assigned to their interpretation.

And this, in a nutshell, is a form of antisemtitsm itself on the left. It's not just about tiki torches. It's the indifference to antisemtism, the call for patience and understanding in the face of repeated infractions, and the excuse-making - compared to the attack and negative motives upon Jews who are upset about it.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Are you kidding me here? Why are you defending someone who has expressed such retrograde, abhorrent views and at every public opportunity has doubled down on them?

Because no such thing has happened. Get back to me when you are ready to discuss reality.

I'm completely ready to "discuss reality." Here is what White said: “And D.C. keep talking about, ‘We a resilient city.’ And that’s a model based off the Rothschilds controlling the climate to create natural disasters they can pay for to own the cities, man. Be careful.”

I'm dumbfounded that anyone with even the slightest awareness of history could suggest this is not anti-Semitic.

It is only anti-Semitic if you know that the Rothschilds are Jewish and are part of historical anti-Semitic conspiracy theories. If you don't know such things -- and it appears that White didn't -- it is no different than as if he had blamed the weather on the Smith family.

Yes, it is hard to believe that he was unaware of the religion of the Rothschilds, but I have run into other DC natives -- some quite well educated -- who also didn't know anything about the Rothschilds. You are confusing ignorance with anti-Semitism.

Moreover, White has not espoused his moronic conspiracy theory "at every public opportunity" and nor has he "doubled down on them". To the contrary, he apologized and engaged in an effort to educate himself about anti-Semitism. Given your misunderstanding of White's actions, it appears that White may not be the only one speaking from a position of ignorance.

I don't misunderstand anything. Hate speech is hate speech. Ignorance is not a justification for disseminating vile conspiracy theories, especially about an ethnic or racial group. And his behavior at the Holocaust Museum was worse than doubling down. He walked out on his tour guide after making attempts to justify Nazi barbarism. That's not "an effort to educate himself about anti-Semitism."

Why are you defending him?

DP point to me the exact phrase where Mr White explicitly blames Jews for the climate manipulation .

The Rothschilds were a wealthy Jewish family from Germany. There has been an antisemetic conspiracy theory surrounding the Rothschilds which emanated, I believe from the Nazis since the 1930’s or thereabouts. It is an age old antisemetic trope to blame the Rothschilds for all the bad in the world or to say thaT they control things. Anyone who knows anything about antisemetism knows that invoking the Rothschilds name is the same as saying the Jews. This could probably be explained better, but I gave it a shot.

He could've said the same thing about the koch brothers and there would be No gesticulation from you , you're well within your right to draw or attempt to parallels between his blaming the Rothschild for climate manipulation and anti Semitism , but what you won't do is pretend that you have the monopoly of the truth and that there's no difference between someone explicitly saying stuff like Jews are responsible for climate manipulation or Jews will not replace us and someone blaming a bunch of wealthy who happen to be Jewish ( a fact that he may or may not have known ) for climate manipulation.

Jews are not above reproach and criticizing someone who also happens to be Jewish , or spreading conspiracy theories about someone who happens to be Jewish and anti Semitism isn't mutually exclusive . From the onset some of you decided that it was anti Semitism and were certainly not expecting to be met with vigorous counter arguments that although not necsssrily defending Mr White, sought to push back against this troubling mindset that if you Jews deem something anti Semite then it must be so . IT IS NOT

So you're pissed that "we Jews" have decided it's antisemtitsm, yet you in your superior wisdom have decided IT IS NOT? So why do you get to decide?

And does it not concern you that (some) Jews find his remarks and actions offensive? For example, I once used "the" when I said "the blacks" and was criticized, soundly, for saying "the." I don't get why it's racist, because I refer to the Jews in that context plenty of times. Yet, because I was told it IS offensive, I never did it again. Why? Because I don't want to refer to black people in a way that (some at least) find offensive, even if I myself don't see that it is.

Amazing how the anger and pushback is being leveled at Jews who dare open their mouths when they see obvious antisemtitsm. It should be Trayon White you're condemning, not "us Jews."

