Anonymous wrote:Have any top private 3.5s gotten college results yet?
Anonymous wrote:I imagine your rarely asked anything at all.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Have any top private 3.5s gotten college results yet?
ED comes out 12/15. Anyone who's already heard either applied rolling (which tend to be lower tier schools) or is a recruited athlete.
"Lower tier" like the University of Michigan?
Anonymous wrote:Kids don't take 30 AP courses in high school. Kudos to places that have more offerings, but I don't read that Sidwell offering "only" 10 AP courses as a suggestion they have no purpose or value.
Of course Sidwell is a very good school. But unless your kid is a recruited soccer player or your family has some legacy plays, discounting the AP coursework and 5s score cards doesn't seem like a cogent thing to assert. College admissions have become so crazy competitive, to me it seems like any relative advantage not taken is a liability. Sad statement, but there are those who'd disagree at their peril.
Four of those 10 APs that Sidwell offers are in each of four foreign languages. The rest spread out over math, science, and even one in AP Art.Anonymous wrote:But what if a school, like Sidwell, offers only 8-10 APs. It's honestly difficult to take more than 4-5 AP classes at Sidwell though you can take more exams.
I couldn't agree more about Michigan. It is an excellent school. I'm just not sure about the high state school tuition/room & board ($57,432) when DC could attend a private (think Bowdoin, Bates, etc) for slightly less with much smaller classes and student body. The powers that be (hiring managers) know the schools so we don't need to start the 'nobody has heard of these schools' argument.Anonymous wrote:University of Michigan is absolutely one of the best schools a kid could go to. At some point, all parents should look at the sponsored research tables for universities. Michigan has huge figures in their medical and engineering graduate schools. Locally, Univ of Maryland is quite strong in the latter.
Over four years of undergrad, who wouldn't want their kid being taught by graduate students who are funded to be doing real cutting edge research? I went to a very selective liberal arts college, and frankly never felt it never translated well for professional life. Unless a kid is committed to a path that fully relies on grad school, I think it is a mistake to dismiss the practical analysis.
Anonymous wrote:"Anywhere they want"? Nope. At least not according to our college counselor at a comparable private HS, for a 3.8 kid.