Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:bye bye affirmative action. it is definitely getting gutted within 4 years for publics, if not for privates as well.
#MAGA
What is the actual mechanism by which you see this happening?
1. scalia is replaced by a conservative
2. One of RBG (83), Breyer (78), or Kennedy (80) dies. Actuarial tables can forecast a probability of that.
3. 2018 map really favors R's in the senate. easy confirmation of another conservative to replace one of the names mentioned in #2 that passed away.
4. with a 6-3 majority, one of the many suits that are brought up against affirmative action will make way to scotus. aa is destroyed.
5. oh and with such a composition, it'll be quite a straight shot to ban it at privates as well. The applicable statute is title vi of the 1964 civil rights act.
Title VI of the 1964 Civil Rights Act, which bans racial discrimination by schools that receive federal funds.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:bye bye affirmative action. it is definitely getting gutted within 4 years for publics, if not for privates as well.
#MAGA
What is the actual mechanism by which you see this happening?
Anonymous wrote:bye bye affirmative action. it is definitely getting gutted within 4 years for publics, if not for privates as well.
#MAGA
You and your salivating fangs couldn't wait to restart this thread.Anonymous wrote:bye bye affirmative action. it is definitely getting gutted within 4 years for publics, if not for privates as well.
#MAGA
Who knows? Could this country have been built without my ancestors' stolen labor? Could your parents or grandparents attend good schools if they weren't white?
I didn't create this country, but I'm damned sure turning any lemons I've received into lemonade. And I am unapologetic. Does that upset you?
There were people in my class with lower grades who weren’t in all the activities I was in, who were being accepted into UT, and the only other difference between us was the color of our skin.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Thanks, I feel great! Hmmm...my contribution to my success: Ivy undergrad and law school (with numerous academic honors). Partnership at big law (after working my ass off in a less than hospitable environment) and married to a successful entrepreneur with similar academic credentials. Any AA I have received is my due. Please and thank you.
You couldn't do it w/o AAction?
Who knows? Could this country have been built without my ancestors' stolen labor? Could your parents or grandparents attend good schools if they weren't white?
I didn't create this country, but I'm damned sure turning any lemons I've received into lemonade. And I am unapologetic. Does that upset you?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:http://mobile.nytimes.com/2013/08/04/education/edlife/lifting-the-veil-on-the-holistic-process-at-the-university-of-california-berkeley.html
The truth on the "holisitc" farce
:::Yawn:::
I'm looking forward to a "Confessions" article on how the 'elite' applicant is handled: legacy, very wealthy donors or potential donors, children of very connected individuals (politicians, celebrities, royalty), and students from connected boarding schools/elite privates.
And another one on elite athletes with poor academics.
For every minor piece of ethnic/racial social engineering, there are probably 10 admissions based on money and connections and sports.
I am always dismayed how people get up in arms about brown or black folks getting an edge, but not on white rich folks getting even more of an edge.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anyone who thinks URMs don't get huge bumps at ivies is kidding themselves. Further more, admissions spots are fungible so to the poster that says that Asians compete against other Asians and whites only for spots means there is a de facto URM target enrollment quota that schools aim for every year.
The reason why I know URMs get a huge bump is because I posted before how my company asks for standardized test scores and transcripts from UG and MBA a
I'm the poster you referred to. Of course there is a target URM enrollment. There is also a target legacy, sports, merit, etc. If there was no affirmative action, the number of URM's would decrease to about 3% black and 4% Hispanic at most top 20 schools. However, this doesn't mean the number of Asian students would significantly increase to make up the difference. I guarantee that the number of white students would be proportionally higher. I have set on committees where it was clearly stated that no group should be over represented. Everyone in the room knows what that means.
Anonymous wrote:http://mobile.nytimes.com/2013/08/04/education/edlife/lifting-the-veil-on-the-holistic-process-at-the-university-of-california-berkeley.html
The truth on the "holisitc" farce