I or any level headed adult should condemn blatant racism , islamophobia or anti Semitism when it's clearly established not when a group decides or seeks to dictates when it occurs , even if and when the evidence does NOT prove it

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Are you kidding me here? Why are you defending someone who has expressed such retrograde, abhorrent views and at every public opportunity has doubled down on them?

Because no such thing has happened. Get back to me when you are ready to discuss reality.

I'm completely ready to "discuss reality." Here is what White said: “And D.C. keep talking about, ‘We a resilient city.’ And that’s a model based off the Rothschilds controlling the climate to create natural disasters they can pay for to own the cities, man. Be careful.”

I'm dumbfounded that anyone with even the slightest awareness of history could suggest this is not anti-Semitic.

It is only anti-Semitic if you know that the Rothschilds are Jewish and are part of historical anti-Semitic conspiracy theories. If you don't know such things -- and it appears that White didn't -- it is no different than as if he had blamed the weather on the Smith family.

Yes, it is hard to believe that he was unaware of the religion of the Rothschilds, but I have run into other DC natives -- some quite well educated -- who also didn't know anything about the Rothschilds. You are confusing ignorance with anti-Semitism.

Moreover, White has not espoused his moronic conspiracy theory "at every public opportunity" and nor has he "doubled down on them". To the contrary, he apologized and engaged in an effort to educate himself about anti-Semitism. Given your misunderstanding of White's actions, it appears that White may not be the only one speaking from a position of ignorance.

I don't misunderstand anything. Hate speech is hate speech. Ignorance is not a justification for disseminating vile conspiracy theories, especially about an ethnic or racial group. And his behavior at the Holocaust Museum was worse than doubling down. He walked out on his tour guide after making attempts to justify Nazi barbarism. That's not "an effort to educate himself about anti-Semitism."

Why are you defending him?

DP point to me the exact phrase where Mr White explicitly blames Jews for the climate manipulation .

The Rothschilds were a wealthy Jewish family from Germany. There has been an antisemetic conspiracy theory surrounding the Rothschilds which emanated, I believe from the Nazis since the 1930’s or thereabouts. It is an age old antisemetic trope to blame the Rothschilds for all the bad in the world or to say thaT they control things. Anyone who knows anything about antisemetism knows that invoking the Rothschilds name is the same as saying the Jews. This could probably be explained better, but I gave it a shot.

He could've said the same thing about the koch brothers and there would be No gesticulation from you , you're well within your right to draw or attempt to parallels between his blaming the Rothschild for climate manipulation and anti Semitism , but what you won't do is pretend that you have the monopoly of the truth and that there's no difference between someone explicitly saying stuff like Jews are responsible for climate manipulation or Jews will not replace us and someone blaming a bunch of wealthy who happen to be Jewish ( a fact that he may or may not have known ) for climate manipulation.

Jews are not above reproach and criticizing someone who also happens to be Jewish , or spreading conspiracy theories about someone who happens to be Jewish and anti Semitism isn't mutually exclusive . From the onset some of you decided that it was anti Semitism and were certainly not expecting to be met with vigorous counter arguments that although not necsssrily defending Mr White, sought to push back against this troubling mindset that if you Jews deem something anti Semite then it must be so . IT IS NOT

So you're pissed that "we Jews" have decided it's antisemtitsm, yet you in your superior wisdom have decided IT IS NOT? So why do you get to decide?

And does it not concern you that (some) Jews find his remarks and actions offensive? For example, I once used "the" when I said "the blacks" and was criticized, soundly, for saying "the." I don't get why it's racist, because I refer to the Jews in that context plenty of times. Yet, because I was told it IS offensive, I never did it again. Why? Because I don't want to refer to black people in a way that (some at least) find offensive, even if I myself don't see that it is.

Amazing how the anger and pushback is being leveled at Jews who dare open their mouths when they see obvious antisemtitsm. It should be Trayon White you're condemning, not "us Jews."

