Anonymous wrote:Kremlin Chuck never sleeps:

https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/2018-01-25%20CEG%20LG%20to%20Brazile%20(Steele%20Dossier).pdf

Anonymous wrote:Adult day care needs their own caregivers. Remember when Trump claimed he fired Comey because the FBI was too hard on Hillary. Well, someone in the comments shop who can’t proofread a statement apparently didn’t get the memo. Oopsie. Heckuva job Cobbie.

Anonymous wrote:April Ryan reported on this when it was happening in June. The reports this week simply confirm her reports and had more details.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Put the order in but backed off when White House Counsel threatened to quit.

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/01/25/us/politics/trump-mueller-special-counsel-russia.html?action=Click&contentCollection=BreakingNews&contentID=66419382&pgtype=Homepage

Breaking News? Back in May it broke.

Um, no...

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Put the order in but backed off when White House Counsel threatened to quit.

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/01/25/us/politics/trump-mueller-special-counsel-russia.html?action=Click&contentCollection=BreakingNews&contentID=66419382&pgtype=Homepage

Breaking News? Back in May it broke.

Anonymous wrote:Put the order in but backed off when White House Counsel threatened to quit.

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/01/25/us/politics/trump-mueller-special-counsel-russia.html?action=Click&contentCollection=BreakingNews&contentID=66419382&pgtype=Homepage

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Where’s that straight answer???

The question was a made up fantasy and you expect a straight answer to fantasy? Give me fact and you'll get a straight answer.

Yeah, it's made up fantasy because I don't want to bicker with you over facts. We both know there's no video diary. But even if there were, you'd still say it's not enough, wouldn't you?

I just bolded your own point. How stupid is it, really?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Where’s that straight answer???

The question was a made up fantasy and you expect a straight answer to fantasy? Give me fact and you'll get a straight answer.

Yeah, it's made up fantasy because I don't want to bicker with you over facts. We both know there's no video diary. But even if there were, you'd still say it's not enough, wouldn't you?

I just bolded your own point. How stupid is it, really?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Per fact-check:
Q: Can President Donald Trump fire special counsel Robert Mueller?
A: Not directly. Only the deputy attorney general who appointed Mueller can fire him and only for cause. But Trump could fire the DAG, or order the special-counsel regulations repealed and fire Mueller himself.

Let's make sure your views on this are crystal clear. Let's pretend Mueller finds Trump's secret video diary, where Trump says ... "Hi Diary, it's Donald. I'm getting worried now that Mueller is getting close to figuring some of the criminal activity I've been involved in over the years, so I need to figure out a way to block his investigation. I'll start by getting Don McGahn and Jeff Sessions to just fire Mueller. If that doesn't work, I'll take more direct action. I just need to stop that investigation!" A FBI forensics team verifies beyond a shadow of a doubt that it's really Trump on the video.

In that completely over-the-top situation, would you STILL say there's no crime in firing Mueller because Trump has an absolute right to fire the Special Counsel?

I'm just trying to figure out if you think there are any limits at all. Can you give a straight answer?

We don’t have to pretend. We found Strzok and Page’s secret diary and the truth is ugly.

I dunno. I'm a lawyer and we're trained not to put our notes into files, because just about any notes will be used against you. That also includes texts, of course, but texts are not usually a worry about ending up in a file.

I think you're making a bit much of a bunch of stupid texts. Not everyone is as professional or as smart as they could be -- that doesn't somehow negate their investigations or other investigations.

They are not just a bunch of 'stupid texts'. They name names and talk of how they manipulated their own investigations to favor one Presidential candidate over another, amongst other things.

No, it has not been proven that they contain any such thing. They contain snarky comments and jokes like the "secret society" and the names they name and direct their contempt at also include Eric Holder, the Clintons and Bernie Sanders which pretty much torpedos the whole partisanship angle.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Where’s that straight answer???

The question was a made up fantasy and you expect a straight answer to fantasy? Give me fact and you'll get a straight answer.

Yeah, it's made up fantasy because I don't want to bicker with you over facts. We both know there's no video diary. But even if there were, you'd still say it's not enough, wouldn't you?

Anonymous wrote:If Trump truly has nothing to hide why is his every action to the contrary?