Anonymous wrote:
Breaking news: The House Intelligence Panel has asked Susan Rice to testify, supposedly under oath.

Bet she invokes the 5th.

Anonymous wrote:Did Rice just said "I leaked nothing to nobody"?

Is she really THAT stupid?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Evelyn Farkas started the whole ball rolling:

“I was urging my former colleagues and, frankly speaking, the people on the Hill – it was more actually aimed at telling the Hill people, get as much information as you can, get as much intelligence as you can, before President Obama leaves the administration.”

Loose lips sink ships.

Sinking the Trump ship. I can't believe you a-holes who are pissed because the campaign was caught talking to shady people. You loved the bright light of Wikileaks on the sausage making at the DNC and now you are pissed because people engaged in potential treason were monitored.

We'll know one knows who they were speaking to, except the one report on the Russian ambassador. Both campaigns were chock full of foreign policy advisers - I would imagine both Trump and Hilary's people were chatting with people all over the world. I just don't see the scandal in someone speaking with an ambassador.

**Well, no**

And I am certain that the Hillary camp was not spending time trying to connect with Putin. Putin hates her.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She did it for political reasons.

That much should be obvious to all.

For US political reasons or for Russian political reasons? Nowadays, it seems you need to specify.

By "Russian reasons," are you referring to a fake scandal manufactured by Team Obama?

The evidence is mounting that Obama orchestrated this as a sophisticated dis-information operation.

Exactly.

BS. Why were so many Trump folks meeting with Russians? Trump folks have admitted to these meetings. I am not sure how a dis-info campaign here, but it certainly does not arise from meetings that did take place. PPs need to get real here. We are talking about the Russians here. Are you an American?

Best comment on Twitter tonight...from an unnamed nonpartisan intelligence official....
Unmasking atory is like the Iraq WMD - a theory in search of facts.

Anonymous wrote:Huh, what's the controversy here? She's the President's top adviser on national security matters. So long as she went through the proper channels to seek authorization, there are no issues.

And yeah, domestic campaign staff communicating with foreign adversaries is a pretty good reason to ask for unmasking.

Talk about missing the forest for the trees, OP.

Agree. FYI, OP. The forest here is that why were so many Trump folks talking to the Russians. No legitimate reason. Trump was not in office.

Anonymous wrote:
Breaking news: The House Intelligence Panel has asked Susan Rice to testify, supposedly under oath.

Who cares about the House Intelligence Panel? The Senate is conducting the the important investigation. Aside from the FBI, etc.

Breaking news: The House Intelligence Panel has asked Susan Rice to testify, supposedly under oath.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:-Jeff Sessions: Met w/Russian spy; lied
-Carter Page: Met w/Russian spy; lied
-Mike Flynn: Met w/Russian spy; lied
-Susan Rice: Did her job

Do we want to talk about all the Russians the Clintons met with or got paid by?

Fake news (i.e. bogus uranium story) and even if it weren't it's nothing on the scale of what's gone on with Trump.

And PP left out
-Trump: Meetings with Putin's bag man Ryobovolev, Artemenko, Felix Sater and others
-Manafort: Met w/FSB spies
-Erik Prince (Betsy DeVos's brother): Secret meeting with Putin aide to set up back channel before Trump was elected
-Kushner: Met with Kislyak, Gorkov, Russian business entanglements
-Donald Trump Jr: Met with Felix Sater, Russian business entanglements
-Tillerson: Met with Putin, Igor Section, Russian business entanglements
-Wilbur Ross: Russian business entanglements
-Roger Stone: Worked with Russian hackers
-J.D. Gordon: Met with Kislyak
-Michael Caputo: Met with Putin, Russian business entanglements
-Rick Gates: Met with Firtash, Russian business entanglements
-Michael Cohen: Ties to Sater, Artemenko
-Papadopouslos: Ties to Sergei Millian

Could go on and on and more keeps getting uncovered every day

Did Rice just said "I leaked nothing to nobody"?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No names have been published. Maybe the media has names but the public doesn't.

And a presidential candidate's team having policy talks with Russia is not political, it's a matter of national security.

Flynn’s name was leaked.
Others have not been, to my knowledge, but judging from what has been said about this story, names do appear in the documents that Nunes and others have seen.

You're assuming that the leaks may have come from the American IC or someone from the Obama administration. That would be a bad assumption. We know for a fact that multiple European intelligence agencies tipped off the U.S. IC and have copies of phone calls and emails. Anything that is crossing the undersea cables or satellites are getting sucked by GCHQ. Small Baltic states also have communications (they are really adept with computers, ya know).

The question remains.... why were the names unmasked? What was the reason? And, why did Rice claim ignorance when asked about it?
Rice has yet to respond to requests for comment.

When did you stop beating your wife?

Anonymous wrote:-Jeff Sessions: Met w/Russian spy; lied
-Carter Page: Met w/Russian spy; lied
-Mike Flynn: Met w/Russian spy; lied
-Susan Rice: Did her job

Do we want to talk about all the Russians the Clintons met with or got paid by?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This whole thing is ludicrous. LET TRUMP CAMPAIGN COMMIT TREASON IN PEACE

The only way we could judge whether Susan Rice unmasked these names in accordance with the law is to find out the content of these communications.

So I say out with it all, and we'll convict whomever was in the wrong.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Rice is going down for treason. Left is trying to deflect with Russia crap, it's hilarious and futile.

Looks like the troll who thinks collusion with Russia is 'hilarious' has decided to make an appearance. BTW, you forgot the requisite 'lol'.

Why do you all respond and feed the troll or bot? Giving it attention just brings more. It is like appeasing a toddler. You just get even worse behavior.

Anonymous wrote:This whole thing is ludicrous. LET TRUMP CAMPAIGN COMMIT TREASON IN PEACE