There is no point in paying any lip service to this anti Semitic poster pp. Don’t waste your time. They obviously resent Jews and it makes him angry that Jews recognize this in both him and others and are not willing to give a pass. I am assuming the poster is male, but I could be wrong.

If pushing back against the notion that something is anti Semitic because a bunch of people have decided that it is makes me anti Semitic . I can assure I won't lose any second of my sleep . Try harder you're getting sad and pathetic

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Are you kidding me here? Why are you defending someone who has expressed such retrograde, abhorrent views and at every public opportunity has doubled down on them?

Because no such thing has happened. Get back to me when you are ready to discuss reality.

I'm completely ready to "discuss reality." Here is what White said: “And D.C. keep talking about, ‘We a resilient city.’ And that’s a model based off the Rothschilds controlling the climate to create natural disasters they can pay for to own the cities, man. Be careful.”

I'm dumbfounded that anyone with even the slightest awareness of history could suggest this is not anti-Semitic.

It is only anti-Semitic if you know that the Rothschilds are Jewish and are part of historical anti-Semitic conspiracy theories. If you don't know such things -- and it appears that White didn't -- it is no different than as if he had blamed the weather on the Smith family.

Yes, it is hard to believe that he was unaware of the religion of the Rothschilds, but I have run into other DC natives -- some quite well educated -- who also didn't know anything about the Rothschilds. You are confusing ignorance with anti-Semitism.

Moreover, White has not espoused his moronic conspiracy theory "at every public opportunity" and nor has he "doubled down on them". To the contrary, he apologized and engaged in an effort to educate himself about anti-Semitism. Given your misunderstanding of White's actions, it appears that White may not be the only one speaking from a position of ignorance.

I don't misunderstand anything. Hate speech is hate speech. Ignorance is not a justification for disseminating vile conspiracy theories, especially about an ethnic or racial group. And his behavior at the Holocaust Museum was worse than doubling down. He walked out on his tour guide after making attempts to justify Nazi barbarism. That's not "an effort to educate himself about anti-Semitism."

Why are you defending him?

DP point to me the exact phrase where Mr White explicitly blames Jews for the climate manipulation .

The Rothschilds were a wealthy Jewish family from Germany. There has been an antisemetic conspiracy theory surrounding the Rothschilds which emanated, I believe from the Nazis since the 1930’s or thereabouts. It is an age old antisemetic trope to blame the Rothschilds for all the bad in the world or to say thaT they control things. Anyone who knows anything about antisemetism knows that invoking the Rothschilds name is the same as saying the Jews. This could probably be explained better, but I gave it a shot.

He could've said the same thing about the koch brothers and there would be No gesticulation from you , you're well within your right to draw or attempt to parallels between his blaming the Rothschild for climate manipulation and anti Semitism , but what you won't do is pretend that you have the monopoly of the truth and that there's no difference between someone explicitly saying stuff like Jews are responsible for climate manipulation or Jews will not replace us and someone blaming a bunch of wealthy who happen to be Jewish ( a fact that he may or may not have known ) for climate manipulation.

Jews are not above reproach and criticizing someone who also happens to be Jewish , or spreading conspiracy theories about someone who happens to be Jewish and anti Semitism isn't mutually exclusive . From the onset some of you decided that it was anti Semitism and were certainly not expecting to be met with vigorous counter arguments that although not necsssrily defending Mr White, sought to push back against this troubling mindset that if you Jews deem something anti Semite then it must be so . IT IS NOT

So you're pissed that "we Jews" have decided it's antisemtitsm, yet you in your superior wisdom have decided IT IS NOT? So why do you get to decide?

And does it not concern you that (some) Jews find his remarks and actions offensive? For example, I once used "the" when I said "the blacks" and was criticized, soundly, for saying "the." I don't get why it's racist, because I refer to the Jews in that context plenty of times. Yet, because I was told it IS offensive, I never did it again. Why? Because I don't want to refer to black people in a way that (some at least) find offensive, even if I myself don't see that it is.

Amazing how the anger and pushback is being leveled at Jews who dare open their mouths when they see obvious antisemtitsm. It should be Trayon White you're condemning, not "us Jews."

There is no point in paying any lip service to this anti Semitic poster pp. Don’t waste your time. They obviously resent Jews and it makes him angry that Jews recognize this in both him and others and are not willing to give a pass. I am assuming the poster is male, but I could be wrong.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Are you kidding me here? Why are you defending someone who has expressed such retrograde, abhorrent views and at every public opportunity has doubled down on them?

Because no such thing has happened. Get back to me when you are ready to discuss reality.

I'm completely ready to "discuss reality." Here is what White said: “And D.C. keep talking about, ‘We a resilient city.’ And that’s a model based off the Rothschilds controlling the climate to create natural disasters they can pay for to own the cities, man. Be careful.”

I'm dumbfounded that anyone with even the slightest awareness of history could suggest this is not anti-Semitic.

It is only anti-Semitic if you know that the Rothschilds are Jewish and are part of historical anti-Semitic conspiracy theories. If you don't know such things -- and it appears that White didn't -- it is no different than as if he had blamed the weather on the Smith family.

Yes, it is hard to believe that he was unaware of the religion of the Rothschilds, but I have run into other DC natives -- some quite well educated -- who also didn't know anything about the Rothschilds. You are confusing ignorance with anti-Semitism.

Moreover, White has not espoused his moronic conspiracy theory "at every public opportunity" and nor has he "doubled down on them". To the contrary, he apologized and engaged in an effort to educate himself about anti-Semitism. Given your misunderstanding of White's actions, it appears that White may not be the only one speaking from a position of ignorance.

I don't misunderstand anything. Hate speech is hate speech. Ignorance is not a justification for disseminating vile conspiracy theories, especially about an ethnic or racial group. And his behavior at the Holocaust Museum was worse than doubling down. He walked out on his tour guide after making attempts to justify Nazi barbarism. That's not "an effort to educate himself about anti-Semitism."

Why are you defending him?

DP point to me the exact phrase where Mr White explicitly blames Jews for the climate manipulation .

The Rothschilds were a wealthy Jewish family from Germany. There has been an antisemetic conspiracy theory surrounding the Rothschilds which emanated, I believe from the Nazis since the 1930’s or thereabouts. It is an age old antisemetic trope to blame the Rothschilds for all the bad in the world or to say thaT they control things. Anyone who knows anything about antisemetism knows that invoking the Rothschilds name is the same as saying the Jews. This could probably be explained better, but I gave it a shot.

He could've said the same thing about the koch brothers and there would be No gesticulation from you , you're well within your right to draw or attempt to parallels between his blaming the Rothschild for climate manipulation and anti Semitism , but what you won't do is pretend that you have the monopoly of the truth and that there's no difference between someone explicitly saying stuff like Jews are responsible for climate manipulation or Jews will not replace us and someone blaming a bunch of wealthy who happen to be Jewish ( a fact that he may or may not have known ) for climate manipulation.

Jews are not above reproach and criticizing someone who also happens to be Jewish , or spreading conspiracy theories about someone who happens to be Jewish and anti Semitism isn't mutually exclusive . From the onset some of you decided that it was anti Semitism and were certainly not expecting to be met with vigorous counter arguments that although not necsssrily defending Mr White, sought to push back against this troubling mindset that if you Jews deem something anti Semite then it must be so . IT IS NOT

So you're pissed that "we Jews" have decided it's antisemtitsm, yet you in your superior wisdom have decided IT IS NOT? So why do you get to decide?

And does it not concern you that (some) Jews find his remarks and actions offensive? For example, I once used "the" when I said "the blacks" and was criticized, soundly, for saying "the." I don't get why it's racist, because I refer to the Jews in that context plenty of times. Yet, because I was told it IS offensive, I never did it again. Why? Because I don't want to refer to black people in a way that (some at least) find offensive, even if I myself don't see that it is.

Amazing how the anger and pushback is being leveled at Jews who dare open their mouths when they see obvious antisemtitsm. It should be Trayon White you're condemning, not "us Jews."

There is no point in paying any lip service to this anti Semitic poster pp. Don’t waste your time. They obviously resent Jews and it makes him angry that Jews recognize this in both him and others and are not willing to give a pass. I am assuming the poster is male, but I could be wrong.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Are you kidding me here? Why are you defending someone who has expressed such retrograde, abhorrent views and at every public opportunity has doubled down on them?

Because no such thing has happened. Get back to me when you are ready to discuss reality.

I'm completely ready to "discuss reality." Here is what White said: “And D.C. keep talking about, ‘We a resilient city.’ And that’s a model based off the Rothschilds controlling the climate to create natural disasters they can pay for to own the cities, man. Be careful.”

I'm dumbfounded that anyone with even the slightest awareness of history could suggest this is not anti-Semitic.

It is only anti-Semitic if you know that the Rothschilds are Jewish and are part of historical anti-Semitic conspiracy theories. If you don't know such things -- and it appears that White didn't -- it is no different than as if he had blamed the weather on the Smith family.

Yes, it is hard to believe that he was unaware of the religion of the Rothschilds, but I have run into other DC natives -- some quite well educated -- who also didn't know anything about the Rothschilds. You are confusing ignorance with anti-Semitism.

Moreover, White has not espoused his moronic conspiracy theory "at every public opportunity" and nor has he "doubled down on them". To the contrary, he apologized and engaged in an effort to educate himself about anti-Semitism. Given your misunderstanding of White's actions, it appears that White may not be the only one speaking from a position of ignorance.

I don't misunderstand anything. Hate speech is hate speech. Ignorance is not a justification for disseminating vile conspiracy theories, especially about an ethnic or racial group. And his behavior at the Holocaust Museum was worse than doubling down. He walked out on his tour guide after making attempts to justify Nazi barbarism. That's not "an effort to educate himself about anti-Semitism."

Why are you defending him?

DP point to me the exact phrase where Mr White explicitly blames Jews for the climate manipulation .

The Rothschilds were a wealthy Jewish family from Germany. There has been an antisemetic conspiracy theory surrounding the Rothschilds which emanated, I believe from the Nazis since the 1930’s or thereabouts. It is an age old antisemetic trope to blame the Rothschilds for all the bad in the world or to say thaT they control things. Anyone who knows anything about antisemetism knows that invoking the Rothschilds name is the same as saying the Jews. This could probably be explained better, but I gave it a shot.

He could've said the same thing about the koch brothers and there would be No gesticulation from you , you're well within your right to draw or attempt to parallels between his blaming the Rothschild for climate manipulation and anti Semitism , but what you won't do is pretend that you have the monopoly of the truth and that there's no difference between someone explicitly saying stuff like Jews are responsible for climate manipulation or Jews will not replace us and someone blaming a bunch of wealthy who happen to be Jewish ( a fact that he may or may not have known ) for climate manipulation.

Jews are not above reproach and criticizing someone who also happens to be Jewish , or spreading conspiracy theories about someone who happens to be Jewish and anti Semitism isn't mutually exclusive . From the onset some of you decided that it was anti Semitism and were certainly not expecting to be met with vigorous counter arguments that although not necsssrily defending Mr White, sought to push back against this troubling mindset that if you Jews deem something anti Semite then it must be so . IT IS NOT

So you're pissed that "we Jews" have decided it's antisemtitsm, yet you in your superior wisdom have decided IT IS NOT? So why do you get to decide?

And does it not concern you that (some) Jews find his remarks and actions offensive? For example, I once used "the" when I said "the blacks" and was criticized, soundly, for saying "the." I don't get why it's racist, because I refer to the Jews in that context plenty of times. Yet, because I was told it IS offensive, I never did it again. Why? Because I don't want to refer to black people in a way that (some at least) find offensive, even if I myself don't see that it is.

Amazing how the anger and pushback is being leveled at Jews who dare open their mouths when they see obvious antisemtitsm. It should be Trayon White you're condemning, not "us Jews."

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Are you kidding me here? Why are you defending someone who has expressed such retrograde, abhorrent views and at every public opportunity has doubled down on them?

Because no such thing has happened. Get back to me when you are ready to discuss reality.

I'm completely ready to "discuss reality." Here is what White said: “And D.C. keep talking about, ‘We a resilient city.’ And that’s a model based off the Rothschilds controlling the climate to create natural disasters they can pay for to own the cities, man. Be careful.”

I'm dumbfounded that anyone with even the slightest awareness of history could suggest this is not anti-Semitic.

It is only anti-Semitic if you know that the Rothschilds are Jewish and are part of historical anti-Semitic conspiracy theories. If you don't know such things -- and it appears that White didn't -- it is no different than as if he had blamed the weather on the Smith family.

Yes, it is hard to believe that he was unaware of the religion of the Rothschilds, but I have run into other DC natives -- some quite well educated -- who also didn't know anything about the Rothschilds. You are confusing ignorance with anti-Semitism.

Moreover, White has not espoused his moronic conspiracy theory "at every public opportunity" and nor has he "doubled down on them". To the contrary, he apologized and engaged in an effort to educate himself about anti-Semitism. Given your misunderstanding of White's actions, it appears that White may not be the only one speaking from a position of ignorance.

I don't misunderstand anything. Hate speech is hate speech. Ignorance is not a justification for disseminating vile conspiracy theories, especially about an ethnic or racial group. And his behavior at the Holocaust Museum was worse than doubling down. He walked out on his tour guide after making attempts to justify Nazi barbarism. That's not "an effort to educate himself about anti-Semitism."

Why are you defending him?

DP point to me the exact phrase where Mr White explicitly blames Jews for the climate manipulation .

The Rothschilds were a wealthy Jewish family from Germany. There has been an antisemetic conspiracy theory surrounding the Rothschilds which emanated, I believe from the Nazis since the 1930’s or thereabouts. It is an age old antisemetic trope to blame the Rothschilds for all the bad in the world or to say thaT they control things. Anyone who knows anything about antisemetism knows that invoking the Rothschilds name is the same as saying the Jews. This could probably be explained better, but I gave it a shot.

He could've said the same thing about the koch brothers and there would be No gesticulation from you , you're well within your right to draw or attempt to parallels between his blaming the Rothschild for climate manipulation and anti Semitism , but what you won't do is pretend that you have the monopoly of the truth and that there's no difference between someone explicitly saying stuff like Jews are responsible for climate manipulation or Jews will not replace us and someone blaming a bunch of wealthy who happen to be Jewish ( a fact that he may or may not have known ) for climate manipulation.

Jews are not above reproach and criticizing someone who also happens to be Jewish , or spreading conspiracy theories about someone who happens to be Jewish and anti Semitism isn't mutually exclusive . From the onset some of you decided that it was anti Semitism and were certainly not expecting to be met with vigorous counter arguments that although not necsssrily defending Mr White, sought to push back against this troubling mindset that if you Jews deem something anti Semite then it must be so . IT IS NOT

So you're pissed that "we Jews" have decided it's antisemtitsm, yet you in your superior wisdom have decided IT IS NOT? So why do you get to decide?

And does it not concern you that (some) Jews find his remarks and actions offensive? For example, I once used "the" when I said "the blacks" and was criticized, soundly, for saying "the." I don't get why it's racist, because I refer to the Jews in that context plenty of times. Yet, because I was told it IS offensive, I never did it again. Why? Because I don't want to refer to black people in a way that (some at least) find offensive, even if I myself don't see that it is.

Amazing how the anger and pushback is being leveled at Jews who dare open their mouths when they see obvious antisemtitsm. It should be Trayon White you're condemning, not "us Jews."